Dataset Information

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

ABSTRACT: Current guidelines do not recommend the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive direct oral anticoagulants. While the humanized monoclonal antibody idarucizumab can quickly reverse the anticoagulant effects of the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, safety data for subsequent tissue plasminogen activator treatment are sparse. Here, we review current knowledge about dabigatran reversal prior to systemic reperfusion treatment in acute ischemic stroke.We performed a systematic review of all published cases of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment following the administration of a dabigatran antidote up to June 2017 and added five unpublished cases of our own. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes, symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and other serious systemic bleeding. Additional endpoints were allergic reaction to idarucizumab, and venous thrombosis in the post-acute phase.We identified a total of 21 patients (71% male) with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range 70-84). The median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 10 (n = 20, interquartile range 5-11) and 18/20 patients (90%) had mild or moderate stroke severity. The time from symptom onset to start of tissue plasminogen activator was 155 min (n = 18, interquartile range 122-214). The outcome was unfavorable in 3/19 patients (16%). There was one fatality as a result of a symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and two patients experienced an increase in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale compared with baseline. One patient had a recurrent stroke. No systemic bleeding, venous thrombosis, or allergic reactions were reported.Experience with idarucizumab administration prior to tissue plasminogen activator treatment in acute ischemic stroke is limited. Initial clinical experience in less severe stroke syndromes and short time windows seems favorable. Larger cohorts are required to confirm safety, including bleeding complications and the risk of thrombosis.

SUBMITTER: Pikija S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5573762 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

Pikija Slaven S Sztriha Laszlo K LK Sebastian Mutzenbach J J Golaszewski Stefan M SM Sellner Johann J

CNS drugs 20170901 9

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Current guidelines do not recommend the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive direct oral anticoagulants. While the humanized monoclonal antibody idarucizumab can quickly reverse the anticoagulant effects of the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, safety data for subsequent tissue plasminogen activator treatment are sparse. Here, we review current knowledge about dabigatran reversal prior to system ...[more]

PMID: 28808918

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine any differential efficacy and safety of low- vs standard-dose IV alteplase for lacunar vs nonlacunar acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we performed post hoc analyzes from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) alteplase dose arm.MethodsIn a cohort of 3,297 ENCHANTED participants, we identified those with lacunar or nonlacunar AIS with different levels of confidence (definite/according to prespecified definitions based on clinical and adjudicated imaging findings. Logistic regression models were used to determine associations of lacunar AIS with 90-day outcomes (primary, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 2-6; secondary, other mRS scores, intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], and early neurologic deterioration or death) and treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS with adjustment for baseline covariables.ResultsOf 2,588 participants with available imaging and clinical data, we classified cases as definite/probable lacunar (n = 490) or nonlacunar AIS (n = 2,098) for primary analyses. Regardless of alteplase dose received, lacunar AIS participants had favorable functional (mRS 2-6, adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]) and other clinical or safety outcomes compared to participants with nonlacunar AIS. Low-dose alteplase (versus standard) had no differential effect on functional outcomes (mRS 2-6, 1.04 [0.87-1.24]) but reduced the risk of symptomatic ICH in all included participants. There were no differential treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase on all outcomes across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS (all p interaction ≥0.07).ConclusionsWe found no evidence from the ENCHANTED trial that low-dose alteplase had any advantages over standard dose for definite/probable lacunar AIS.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with lacunar AIS, low-dose alteplase had no additional benefit or safety over standard-dose alteplase.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01422616.

Project description:Background and purposePrompt thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase reduces disability after acute ischemic stroke. In an exploratory analysis, we examined whether long-term survival varied by baseline characteristics after alteplase.MethodsIn this open-treatment, international, randomized, controlled trial, ischemic stroke patients were randomly allocated <6 hours of onset to intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) plus standard care (n=1515) or standard care alone (n=1520). We followed patients to death, censoring when last known to be alive. We grouped patients by delay to randomization, and good or poor predicted prognosis (calculated from baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score and age). We present absolute mortality differences between treated and control groups at 7 days, 6 months, and 18 months poststroke.ResultsAlteplase was not associated with a significant increase in mortality within 18 months (0.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.9% to +4.2] P=0.72] in all patients with complete vital status (99.9%, 3034/3035). In patients randomized <3 hours of stroke, 18-month mortality was lower in the alteplase-treated group than the control group (40.6% [95% CI, 42.6-52.7] versus 47.8% [95% CI, 35.5-45.3]; P=0.0434]. The difference in 18-month mortality between alteplase-treated and control patients was greater in patients who were randomized early (<3 hours) compared with late (3-6 hours; +9% [95% CI, 1-17]; P=0.0317). Alteplase led to a greater improvement in 18-month survival in patients with a poor prognosis than in patients with a good prognosis (+8% [95% CI, 2-14]; P=0.0091).ConclusionsThese exploratory analyses of the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) trial support improving acute stroke patients' access to earlier alteplase treatment, treatment of patients with poor prognosis, and further randomized controlled trials in minor stroke to replicate these findings.Clinical trial registration urlhttp://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.

Dataset Information

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

Publications

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets