Dataset Information

Immunogenicity and protection of oral influenza vaccines formulated into microparticles.

ABSTRACT: Influenza is a deadly disease affecting humans and animals. It is recommended that every individual should be vaccinated annually against influenza. Considering the frequency of administration of this vaccine, we have explored the oral route of vaccination with a microparticulate formulation. Microparticles containing inactivated influenza A/PR/34/8 H1N1 virus with Eudragit S and trehalose as a matrix were prepared using the Buchi spray dryer. Particle size distribution of microparticles was measured and the bioactivity of vaccine in a microparticle form was analyzed using a hemagglutination activity test. Furthermore, the efficacy of microparticle vaccines was evaluated in vivo in Balb/c mice. Analysis of serum samples showed that microparticles resulted in enhanced antigen-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG1, and IgG2a antibodies. Upon challenge with homologous and heterologous influenza viruses, microparticle vaccines showed significantly increased levels of protection. Use of microparticles to deliver vaccines could be a promising tool for the development of an oral influenza vaccine.

SUBMITTER: Shastri PN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5558794 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immunogenicity and protection of oral influenza vaccines formulated into microparticles.

Shastri Prathap Nagaraja PN Kim Min-Chul MC Quan Fu-Shi FS D'Souza Martin J MJ Kang Sang-Moo SM

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 20120618 10

Influenza is a deadly disease affecting humans and animals. It is recommended that every individual should be vaccinated annually against influenza. Considering the frequency of administration of this vaccine, we have explored the oral route of vaccination with a microparticulate formulation. Microparticles containing inactivated influenza A/PR/34/8 H1N1 virus with Eudragit S and trehalose as a matrix were prepared using the Buchi spray dryer. Particle size distribution of microparticles was mea ...[more]

PMID: 22711602

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Eradication of Plasmodium falciparum malaria will likely require a multivalent vaccine, but the development of a highly efficacious subunit-based formulation has been challenging. We previously showed that production and immunogenicity of two leading vaccine targets, PfMSP119 (blood-stage) and Pfs25 (sexual stage), could be enhanced upon genetic fusion to merozoite surface protein 8 (PfMSP8). Here, we sought to optimize a Pfs25-based formulation for use in combination with rPfMSP1/8 with the goal of maintaining the immunogenicity of each subunit. METHODS:Comparative mouse studies were conducted to assess the effects of adjuvant selection (Alhydrogel vs. glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-stable emulsion (GLA-SE)) and antigen dose (2.5 vs. 0.5 ?g) on the induction of anti-Pfs25 immune responses. The antibody response (magnitude, IgG subclass profile, and transmission-reducing activity (TRA)) and cellular responses (proliferation, cytokine production) generated in response to each formulation were assessed. Similarly, immunogenicity of a bivalent vaccine containing rPfMSP1/8 and rPfs25/8 was evaluated. RESULTS:Alum-based formulations elicited strong and comparable humoral and cellular responses regardless of antigen form (unfused rPfs25 or chimeric rPfs25/8) or dose. In contrast, GLA-SE based formulations elicited differential responses as a function of both parameters, with 2.5 ?g of rPfs25/8 inducing the highest titers of functional anti-Pfs25 antibodies. Based on these data, chimeric rPfs25/8 was selected and tested in a bivalent formulation with rPfMSP1/8. Strong antibody titers against Pfs25 and PfMSP119 domains were induced with GLA-SE based formulations, with no indication of antigenic competition. CONCLUSIONS:We were able to generate an immunogenic bivalent vaccine designed to target multiple parasite stages that could reduce both clinical disease and parasite transmission. The use of the same PfMSP8 carrier for two different vaccine components was effective in this bivalent formulation. As such, the incorporation of additional protective targets fused to the PfMSP8 carrier into the formulation should be feasible, further broadening the protective response.

Project description:ImportanceCOVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines were previously given separately, although their coadministration is warranted for vaccination adherence. Limited data on their coadministration have been published.ObjectiveTo compare the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations administered together with those of COVID-19 vaccination alone.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study included health care workers at a large tertiary medical center in Israel who received the Influvac Tetra (Abbott) influenza vaccine (2022/2023), the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine, or both. Vaccination began in September 2022, and data were collected until January 2023. Vaccines were offered to all employees and were coadministered or given separately. Adverse reaction questionnaires were sent, and serologic samples were also collected.ExposuresReceiving COVID-19 vaccine, influenza vaccine, or both.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcomes for the reactogenicity analysis were symptoms following vaccine receipt, assessed by a digital questionnaire: any local symptoms; fever; weakness or fatigue; any systemic symptoms; and their duration. The immunogenicity analysis' outcome was postvaccination anti-spike IgG titer.ResultsThis study included 2 cohorts for 2 separate analyses. The reactogenicity analysis included 588 participants (of 649 questionnaire responders): 85 in the COVID-19 vaccine-alone group (median [IQR] age, 71 [58-74] years; 56 [66%] female); 357 in the influenza vaccine-alone group (median [IQR] age, 55 [40-65] years; 282 [79%] female); and 146 in the coadministration group (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-71] years; 81 [55%] female). The immunogenicity analysis included 151 participants: 74 participants in the COVID-19 vaccine group (median [IQR] age, 67 [56-73] years; 45 [61%] female) and 77 participants in the coadministration group (median [IQR] age, 60 [49-73] years; 42 [55%] female). Compared with COVID-19 vaccination alone, the risk of systemic symptoms was similar in the coadministration group (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.56). Geometric mean titers in the coadministration group were estimated to be 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-1.04) times lower than in the COVID-19 vaccine-alone group.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of health care workers who received a COVID-19 vaccine, an influenza vaccine, or both, coadministration was not associated with substantially inferior immune response or to more frequent adverse events compared with COVID-19 vaccine administration alone, supporting the coadministration of these vaccines.

Dataset Information

Immunogenicity and protection of oral influenza vaccines formulated into microparticles.

Publications

Immunogenicity and protection of oral influenza vaccines formulated into microparticles.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets