Dataset Information

Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Patient-reported distress (PRD) has not been well assessed in association with survival after radiation therapy (RT). The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between PRD level and survival after definitive RT and to identify the main causes of distress in definitive RT patients.

Methods and materials

A total of 678 consecutive patients receiving definitive RT at our institution from April 2012 through May 2015 were included. All patients answered a PRD questionnaire that contained 30 items related to possible causes of distress, which could be rated from 1 (no distress) to 5 (high distress). Additionally, patients were asked to rate their overall distress level from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). This overall distress level was our primary patient-reported distress measure and was examined as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable with 3 PRD levels (low, 0-3 [n = 295]; moderate, 4-6 [n = 222]; and high, 7-10 [n = 161]).

Results

As a continuous variable in multivariable Cox regression analysis, a higher overall PRD level was associated with poorer survival after RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; P = .004). As a categorical variable, compared with patients with low distress, survival was poorer for patients with moderate distress (HR, 1.62; P = .038) or high distress (HR, 1.49; P = .12), but the latter difference was not significant. When the moderate and high distress levels were combined, survival was significantly poorer compared with the low distress level (HR, 1.57; P = .034). The top 5 specific causes of distress that patients mentioned were "How I feel during treatment," "Fatigue," "Out-of-pocket medical costs," "Pain that affects my daily functioning," and "Sleep difficulties."

Conclusions

PRD before or during RT is a prognostic factor associated with decreased survival. Distress screening guidelines and interventions should be implemented for patients receiving definitive RT.

SUBMITTER: Habboush Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5514245 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.

Habboush Yacob Y Shannon Robert P RP Niazi Shehzad K SK Hollant Laeticia L Single Megan M Gaines Katherine K Smart Bridget B Chimato Nicolette T NT Heckman Michael G MG Buskirk Steven J SJ Vallow Laura A LA Tzou Katherine S KS Ko Stephen J SJ Peterson Jennifer L JL Biers Heather A HA Day Atiya B AB Nelson Kimberly A KA Sloan Jeff A JA Halyard Michele Y MY Miller Robert C RC

Advances in radiation oncology 20170320 2

<h4>Objective</h4>Patient-reported distress (PRD) has not been well assessed in association with survival after radiation therapy (RT). The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between PRD level and survival after definitive RT and to identify the main causes of distress in definitive RT patients.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>A total of 678 consecutive patients receiving definitive RT at our institution from April 2012 through May 2015 were included. All patients answered a PRD qu ...[more]

PMID: 28740934

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeWe evaluated the feasibility of patient symptom self-reporting using a web-based interface (WBI), with automated message alerts for severe and/or worsening symptoms, in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT).Methods and materialsPatients receiving definitive CRT for gastrointestinal, lung, and head and neck cancers with access to a computer and/or mobile device were eligible. Symptom self-reporting was conducted via a WBI through surveys adapted from the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: 2 per week during CRT and 1 per week for 3 months after CRT. Nurses were alerted whenever a patient's symptom worsened by ≥2 points or reached a score of ≥3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys were conducted at baseline, end of CRT, and 3 months after CRT. Patients also completed exit surveys 3 months after CRT.ResultsNineteen patients were enrolled with a median of 30 fractions (range, 28-33). The median survey completion rate was 26% (range, 0%-100%) during CRT and 33% (range, 0%-100%) during the first 3 months after CRT. Five (26%) had acute hospital encounters during CRT or within 3 months of CRT completion. Two patients (11%) experienced CRT treatment interruptions. During CRT, 70 of 81 surveys (86%) were flagged and 61 of 70 (87%) were acted upon by a nurse or physician within 4 days; during the first 3 months after CRT, 47 of 85 (55%) were flagged and 28 of 47 (60%) were acted upon within 7 days. Ninety-two percent of patients found it always easy to access the survey while 58% found the surveys too long or too frequent. None of the PROMIS domains had statistically significant changes during any time points.ConclusionsSymptom self-reporting via a WBI is feasible during definitive chemoradiation with high patient satisfaction. Survey fatigue is common and may be mitigated by improving the WBI to make it more patient-centered and allowing patients to choose which symptoms to report.

