Dataset Information

PUREAIR protocol: randomized controlled trial of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation versus standard care in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer. Surgery is proven to be the most effective treatment in early stages, despite its potential impact on quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation, either before or after surgery, is associated with reduced morbidity related symptoms and improved exercise capacity, lung function and quality of life.We describe the study protocol for the open-label randomized controlled trial we are conducting on patients affected by primary lung cancer (stages I-II) eligible for surgical treatment. The control group receives standard care consisting in one educational session before surgery and early inpatient postoperative physiotherapy. The treatment group receives, in addition to standard care, intensive rehabilitation involving 14 preoperative sessions (6 outpatient and 8 home-based) and 39 postoperative sessions (15 outpatient and 24 home-based) with aerobic, resistance and respiratory training, as well as scar massage and group bodyweight exercise training. Assessments are performed at baseline, the day before surgery and one month and six months after surgery. The main outcome is the long-term exercise capacity measured with the Six-Minute Walk Test; short-term exercise capacity, lung function, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, quality of life (Short Form 12), mood disturbances (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) are also recorded and analysed. Patient compliance and treatment-related side effects are also collected. Statistical analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat approach. T-test for independent samples will be used for continuous variables after assessment of normality of distribution. Chi-square test will be used for categorical variables. Expecting a 10% dropout rate, assuming ? of 5% and power of 80%, we planned to enrol 140 patients to demonstrate a statistically significant difference of 25 m at Six-Minute Walk Test.Pulmonary Resection and Intensive Rehabilitation study (PuReAIR) will contribute significantly in investigating the effects of perioperative rehabilitation on exercise capacity, symptoms, lung function and long-term outcomes in surgically treated lung cancer patients. This study protocol will facilitate interpretation of future results and wide application of evidence-based practice.ClinicalTrials.gov Registry n. NCT02405273 [31.03.2015].

SUBMITTER: Fugazzaro S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5537935 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PUREAIR protocol: randomized controlled trial of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation versus standard care in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer.

Fugazzaro Stefania S Costi Stefania S Mainini Carlotta C Kopliku Besa B Rapicetta Cristian C Piro Roberto R Bardelli Roberta R Rebelo Patricia Filipa Sobral PFS Galeone Carla C Sgarbi Giorgio G Lococo Filippo F Paci Massimiliano M Ricchetti Tommaso T Cavuto Silvio S Merlo Domenico Franco DF Tenconi Sara S

BMC cancer 20170731 1

<h4>Background</h4>Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer. Surgery is proven to be the most effective treatment in early stages, despite its potential impact on quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation, either before or after surgery, is associated with reduced morbidity related symptoms and improved exercise capacity, lung function and quality of life.<h4>Methods</h4>We describe the study protocol for the open-label randomized controlled trial we are conducting on pa ...[more]

PMID: 28760151

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: Post-operative rehabilitation following rotator cuff tear repair (RCR) is important to promote tendon healing, restore strength, and recover normal function. Aquatic therapy in hot water allows body relaxation, which promotes patient conditioning for efficient rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess whether aquatic therapy is more efficient than standard (land-based) rehabilitation in terms of range of motion (ROM), function, and pain after arthroscopic RCR. Methods: We prospectively randomized 86 patients scheduled for arthroscopic RCR to either aquatic therapy (n = 44) or standard rehabilitation (n = 42) using block sizes of four or six. Patients were evaluated clinically at 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 months and using ultrasound (US) at 6 months. Two-way mixed ANOVA tests were performed to evaluate the effects of rehabilitation type (between-subjects factor) on ROM and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) over time (within-subjects factor). Post-hoc inter-group comparisons at each time point were also conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or unpaired Student t-tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic data or pre-operative characteristics, except for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, which was lower in the aquatic therapy group (37.9 ± 23.6 vs. 55.6 ± 24.9, p = 0.019). The mixed model revealed the absence of interaction effect between the type of rehabilitation and time on PROMs and ROM except on the SANE score (p < 0.001), which was biased by the existing pre-operative difference mentioned above. Furthermore, none of the post-operative outcomes were statistically different between the two groups at 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 months. In addition, no significant difference could be noted regarding tendon healing rate (p = 0.443), complication (p = 0.349), workstop duration (0.585), or patient satisfaction (p = 0.663). Conclusion: Compared to the standard rehabilitation, the aquatic therapy did not yield superior clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic RCR when started immediately after the surgery.

Project description:BackgroundCigarette smoking is a risk factor for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Investigation defining the relationships between ILAs/ILDs and clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings in smokers have been incomplete. Employing a cohort undergoing surgical resection for lung nodules/masses, we (1) define the prevalence of ILAs/ILDs, (2) delineate their clinical, radiographic and pathologic predictors, and (3) determine their associations with mortality.MethodsPatients undergoing resection of lung nodules/masses between 2017 and 2020 at a rural Appalachian, tertiary medical center were retrospectively investigated. Predictors for ILAs/ILDs and mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn the total study cohort of 352 patients, radiographic ILAs and ILDs were observed in 35.2% and 17.6%, respectively. Among ILA patterns, subpleural reticular changes (14.8%), non-emphysematous cysts, centrilobular (CL) ground glass opacities (GGOs) (8% each), and mixed CL-GGO and subpleural reticular changes (7.4%) were common. ILD patterns included combined pulmonary fibrosis emphysema (CPFE) (3.1%), respiratory bronchiolitis (RB)-ILD (3.1%), organizing pneumonitis (2.8%) and unclassifiable (4.8%). The group with radiographic ILAs/ILDs had a significantly higher proportion of ever smokers (49% vs. 39.9%), pack years of smoking (44.57 ± 36.21 vs. 34.96 ± 26.22), clinical comorbidities of COPD (35% vs. 26.5%) and mildly reduced diffusion capacity (% predicated 66.29 ± 20.55 vs. 71.84 ± 23). Radiographic centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema (40% vs. 22.2% and 17.6% vs. 9.6%, respectively) and isolated traction bronchiectasis (10.2% vs. 4.2%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Pathological variables of emphysema (34.9% vs. 18.5%), any fibrosis (15.9% vs. 4.6%), peribronchiolar metaplasia (PBM, 8% vs. 1.1%), RB (10.3% vs. 2.5%), and anthracosis (21.6% vs. 14.5%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Histologic emphysema showed positive correlations with any fibrosis, RB, anthracosis and ≥ 30 pack year of smoking. The group with ILAs/ILDs had significantly higher mortality (9.1% vs. 2.2%, OR 4.13, [95% CI of 1.84-9.25]).ConclusionsIn a rural cohort undergoing surgical resection, radiographic subclinical ILAs/ILDs patterns were highly prevalent and associated with ever smoking and intensity of smoking. The presence of radiographic ILA/ILD patterns and isolated honeycomb changes were associated with increased mortality. Subclinical ILAs/ILDs and histologic fibrosis correlated with clinical COPD as well as radiographic and pathologic emphysema emphasizing the co-existence of these pulmonary injuries in a heavily smoking population.

Project description:Background: The complex nature of stroke sequelae, the heterogeneity in rehabilitation pathways, and the lack of validated prediction models of rehabilitation outcomes challenge stroke rehabilitation quality assessment and clinical research. An integrated care pathway (ICP), defining a reproducible rehabilitation assessment and process, may provide a structured frame within investigated outcomes and individual predictors of response to treatment, including neurophysiological and neurogenetic biomarkers. Predictors may differ for different interventions, suggesting clues to personalize and optimize rehabilitation. To date, a large representative Italian cohort study focusing on individual variability of response to an evidence-based ICP is lacking, and predictors of individual response to rehabilitation are largely unexplored. This paper describes a multicenter study protocol to prospectively investigate outcomes and predictors of response to an evidence-based ICP in a large Italian cohort of stroke survivors undergoing post-acute inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: All patients with diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed both by clinical and brain imaging evaluation, admitted to four intensive rehabilitation units (adopting the same stroke rehabilitation ICP) within 30 days from the acute event, aged 18+, and providing informed consent will be enrolled (expected sample: 270 patients). Measures will be taken at admission (T0), at discharge (T1), and at follow-up 6 months after a stroke (T2), including clinical data, nutritional, functional, neurological, and neuropsychological measures, electroencephalography and motor evoked potentials, and analysis of neurogenetic biomarkers. Statistics: In addition to classical multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced machine learning algorithms will be cross-validated to achieve data-driven prognosis prediction models. Discussion: By identifying data-driven prognosis prediction models in stroke rehabilitation, this study might contribute to the development of patient-oriented therapy and to optimize rehabilitation outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03968627. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03968627?term=Cecchi&cond=Stroke&draw=2&rank=2.

Dataset Information

PUREAIR protocol: randomized controlled trial of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation versus standard care in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer.

Publications

PUREAIR protocol: randomized controlled trial of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation versus standard care in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets