Dataset Information

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.

ABSTRACT: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are becoming popular alternatives for smokers, but there has been limited study of their abuse liability.The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse liability of three Vuse Solo ECs, ranging from 14 to 36 mg in nicotine content, relative to high- and low-abuse liability comparator products (usual brand combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, respectively) in a group of 45 EC-naïve smokers.Enrolled subjects' ratings of subjective effects and nicotine uptake over 6 h were used to measure abuse liability and pharmacokinetics following in-clinic use of each EC.Use of Vuse Solo resulted in subjective measures and nicotine uptake that were between those of combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, although generally closer to nicotine gum. Compared to combustible cigarettes, use of Vuse Solo resulted in significantly lower scores in measures of product liking, positive effects, and intent to use again. These pharmacodynamic findings were consistent with the pharmacokinetic data, showing that cigarettes produced substantially faster and higher levels of nicotine uptake as compared to Vuse Solo and nicotine gum. Vuse Solo resulted in more rapid initial uptake of nicotine compared to nicotine gum, but peak concentration and long-term extent of uptake were not different or were lower with Vuse.Collectively, these findings suggest that Vuse Solo likely has an abuse liability that is somewhat greater than nicotine gum but lower than cigarettes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02269514.

SUBMITTER: Stiles MF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5548902 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.

Stiles Mitchell F MF Campbell Leanne R LR Graff Donald W DW Jones Bobbette A BA Fant Reginald V RV Henningfield Jack E JE

Psychopharmacology 20170620 17

<h4>Rationale</h4>Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are becoming popular alternatives for smokers, but there has been limited study of their abuse liability.<h4>Objectives</h4>The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse liability of three Vuse Solo ECs, ranging from 14 to 36 mg in nicotine content, relative to high- and low-abuse liability comparator products (usual brand combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, respectively) in a group of 45 EC-naïve smokers.<h4>Methods</h4>Enrolled subject ...[more]

PMID: 28634710

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceUse of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing. Measures of exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users will inform potential health risks to individual product users.ObjectivesTo estimate concentrations of tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users and compare these biomarker concentrations with those observed in combustible cigarette users, dual users, and never tobacco users.Design, setting, and participantsA population-based, longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the United States in 2013-2014. Cross-sectional analysis was performed between November 4, 2016, and October 5, 2017, of biomarkers of exposure to tobacco-related toxicants collected by the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Participants included adults who provided a urine sample and data on tobacco use (N = 5105).ExposuresThe primary exposure was tobacco use, including current exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 247), current exclusive cigarette smokers (n = 2411), and users of both products (dual users) (n = 792) compared with never tobacco users (n = 1655).Main outcomes and measuresGeometric mean concentrations of 50 individual biomarkers from 5 major classes of tobacco product constituents were measured: nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).ResultsOf the 5105 participants, most were aged 35 to 54 years (weighted percentage, 38%; 95% CI, 35%-40%), women (60%; 95% CI, 59%-62%), and non-Hispanic white (61%; 95% CI, 58%-64%). Compared with exclusive e-cigarette users, never users had 19% to 81% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure to nicotine, TSNAs, some metals (eg, cadmium and lead), and some VOCs (including acrylonitrile). Exclusive e-cigarette users showed 10% to 98% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure, including TSNAs, PAHs, most VOCs, and nicotine, compared with exclusive cigarette smokers; concentrations were comparable for metals and 3 VOCs. Exclusive cigarette users showed 10% to 36% lower concentrations of several biomarkers than dual users. Frequency of cigarette use among dual users was positively correlated with nicotine and toxicant exposure.Conclusions and relevanceExclusive use of e-cigarettes appears to result in measurable exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants, generally at lower levels than cigarette smoking. Toxicant exposure is greatest among dual users, and frequency of combustible cigarette use is positively correlated with tobacco toxicant concentration. These findings provide evidence that using combusted tobacco cigarettes alone or in combination with e-cigarettes is associated with higher concentrations of potentially harmful tobacco constituents in comparison with using e-cigarettes alone.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Dual use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and combustible cigarettes is a major public health issue. It is generally accepted that exclusive e-cigarette use is less harmful than exclusive combustible cigarette use, but most e-cigarette users continue to smoke combustible cigarettes as well. To what extent the use of e-cigarettes reduces harm in people who continue to smoke combustible cigarettes has been debated. The aim of this study was to explore the utility of biomarkers as measures of dual use. METHODS:In two human studies of participants who used e-cigarettes only or both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes, we measured urine concentrations of the metabolites of nicotine (total nicotine equivalents) as well as two biomarkers of tobacco exposure: 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), a tobacco-specific carcinogen metabolite, and nicotelline, a tobacco alkaloid not found in significant concentrations in e-cigarette products. RESULTS:The presence of nicotine metabolites indicates either e-cigarette or combustible cigarette use. Nicotelline (half-life of 2-3 hours) indicates recent combustible cigarette use and NNAL (half-life of 10 days or more), indicates combustible cigarette use occurring within several weeks prior to sample collection. CONCLUSIONS:Nicotelline and NNAL are useful biomarkers for combustible tobacco use in users e-cigarettes. The application of these biomarkers provides a tool to help assess whether, or to what extent, dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes reduces harm compared to sole use of combustible cigarettes. These biomarkers can also verify exclusive use of e-cigarettes over short (24 hour) or long (several week) time periods. IMPLICATIONS:To what extent dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes reduce harm compared to smoking combustible cigarettes only is of considerable public health interest. We show that the levels of the minor tobacco alkaloid nicotelline and the nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) are extremely low in electronic cigarette fluids. The urine biomarkers nicotelline and the NNK metabolite 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) are indicative of cigarette smoking and can be used to assess recent and past smoking in dual users.

Project description:IntroductionSmoking elevates catecholamines that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease. Sparse evidence exists about the effects of e-cigarettes and catecholamines. Higher levels of catecholamines could trigger the increased heart rate, blood pressure, and decreased vascular function reported with the use of e-cigarettes. We investigated the difference in urinary catecholamines and their metabolites before and after the use of an e-cigarette containing nicotine or cigarettes compared to no tobacco use.MethodsIn our observational cohort exposure study, healthy adults aged 21-45 years who were currently using e-cigarettes, cigarettes, or had never used tobacco, participated in an acute exposure visit using their most common tobacco product. Urine was collected before, 1, and 2 hours after a 3-second puff every 30 seconds for 10 minutes on an e-cigarette or straw or use of 1 cigarette. Urinary catecholamines and their metabolites were measured by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Participants (n=323) were grouped by the product used at the visit. We compared levels of creatinine normalized log-transformed urinary catecholamines and their metabolites across groups using Dunn's test following a Kruskal-Wallis test in unadjusted and demographically adjusted models.ResultsPrior to use, individuals who used cigarettes (n=70) had lower urinary metabolites from epinephrine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. No differences were seen in those who used e-cigarettes (n=171) and those who did not use tobacco (n=82). In fully adjusted models, 1 h after the use of a combustible or e-cigarette, log-transformed urinary metabolites from norepinephrine (β=1.22; 95% CI: 0.39-2.05, p=0.004 and β=1.06; 95% CI: 0.39-1.74, p=0.002), dopamine (β=0.37; 95% CI: 0.24-0.5, p<0.001 and β=0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.26, p<0.001), and epinephrine (β=1.89; 95% CI: 0.51-3.27, p=0.008 and β=1.49; 95% CI: 0.38-2.61, p=0.009) were elevated. In fully adjusted models, combustible cigarette use was associated with elevated urinary norepinephrine (β=0.46; 95% CI: 0.13-0.81, p=0.007) and dopamine (β=0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.31, p=0.003) 1 h after use.ConclusionsWe found that the use of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes was associated with elevated urinary catecholamines or their metabolites. Catecholamines could be useful as a biomarker of harm for tobacco use and considered by tobacco regulatory scientists in future research.

Dataset Information

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.

Publications

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets