Dataset Information

Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To determine whether dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) characteristics of the breast tumor and background parenchyma can distinguish molecular subtypes (ie, luminal A/B or basal) of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In all, 84 patients from one institution and 126 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used for discovery and external validation, respectively. Thirty-five quantitative image features were extracted from DCE-MRI (1.5 or 3T) including morphology, texture, and volumetric features, which capture both tumor and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) characteristics. Multiple testing was corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false-discovery rate (FDR). Sparse logistic regression models were built using the discovery cohort to distinguish each of the three studied molecular subtypes versus the rest, and the models were evaluated in the validation cohort. RESULTS:On univariate analysis in discovery and validation cohorts, two features characterizing tumor and two characterizing BPE were statistically significant in separating luminal A versus nonluminal A cancers; two features characterizing tumor were statistically significant for separating luminal B; one feature characterizing tumor and one characterizing BPE reached statistical significance for distinguishing basal (Wilcoxon P < 0.05, FDR < 0.25). In discovery and validation cohorts, multivariate logistic regression models achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.71 and 0.73 for luminal A cancer, 0.67 and 0.69 for luminal B cancer, and 0.66 and 0.79 for basal cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION:DCE-MRI characteristics of breast cancer and BPE may potentially be used to distinguish among molecular subtypes of breast cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1017-1027.

SUBMITTER: Wu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5548657 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation.

Wu Jia J Sun Xiaoli X Wang Jeff J Cui Yi Y Kato Fumi F Shirato Hiroki H Ikeda Debra M DM Li Ruijiang R

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 20170208 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>To determine whether dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) characteristics of the breast tumor and background parenchyma can distinguish molecular subtypes (ie, luminal A/B or basal) of breast cancer.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In all, 84 patients from one institution and 126 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used for discovery and external validation, respectively. Thirty-five quantitative image features were extracted from DCE-MRI ( ...[more]

PMID: 28177554

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: To identify novel breast cancer subtypes by extracting quantitative imaging phenotypes of the tumor and surrounding parenchyma and to elucidate the underlying biologic underpinnings and evaluate the prognostic capacity for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS).Experimental Design: We retrospectively analyzed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data of patients from a single-center discovery cohort (n = 60) and an independent multicenter validation cohort (n = 96). Quantitative image features were extracted to characterize tumor morphology, intratumor heterogeneity of contrast agent wash-in/wash-out patterns, and tumor-surrounding parenchyma enhancement. On the basis of these image features, we used unsupervised consensus clustering to identify robust imaging subtypes and evaluated their clinical and biologic relevance. We built a gene expression-based classifier of imaging subtypes and tested their prognostic significance in five additional cohorts with publically available gene expression data but without imaging data (n = 1,160).Results: Three distinct imaging subtypes, that is, homogeneous intratumoral enhancing, minimal parenchymal enhancing, and prominent parenchymal enhancing, were identified and validated. In the discovery cohort, imaging subtypes stratified patients with significantly different 5-year RFS rates of 79.6%, 65.2%, 52.5% (log-rank P = 0.025) and remained as an independent predictor after adjusting for clinicopathologic factors (HR, 2.79; P = 0.016). The prognostic value of imaging subtypes was further validated in five independent gene expression cohorts, with average 5-year RFS rates of 88.1%, 74.0%, 59.5% (log-rank P from <0.0001 to 0.008). Each imaging subtype was associated with specific dysregulated molecular pathways that can be therapeutically targeted.Conclusions: Imaging subtypes provide complimentary value to established histopathologic or molecular subtypes and may help stratify patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); 3334-42. ©2017 AACR.

Dataset Information

Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation.

Publications

Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets