Dataset Information

Prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits in patients with primary gastric cancer.

ABSTRACT: The presence and the prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits (TDs) in primary gastric cancer have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance perigastric TDs in primary gastric cancer.From 2005 to 2010, 1250 patients underwent R0 gastrectomy at the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. Out of 1250 patients, 132 patients with perigastric TDs were identified. Additionally, 132 patients with staged matched gastric cancer without tumor deposits were selected as a control group.Perigastric TDs were observed in 132 (10.5%) of the 1250 patients with gastric cancer who underwent R0 gastrectomy. There were 94 males (71.21%) and 38 females (28.79%) (2.47:1). The mean age was 57.21 years. Clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups matched well. There was a significant difference in the overall survival of those with and without TDs by univariate (p<0.05) and multivariate (p < 0.05) survival analysis. The 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with TDswere69.6%, 39.3%, and 24.2%, respectively, and were significantly poorer than those of the staged matched control group. There was no correlation between the number of TDs and patient survival in patients with gastric cancer (p>0.05); however, when comparing each pT tumor group with the perigastric TD group, the stage T4 survival rate was very similar to that observed in patients with TDs.Perigastric TDs are an independent predictive prognostic factor for gastric cancer and may be appropriately considered a form of serosal invasion. We suggest that TDs should be included in TNM staging system for better outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Anup S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5518113 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits in patients with primary gastric cancer.

Anup Shrestha S Lu Jun J Zheng Chao-Hui CH Li Ping P Xie Jian-Wei JW Wang Jia-Bin JB Lin Jian-Xian JX Chen Qi-Yue QY Cao Long-Long LL Lin Mi M Yu Qian Q Yang Ying-Hong YH Huang Chang-Ming CM

BMC surgery 20170719 1

<h4>Background</h4>The presence and the prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits (TDs) in primary gastric cancer have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance perigastric TDs in primary gastric cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>From 2005 to 2010, 1250 patients underwent R0 gastrectomy at the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. Out of 1250 patients, 132 patients with perigastric TDs were i ...[more]

PMID: 28724367

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTumor deposits (TDs) have been identified as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). However, the associated clinicopathological factors and how to simply and reasonably incorporate TD into the TNM staging system remain undetermined. The aim of the current study was therefore to assess the significance of TD among radically resected GC patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1915 patients undergoing radical resection between 2007 and 2012. The patients were classified into two groups according to TD status (absent vs. present), and the clinicopathologic characteristics, DFS, and OS were compared. Associations of TD presence with other clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for DFS and OS in the primary cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the possibility of selection bias according to the presence of TD. External validation of previously proposed modified staging systems incorporating TD was conducted.ResultsThe detection rate of TD was 10.5% (201/1915). The presence of TD was significantly related to unfavorable clinicopathologic variables, including advanced T and N categories. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of TD was identified as an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS in the primary cohort (both P < 0.001). In the after-PSM cohort, TD presence also significantly shortened DFS and OS. In the external validation, one system that incorporated TD into the pTNM stage had the best performance.ConclusionsThe presence of TD was significantly associated with poor survival in radically resected GC patients. The incorporation of TD into the TNM staging system can further improve the predictive capability. A multicenter cohort with a large sample size is needed to determine the appropriate method of incorporation.

Project description:AimTumor deposits (TDs) are an aggressive hallmark of rectal cancer, but their prognostic value has not been addressed in current staging systems. This study aimed to construct and validate a prognostic nomogram for rectal cancer patients with TDs.MethodsA total of 1,388 stage III-IV rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgical resection from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed to identify the clinical value of TDs. TD-positive rectal cancer patients in the SEER database were used as the training set to construct a prognostic model, which was validated by Fujian Cancer Hospital. Three models were constructed to predict the prognosis of rectal cancer patients with TDs, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO, model 1), backward stepwise regression (BSR, model 2), and LASSO followed by BSR (model 3). A nomogram was established among the three models.ResultsIn the entire cohort, TD was also identified as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS), even after adjusting for baseline factors, stage, other risk factors, treatments, and all the included variables in this study (all P < 0.05). Among patients with TDs, model 3 exhibited a higher C-index and area under the curves (AUCs) at 3, 4, and 5 years compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system both in the training and validation sets (all P < 0.05). The nomogram obtained from model 3 showed good consistency based on the calibration curves and excellent clinical applicability by the decision curve analysis curves. In addition, patients were divided into two subgroups with apparently different OS according to the current nomogram (both P < 0.05), and only patients in the high-risk subgroup were found to benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (P < 0.05).ConclusionWe identified a novel nomogram that could not only predict the prognosis of rectal cancer patients with TDs but also provide reliable evidence for clinical decision-making.

Dataset Information

Prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits in patients with primary gastric cancer.

Publications

Prognostic significance of perigastric tumor deposits in patients with primary gastric cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets