Dataset Information

Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in metastatic colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is urgent need for improved staging in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in comparison with circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with mCRC amenable for potentially curative surgery.

Methods

A total of 140 patients were enrolled prospectively. CTC and CEC were measured with the CellSearch System (Veridex, NJ, USA). Cut-off values were determined using ROC analyses. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

ROC analyses revealed ≥ 21 CEC as cut-off levels for detection, which was present in 68 (49%). CEC detection was associated with female gender (p = 0.03) only, whereas CTC detection was associated with presence of the primary tumor (p = 0.007), metastasis size (p < 0.001), bilobar liver metastases (p = 0.02), CEA (p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 levels (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only CEC detection (HR 1.81; p = 0.03) and preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 2.28, p = 0.005) were revealed as independent predictors of poor survival.

Conclusions

CEC are of stronger prognostic value than CTC. Further studies are required to validate these results and to evaluate CEC as predictive biomarker for systemic therapy alone as well as in combination with other markers such as CA19-9.

SUBMITTER: Rahbari NN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5514924 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-specific death in both sexes in Western countries. KRAS mutations occur in about 50% of metastatic CRCs (mCRCs). The prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations still remains unexplored and unclear. Two hundred and forty KRAS wild-type and 206 KRAS/NRAS mutant consecutive unresectable mCRC patients with PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1, aged < 80 years, and with a life expectancy >3 months entered into this study. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumour tissues, and it was sequenced with the Oncomine Solid Tumour DNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Data were analysed using the Torrent Suite Software v5.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primary outcome was the analysis of the prognostic role of different KRAS mutations in terms of overall survival (OS). There were no significant differences among the most prevalent mutations (p.G12D, p.G12V, p.G13D, p.G12A, p.G12C, and p.G12S) in terms of age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), gender (male vs. female), grading (G1/G2 vs. G3), side of primary tumour (left vs. right), pT, and pN. At the median follow-up of 25.6 months, there were 77 deaths in KRAS-mutated patients and 94 in wild-type patients. Three homogeneous prognostic groups were identified: wild-type patients (group A, median survival: 27.5 months), p.G13D/p.G12A/p.G12V/p.G12D mutants (group B, median survival: 17.3 months), and p.G12C/p.G12S mutants (group C, median survival: 5.0 months, p < 0.0001 according to Log Rank test). Upon multivariate analysis, metastatic involvement and p.G12C/p.G12S KRAS mutation group C (vs. other mutations) emerged as independent prognostic variables for survival. We show that mutant KRAS is a negative prognostic factor and that p.G12C/p.G12S variants present the worst clinical courses. This information suggests a clear difference among KRAS mutations, and it will be useful to test potentiated and/or innovative therapeutic strategies in p.G12C/p.G12S metastatic CRC patients.

Project description:Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) have potential utility in various clinical applications for cancer management. The present study focused on evaluating the diagnostic role of CTCs in colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 89 blood samples from 59 patients diagnosed with CRC and 30 healthy individuals were collected for CTC detection. The Cyttel method is an improved CTC detection strategy, which combines negative enrichment with immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization. This method effectively detected a significant increase in total CTCs in patients with CRC (49/59) compared with those in healthy controls (3/30). A cut-off value of 2 CTCs/3.2 ml blood yielded a sensitivity of 83.05% and a specificity of 100%. Additionally, three traditional serum tumour markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and CA72-4, were examined by immunoassays. The diagnostic sensitivity of CTCs was much higher than that of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 alone or in combination, particularly in patients with early stage CRC. The combined sensitivity of CTCs and CEA reached 91.53%, which was only slightly lower than the sensitivity of all four markers combined (CTCs + CEA + CA19-9 + CA72-4). CTCs with aneuploidy of chromosome 7 or 8 were carefully distinguished, and the associations among different types of CTCs, clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival were statistically analysed. Total CTCs were revealed to be significantly associated with tumour differentiation and nerve invasion. CTCs were more likely to be detected in poorly differentiated CRC tumours than in well- and moderately-differentiated tumours (P=0.026). Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to report that CTCs with multiploidy of chromosome 7 were significantly associated with TNM stage. These CTCs exhibited a high chance of being identified in the peripheral blood of patients with late-stage CRC (stage III-IV; P=0.031). The present study suggests that the combination of CTCs and CEA may serve as an effective potential diagnostic and prognostic indicator in patients with CRC. Detection of CTCs with aneuploidy may have increased specificity in predicting highly malignant and invasive tumours in CRC management.