Dataset Information

GlycoPep MassList: software to generate massive inclusion lists for glycopeptide analyses.

ABSTRACT: Protein glycosylation drives many biological processes and serves as markers for disease; therefore, the development of tools to study glycosylation is an essential and growing area of research. Mass spectrometry can be used to identify both the glycans of interest and the glycosylation sites to which those glycans are attached, when proteins are proteolytically digested and their glycopeptides are analyzed by a combination of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods. One major challenge in these experiments is collecting the requisite MS/MS data. The digested glycopeptides are often present in complex mixtures and in low abundance, and the most commonly used approach to collect MS/MS data on these species is data-dependent acquisition (DDA), where only the most intense precursor ions trigger MS/MS. DDA results in limited glycopeptide coverage. Semi-targeted data acquisition is an alternative experimental approach that can alleviate this difficulty. However, due to the massive heterogeneity of glycopeptides, it is not obvious how to expediently generate inclusion lists for these types of analyses. To solve this problem, we developed the software tool GlycoPep MassList, which can be used to generate inclusion lists for liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) experiments. The utility of the software was tested by conducting comparisons between semi-targeted and untargeted data-dependent analysis experiments on a variety of proteins, including IgG, a protein whose glycosylation must be characterized during its production as a biotherapeutic. When the GlycoPep MassList software was used to generate inclusion lists for LC-MS/MS experiments, more unique glycopeptides were selected for fragmentation. Generally, ?30 % more unique glycopeptides can be analyzed per protein, in the simplest cases, with low background. In cases where background ions from proteins or other interferents are high, usage of an inclusion list is even more advantageous. The software is freely publically accessible. Graphical abstract Software increases the number of glycopeptides that get selected for MS/MS analysis.

SUBMITTER: Hu W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5521198 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

GlycoPep MassList: software to generate massive inclusion lists for glycopeptide analyses.

Hu Wenting W Su Xiaomeng X Zhu Zhikai Z Go Eden P EP Desaire Heather H

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 20160910 2

Protein glycosylation drives many biological processes and serves as markers for disease; therefore, the development of tools to study glycosylation is an essential and growing area of research. Mass spectrometry can be used to identify both the glycans of interest and the glycosylation sites to which those glycans are attached, when proteins are proteolytically digested and their glycopeptides are analyzed by a combination of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry ( ...[more]

PMID: 27614974

Similar Datasets

Project description:Clinical trials are essential parts of a medical study process, but studies are often cancelled due to a lack of participants. Clinical Trial Recruitment Support Systems are systems that help to increase the number of participants by seeking more suitable subjects. The software ATLAS (developed by Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics) can support the launch of a clinical trial by building cohorts of patients who fulfill certain criteria. The correct use of medical classification systems aiming at clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria in the studies is an important pillar of this software. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether ATLAS can be used in a Clinical Trial Recruitment Support System to portray the eligibility criteria of clinical studies. Our analysis considered the number of criteria feasible for integration with ATLAS and identified its strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, we investigated whether nonrepresentable criteria were associated with the utilized terminology systems. We analyzed ATLAS using 223 objective eligibility criteria from 30 randomly selected trials conducted in the last 10 years. In the next step, we selected appropriate ICD, OPS, LOINC, or ATC codes to feed the software. We classified each criterion and study based on its implementation capability in the software, ensuring a clear and logical progression of information. Based on our observations, 51% of the analyzed inclusion criteria were fully implemented in ATLAS. Within our selected example set, 10% of the studies were classified as fully portrayable, and 73% were portrayed to some extent. Additionally, we conducted an evaluation of the software regarding its technical limitations and interaction with medical classification systems. To improve and expand the scope of criteria within a cohort definition in a practical setting, it is recommended to work closely with personnel involved in the study to define the criteria precisely and to carefully select terminology systems. The chosen criteria should be combined according to the specific setting. Additional work is needed to specify the significance and amount of the extracted criteria.

Project description:Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been among the leading advances in biomedicine in recent years. As a proxy of genetic liability, PRSs are utilised across multiple fields and applications. While numerous statistical and machine learning methods have been developed to optimise their predictive accuracy, these typically distil genetic liability to a single number based on aggregation of an individual's genome-wide risk alleles. This results in a key loss of information about an individual's genetic profile, which could be critical given the functional sub-structure of the genome and the heterogeneity of complex disease. In this manuscript, we introduce a 'pathway polygenic' paradigm of disease risk, in which multiple genetic liabilities underlie complex diseases, rather than a single genome-wide liability. We describe a method and accompanying software, PRSet, for computing and analysing pathway-based PRSs, in which polygenic scores are calculated across genomic pathways for each individual. We evaluate the potential of pathway PRSs in two distinct ways, creating two major sections: (1) In the first section, we benchmark PRSet as a pathway enrichment tool, evaluating its capacity to capture GWAS signal in pathways. We find that for target sample sizes of >10,000 individuals, pathway PRSs have similar power for evaluating pathway enrichment as leading methods MAGMA and LD score regression, with the distinct advantage of providing individual-level estimates of genetic liability for each pathway -opening up a range of pathway-based PRS applications, (2) In the second section, we evaluate the performance of pathway PRSs for disease stratification. We show that using a supervised disease stratification approach, pathway PRSs (computed by PRSet) outperform two standard genome-wide PRSs (computed by C+T and lassosum) for classifying disease subtypes in 20 of 21 scenarios tested. As the definition and functional annotation of pathways becomes increasingly refined, we expect pathway PRSs to offer key insights into the heterogeneity of complex disease and treatment response, to generate biologically tractable therapeutic targets from polygenic signal, and, ultimately, to provide a powerful path to precision medicine.

Project description:Abundant citizen science data on species occurrences are becoming increasingly available and enable identifying composition of communities occurring at multiple sites with high temporal resolution. However, for species displaying temporary patterns of local occurrences that are transient to some sites, biodiversity measures are clearly dependent on the criteria used to include species into local species lists. Using abundant opportunistic citizen science data from frequently visited wetlands, we investigated the sensitivity of α- and β-diversity estimates to the use raw versus detection-corrected data and to the use of inclusion criteria for species presence reflecting alternative site use. We tested seven inclusion criteria (with varying number of days required to be present) on time series of daily occurrence status during a breeding season of 90 days for 77 wetland bird species. We show that even when opportunistic presence-only observation data are abundant, raw data may not produce reliable local species richness estimates and rank sites very differently in terms of species richness. Furthermore, occupancy model based α- and β-diversity estimates were sensitive to the inclusion criteria used. Total species lists (all species observed at least once during a season) may therefore mask diversity differences among sites in local communities of species, by including vagrant species on potentially breeding communities and change the relative rank order of sites in terms of species richness. Very high sampling effort does not necessarily free opportunistic data from its inherent bias and can produce a pattern in which many species are observed at least once almost everywhere, thus leading to a possible paradox: The large amount of biological information may hinder its usefulness. Therefore, when prioritizing among sites to manage or preserve species diversity estimates need to be carefully related to relevant inclusion criteria depending on the diversity estimate in focus.

Dataset Information

GlycoPep MassList: software to generate massive inclusion lists for glycopeptide analyses.

Publications

GlycoPep MassList: software to generate massive inclusion lists for glycopeptide analyses.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets