Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Trends in readmission rates for safety net hospitals and non-safety net hospitals in the era of the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare trends in readmission rates among safety net and non-safety net hospitals under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).

Design

A retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from January 2008 to June 2015.

Setting

We examined 3254 US hospitals eligible for penalties under the HRRP, categorised as safety net or non-safety net hospitals based on the hospital's proportion of patients with low socioeconomic status.

Participants

Admissions for Medicare fee-for-service patients, age ?65 years, discharged alive, who had a valid five-digit zip code and did not have a principal discharge diagnosis of cancer or psychiatric illness were included, for a total of 52 516 213 index admissions.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Mean hospital-level, all-condition, 30-day risk-adjusted standardised unplanned readmission rate, measured quarterly, along with quarterly rate of change, and an interrupted time series examining: April-June 2010, after HRRP was passed, and October-December 2012, after HRRP penalties were implemented.

Results

58.0% (SD 15.3) of safety net hospitals and 17.1% (SD 10.4) of non-safety net hospitals' patients were in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status. The mean safety net hospital standardised readmission rate declined from 17.0% (SD 3.7) to 13.6% (SD 3.6), whereas the mean non-safety net hospital declined from 15.4% (SD 3.0) to 12.7% (SD 2.5). The absolute difference in rates between safety net and non-safety net hospitals declined from 1.6% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.9) to 0.9% (0.7 to 1.2). The quarterly decline in standardised readmission rates was 0.03 percentage points (95%?CI 0.03 to 0.02, p<0.001) greater among safety net hospitals over the entire study period, and no differential change among safety net and non-safety net hospitals was found after either HRRP was passed or penalties enacted.

Conclusions

Since HRRP was passed and penalties implemented, readmission rates for safety net hospitals have decreased more rapidly than those for non-safety net hospitals.

SUBMITTER: Salerno AM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5541519 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Trends in readmission rates for safety net hospitals and non-safety net hospitals in the era of the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015.

Salerno Amy M AM   Horwitz Leora I LI   Kwon Ji Young JY   Herrin Jeph J   Grady Jacqueline N JN   Lin Zhenqiu Z   Ross Joseph S JS   Bernheim Susannah M SM  

BMJ open 20170713 7


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare trends in readmission rates among safety net and non-safety net hospitals under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).<h4>Design</h4>A retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from January 2008 to June 2015.<h4>Setting</h4>We examined 3254 US hospitals eligible for penalties under the HRRP, categorised as safety net or non-safety net hospitals based on the hospital's proportion of patients with low socioeconomic stat  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7376002 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6324411 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3527010 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6656617 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6153176 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5905698 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6537916 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6556828 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7243587 | biostudies-literature