Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting.


ABSTRACT: Hundreds of organizations and analysts use energy projections, such as those contained in the US Energy Information Administration (EIA)'s Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), for investment and policy decisions. Retrospective analyses of past AEO projections have shown that observed values can differ from the projection by several hundred percent, and thus a thorough treatment of uncertainty is essential. We evaluate the out-of-sample forecasting performance of several empirical density forecasting methods, using the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). The analysis confirms that a Gaussian density, estimated on past forecasting errors, gives comparatively accurate uncertainty estimates over a variety of energy quantities in the AEO, in particular outperforming scenario projections provided in the AEO. We report probabilistic uncertainties for 18 core quantities of the AEO 2016 projections. Our work frames how to produce, evaluate, and rank probabilistic forecasts in this setting. We propose a log transformation of forecast errors for price projections and a modified nonparametric empirical density forecasting method. Our findings give guidance on how to evaluate and communicate uncertainty in future energy outlooks.

SUBMITTER: Kaack LH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5565406 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting.

Kaack Lynn H LH   Apt Jay J   Morgan M Granger MG   McSharry Patrick P  

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20170731 33


Hundreds of organizations and analysts use energy projections, such as those contained in the US Energy Information Administration (EIA)'s Annual Energy Outlook (AEO), for investment and policy decisions. Retrospective analyses of past AEO projections have shown that observed values can differ from the projection by several hundred percent, and thus a thorough treatment of uncertainty is essential. We evaluate the out-of-sample forecasting performance of several empirical density forecasting met  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2778678 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3283699 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8713796 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8321128 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10237054 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4386326 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8361666 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9231822 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10069763 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9575866 | biostudies-literature