Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Adaptation to public goods cheats in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.


ABSTRACT: Cooperation in nature is ubiquitous, but is susceptible to social cheats who pay little or no cost of cooperation yet reap the benefits. The effect such cheats have on reducing population productivity suggests that there is selection for cooperators to mitigate the adverse effects of cheats. While mechanisms have been elucidated for scenarios involving a direct association between producer and cooperative product, it is less clear how cooperators may suppress cheating in an anonymous public goods scenario, where cheats cannot be directly identified. Here, we investigate the real-time evolutionary response of cooperators to cheats when cooperation is mediated by a diffusible public good: the production of iron-scavenging siderophores by Pseudomonas aeruginosa We find that siderophore producers evolved in the presence of a high frequency of non-producing cheats were fitter in the presence of cheats, at no obvious cost to population productivity. A novel morphotype independently evolved and reached higher frequencies in cheat-adapted versus control populations, exhibiting reduced siderophore production but increased production of pyocyanin-an extracellular toxin that can also increase the availability of soluble iron. This suggests that cooperators may have mitigated the negative effects of cheats by downregulating siderophore production and upregulating an alternative iron-acquisition public good. More generally, the study emphasizes that cooperating organisms can rapidly adapt to the presence of anonymous cheats without necessarily incurring fitness costs in the environment they evolve in.

SUBMITTER: O'Brien S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5543229 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Adaptation to public goods cheats in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>.

O'Brien Siobhán S   Luján Adela M AM   Paterson Steve S   Cant Michael A MA   Buckling Angus A  

Proceedings. Biological sciences 20170701 1859


Cooperation in nature is ubiquitous, but is susceptible to social cheats who pay little or no cost of cooperation yet reap the benefits. The effect such cheats have on reducing population productivity suggests that there is selection for cooperators to mitigate the adverse effects of cheats. While mechanisms have been elucidated for scenarios involving a direct association between producer and cooperative product, it is less clear how cooperators may suppress cheating in an anonymous public good  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| PRJEB17843 | ENA
| S-EPMC6794470 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3732961 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3957720 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10802355 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6175192 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2566181 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3040203 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3865686 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2683138 | biostudies-literature