Unknown

Dataset Information

0

In Vivo Evaluation of the Acute Pulmonary Response to Poractant Alfa and Bovactant Treatments in Lung-Lavaged Adult Rabbits and in Preterm Lambs with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Poractant alfa (Curosurf®) and Bovactant (Alveofact®) are two animal-derived pulmonary surfactants preparations approved for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (nRDS). They differ in their source, composition, pharmaceutical form, and clinical dose. How much these differences affect the acute pulmonary response to treatment is unknown.

Objectives

Comparing these two surfactant preparations in two different animal models of respiratory distress focusing on the short-term response to treatment.

Methods

Poractant alfa and Bovactant were administered in a 50-200?mg/kg dose range to surfactant-depleted adult rabbits with acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by lavage and to preterm lambs (127-129?days gestational age) with nRDS induced by developmental immaturity. The acute impact of surfactant therapy on gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics was assessed for 1?h in surfactant-depleted rabbits and for 3?h in preterm lambs.

Results

Overall, treatment with Bovactant 50?mg/kg or Poractant alfa 50?mg/kg did not achieve full recovery of the rabbits' respiratory conditions, as indicated by significantly lower arterial oxygenation and carbon dioxide values. By contrast, the two approved doses for clinical use of Poractant alfa (100 and 200?mg/kg) achieved a rapid and sustained recovery in both animal models. The comparison of the ventilation indices of the licensed doses of Bovactant (50?mg/kg) and Poractant alfa (100?mg/kg) showed a superior performance of the latter preparation in both animal models. At equal phospholipid doses, Poractant alfa was superior to Bovactant in terms of arterial oxygenation in both animal models. In preterm lambs, surfactant replacement therapy with Poractant alfa at either 100 or 200?mg/kg was associated with significantly higher lung gas volumes compared to Bovactant treatment with 100?mg/kg.

Conclusion

At the licensed doses, the acute pulmonary response to Poractant alfa was significantly better than the one observed after Bovactant treatment, either at 50 or at 100?mg/kg dose, in two animal models of pulmonary failure.

SUBMITTER: Ricci F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5583171 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

<i>In Vivo</i> Evaluation of the Acute Pulmonary Response to Poractant Alfa and Bovactant Treatments in Lung-Lavaged Adult Rabbits and in Preterm Lambs with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Ricci Francesca F   Salomone Fabrizio F   Kuypers Elke E   Ophelders Daan D   Nikiforou Maria M   Willems Monique M   Krieger Tobias T   Murgia Xabier X   Hütten Matthias M   Kramer Boris W BW   Bianco Federico F  

Frontiers in pediatrics 20170831


<h4>Background</h4>Poractant alfa (Curosurf<sup>®</sup>) and Bovactant (Alveofact<sup>®</sup>) are two animal-derived pulmonary surfactants preparations approved for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (nRDS). They differ in their source, composition, pharmaceutical form, and clinical dose. How much these differences affect the acute pulmonary response to treatment is unknown.<h4>Objectives</h4>Comparing these two surfactant preparations in two different animal models of resp  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3558698 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7069639 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7375954 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7809896 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6480449 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7237025 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8449143 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5703120 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3558044 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7357056 | biostudies-literature