Project description:AimThis study aimed to explore associations between radiation dose and patient-reported outcomes in patients with a primary non-glioblastoma brain tumour treated with radiation therapy (RT), with a focus on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and self-reported cognitive function.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 78 patients who had received RT for a non-glioblastoma primary brain tumour, underwent neuropsychological testing and completed questionnaires on HRQoL, cognitive function, fatigue, depression, anxiety and perceived stress. The study explores the association between HRQoL scores, self-reported cognitive function and radiation doses to total brain, brainstem, hippocampus, thalamus, temporal lobes and frontal lobes. In addition, we examined correlations between neuropsychological test scores and self-reported cognitive function.ResultsThe median time between RT and testing was 4.6 years (range 1-9 years). Patients who had received high mean radiation doses to the total brain had low HRQoL scores (Cohen's d = 0.50, p = 0.04), brainstem (d = 0.65, p = 0.01) and hippocampus (d = 0.66, p = 0.01). High mean doses to the total brain were also associated with low scores on self-reported cognitive functioning (Cohen's d = 0.64, p = 0.02), brainstem (d = 0.55, p = 0.03), hippocampus (d = 0.76, p < 0.01), temporal lobes (d = 0.70, p < 0.01) and thalamus (d = 0.64, p = 0.01). Self-reported cognitive function correlated well with neuropsychological test scores (correlation range 0.27-0.54.).ConclusionsHigh radiation doses to specific brain structures may be associated with impaired HRQoL and self-reported cognitive function with potentially negative implications to patients' daily lives. Patient-reported outcomes of treatment-related side-effects and their associations with radiation doses to the brain and its sub-structures may provide important information on radiation tolerance to the brain and sub-structures.

Project description:PurposeThe complex technological processes involved in radiation therapy can be intimidating to patients, causing increased treatment-related anxiety and reduced satisfaction. An intervention was implemented to provide direct consultations between patients and medical physicists to reduce patient anxiety and improve patient satisfaction. A randomized clinical trial was conducted to test the intervention's effect on anxiety, distress, treatment adherence, technical understanding, and satisfaction in patients receiving radiation therapy.Methods and materialsEligible patients were recruited into "intervention" and "standard of care" arms within a phase 2 screening randomized trial. Intervention-arm patients met with a medical physicist who provided technical information and addressed patient questions or concerns at the time of treatment simulation and before the first treatment. In addition to baseline information collected before randomization, participants were surveyed (1) before simulation, (2) before the first treatment, and (3) before the completion of treatment to evaluate the study endpoints. Primary endpoints included patient anxiety and distress. Secondary endpoints included patient treatment adherence, overall satisfaction, and technical understanding of treatment. Patients in the intervention arm were surveyed before and after each physicist meeting.ResultsParticipant anxiety was significantly reduced in the intervention arm (difference, -0.29; 95% confidence interval, -0.57 to -0.02; P = .038). No differences in distress or treatment adherence were observed between groups. Although measures of technical understanding and satisfaction were evaluated as exploratory objectives, participants in the intervention group were more likely to feel that technical aspects of treatment were adequately explained (difference, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.54), and all measures of technical understanding and satisfaction were considerably higher in the intervention group at the time of the first visit.ConclusionsThe establishment of a direct patient-provider relationship with the medical physicist reduced anxiety in patients receiving radiation therapy. In addition, increases in patient understanding of the technical aspects of care and in satisfaction were observed at the initiation of treatment.

Project description:PurposeTo identify which patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may be most improved through adaptive radiation therapy (ART) with the goal of reducing toxicity incidence among head and neck cancer patients.MethodsOne hundred fifty-five head and neck cancer patients receiving radical VMAT (chemo)radiotherapy (66-70 Gy in 30-35 fractions) completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Xerostomia Questionnaire while attending routine follow-up clinics between June-October 2019. Hierarchical clustering characterized symptom endorsement. Conventional statistical approaches indicated associations between dose and commonly reported symptoms. These associations, and the potential benefit of interfractional dose corrections, were further explored via logistic regression.ResultsRadiotherapy-related symptoms were commonly reported (dry mouth, difficulty swallowing/chewing). Clustering identified three patient subgroups reporting: none/mild symptoms for most items (60.6% of patients); moderate/severe symptoms affecting some aspects of general well-being (32.9%); and moderate/severe symptom reporting for most items (6.5%). Clusters of PRO items broadly consisted of acute toxicities, general well-being, and head and neck-specific symptoms (xerostomia, dysphagia). Dose-PRO relationships were strongest between delivered pharyngeal constrictor Dmean and patient-reported dysphagia, with MDADI composite scores (mean ± SD) of 25.7 ± 18.9 for patients with Dmean <50 Gy vs. 32.4 ± 17.1 with Dmean ≥50 Gy. Based on logistic regression models, during-treatment dose corrections back to planned values may confer ≥5% decrease in the absolute risk of self-reported physical dysphagia symptoms ≥1 year post-treatment in 1.2% of patients, with a ≥5% decrease in relative risk in 23.3% of patients.ConclusionsPatient-reported dysphagia symptoms are strongly associated with delivered dose to the pharyngeal constrictor. Dysphagia-focused ART may provide the greatest toxicity benefit to head and neck cancer patients, and represent a potential new direction for ART, given that the existing ART literature has focused almost exclusively on xerostomia reduction.

Dataset Information

Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.

Objective

Methods and materials

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets