Dataset Information

Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors.

ABSTRACT: Approximately 20% of metastatic prostate cancers harbor mutations in genes required for DNA repair by homologous recombination repair (HRR) such as BRCA2 HRR defects confer synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) such as olaparib and talazoparib. In ovarian or breast cancers, olaparib resistance has been associated with HRR restoration, including by BRCA2 mutation reversion. Whether similar mechanisms operate in prostate cancer, and could be detected in liquid biopsies, is unclear. Here, we identify BRCA2 reversion mutations associated with olaparib and talazoparib resistance in patients with prostate cancer. Analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) reveals reversion mutation heterogeneity not discernable from a single solid-tumor biopsy and potentially allows monitoring for the emergence of PARPi resistance.Significance: The mechanisms of clinical resistance to PARPi in DNA repair-deficient prostate cancer have not been described. Here, we show BRCA2 reversion mutations in patients with prostate cancer with metastatic disease who developed resistance to talazoparib and olaparib. Furthermore, we show that PARPi resistance is highly multiclonal and that cfDNA allows monitoring for PARPi resistance. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 999-1005. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937See related article by Kondrashova et al., p. 984See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920.

SUBMITTER: Quigley D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5581695 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors.

Quigley David D Alumkal Joshi J JJ Wyatt Alexander W AW Kothari Vishal V Foye Adam A Lloyd Paul P Aggarwal Rahul R Kim Won W Lu Eric E Schwartzman Jacob J Beja Kevin K Annala Matti M Das Rajdeep R Diolaiti Morgan M Pritchard Colin C Thomas George G Tomlins Scott S Knudsen Karen K Lord Christopher J CJ Ryan Charles C Youngren Jack J Beer Tomasz M TM Ashworth Alan A Small Eric J EJ Feng Felix Y FY

Cancer discovery 20170427 9

Approximately 20% of metastatic prostate cancers harbor mutations in genes required for DNA repair by homologous recombination repair (HRR) such as BRCA2 HRR defects confer synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) such as olaparib and talazoparib. In ovarian or breast cancers, olaparib resistance has been associated with HRR restoration, including by BRCA2 mutation reversion. Whether similar mechanisms operate in prostate cancer, and could be detected in liquid biopsies, is u ...[more]

PMID: 28450426

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Reversion mutations in BRCA1/2, resulting in restoration of the open reading frame, have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy or PARP inhibition. We sought to explore the incidence of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in different tumor types. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed molecular profiling results from primary and/or metastatic tumor samples submitted by multiple institutions. The samples underwent DNA and RNA sequencing at a CLIA/CAP-certified clinical lab. Reversion mutations were called only in patients whose available clinical records showed the use of PARP inhibitors or platinum agents prior to tumor profiling. Results: Reversion mutations were identified in 75 of 247,926 samples profiled across all tumor types. Among patients carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes were seen in ovarian cancer (OC) (30/3424), breast cancer (BC) (27/1460), endometrial cancer (4/564), pancreatic cancer (2/340), cholangiocarcinoma (2/178), prostate cancer (5/461), cervical cancer (1/117), cancer of unknown primary (1/244), bladder cancer (1/300), malignant pleural mesothelioma (1/10), and a neuroendocrine tumor of the prostate. We identified 22 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 8 in BRCA2 in OC. In BC, we detected 6 reversion mutations in BRCA1 and 21 in BRCA2. We compared molecular profile results of 14 high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) with reversion mutations against 87 control HGSOC with pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations without reversion mutations. Tumors with reversion mutations trended to have had lower ER expression (25% vs. 64%, p = 0.024, q = 0.82) and higher KDM6A mutation rate (15% vs. 0, p = 0.016, q = 0.82). Conclusions: We present one of the largest datasets reporting reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 genes across various tumor types. These reversion mutations were rare; this may be because some patients may not have had repeat profiling post-treatment. Repeat tumor profiling at times of treatment resistance can help inform therapy selection in the refractory disease setting.

Project description:Background:Reversion mutations of somatic BRCA mutations are an important source of resistance within ovarian cancer. Furthermore, these reversion mutations are known to change over the course of treatment. Better understanding of the mechanisms leading to reversion mutations and the role of serial ctDNA collection in detecting changes to overall landscape of resistance mutations over time is needed to guide treatment in the metastatic setting. Methods:Here we study a case of metastatic ovarian cancer undergoing multiple lines of treatment with collection of three serial ctDNA samples. These samples were analyzed by Guardant Health next generation sequencing to detect somatic alterations and their associated mutant allele frequency (MAF) as % cfDNA. Results:Analysis of our initial ctDNA collection, taken during PARP-inhibitor therapy, revealed a nonsense BRCA-1 mutation (c. 2563C > T p. Q855?), consistent with the BRCA 1 somatic mutation detected on tumor tissue analysis. Initial analysis also revealed a reversion mutation (c.2535_2576del) resulting in an in-frame deletion of the somatic BRCA-1 alteration. The second collection, taken while still on PARP-inhibitor therapy, re-demonstrated this indel reversion mutation along with a second indel reversion mutation (c.2546_2587del), again resulting in an in-frame deletion of the somatic BRCA-1 mutation. The final ctDNA, collected upon initiation of immunotherapy, revealed 4 novel SNV reversion mutations (c.2564A > C, c.2564A > T, c.2565G > T, and c.2565G > C). These SNV reversion mutations result in missense amino acid changes rather than insertions or deletions within the BRCA-1 somatic mutation. The previous indel reversion mutations were no longer detected. Conclusions:This study illustrates the role of serial ctDNA analyses in the detection of resistance mutations and the dynamic nature of reversion mutations with multiple lines of treatment. While other studies have described both indels and SNVs that occur in tandem, a change in the types of reversion mutations detected across changing therapies has never before been described. Further studies regarding the unique selective pressures arising from use of multiple types of therapy is needed to fully explain this phenomenon.

Dataset Information

Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of BRCA2 Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors.

Publications

Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Identifies Multiclonal Heterogeneity of <i>BRCA2</i> Reversion Mutations Associated with Resistance to PARP Inhibitors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets