Dataset Information

Differences in telomere length between homologous chromosomes in humans.

ABSTRACT: Telomeres are important structures for DNA replication and chromosome stability during cell growth. Telomere length has been correlated with the division potential of human cells and has been found to decrease with age in healthy individuals. Nevertheless, telomere lengths within the same cell are heterogeneous and certain chromosome arms typically have either short or long telomeres. Both the origin and the physiological consequences of this heterogeneity in telomere length remain unknown. In this study we used quantitative telomeric FISH combined with a method to identify the parental origin of chromosomes to show that significant differences in relative telomere intensities are frequently observed between chromosomal homologs in short-term stimulated cultures of peripheral blood lymphocytes. These differences appear to be stable for at least 4 months in vivo, but disappear after prolonged proliferation in vitro. The telomere length differences are also stable during in vitro growth of telomerase-negative fibroblast cells but can be abolished by exogenous telomerase expression in these cells. These findings suggest the existence of a mechanism maintaining differences in telomere length between chromosome homologs that is independent of telomere length itself.

SUBMITTER: Londono-Vallejo JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC55832 | biostudies-literature | 2001 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in telomere length between homologous chromosomes in humans.

Londoño-Vallejo J A JA DerSarkissian H H Cazes L L Thomas G G

Nucleic acids research 20010801 15

Telomeres are important structures for DNA replication and chromosome stability during cell growth. Telomere length has been correlated with the division potential of human cells and has been found to decrease with age in healthy individuals. Nevertheless, telomere lengths within the same cell are heterogeneous and certain chromosome arms typically have either short or long telomeres. Both the origin and the physiological consequences of this heterogeneity in telomere length remain unknown. In t ...[more]

PMID: 11470873

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCondensation differences along the lengths of homologous, mitotic metaphase chromosomes are well known. This study reports molecular cytogenetic data showing quantifiable localized differences in condensation between homologs that are related to differences in accessibility (DA) of associated DNA probe targets. Reproducible DA was observed for ~10% of locus-specific, short (1.5-5 kb) single copy DNA probes used in fluorescence in situ hybridization.ResultsFourteen probes (from chromosomes 1, 5, 9, 11, 15, 17, 22) targeting genic and intergenic regions were developed and hybridized to cells from 10 individuals with cytogenetically-distinguishable homologs. Differences in hybridization between homologs were non-random for 8 genomic regions (RGS7, CACNA1B, GABRA5, SNRPN, HERC2, PMP22:IVS3, ADORA2B:IVS1, ACR) and were not unique to known imprinted domains or specific chromosomes. DNA probes within CCNB1, C9orf66, ADORA2B:Promoter-Ex1, PMP22:IVS4-Ex 5, and intergenic region 1p36.3 showed no DA (equivalent accessibility), while OPCML showed unbiased DA. To pinpoint probe locations, we performed 3D-structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). This showed that genomic regions with DA had 3.3-fold greater volumetric, integrated probe intensities and broad distributions of probe depths along axial and lateral axes of the 2 homologs, compared to a low copy probe target (NOMO1) with equivalent accessibility. Genomic regions with equivalent accessibility were also enriched for epigenetic marks of open interphase chromatin (DNase I HS, H3K27Ac, H3K4me1) to a greater extent than regions with DA.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that DA is non-random and reproducible; it is locus specific, but not unique to known imprinted regions or specific chromosomes. Non-random DA was also shown to be heritable within a 2 generation family. DNA probe volume and depth measurements of hybridized metaphase chromosomes further show locus-specific chromatin accessibility differences by super-resolution 3D-SIM. Based on these data and the analysis of interphase epigenetic marks of genomic intervals with DA, we conclude that there are localized differences in compaction of homologs during mitotic metaphase and that these differences may arise during or preceding metaphase chromosome compaction. Our results suggest new directions for locus-specific structural analysis of metaphase chromosomes, motivated by the potential relationship of these findings to underlying epigenetic changes established during interphase.

Project description:BackgroundChromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2). Little is known about how these compounds act during metaphase. We assessed the effects of these reagents at genomic loci that show reproducible, non-random differences in accessibility to chromatin that distinguish homologous targets by single copy DNA probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (scFISH). By super-resolution 3-D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) and other criteria, the differences correspond to 'differential accessibility' (DA) to these chromosomal regions. At these chromosomal loci, DA of the same homologous chromosome is stable and epigenetic hallmarks of less accessible interphase chromatin are present.ResultsTo understand the basis for DA, we investigate the impact of epigenetic modifiers on these allelic differences in chromatin accessibility between metaphase homologs in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Allelic differences in metaphase chromosome accessibility represent a stable chromatin mark on mitotic metaphase chromosomes. Inhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex reversed DA. Inter-homolog probe fluorescence intensity ratios between chromosomes treated with ICRF-193 were significantly lower than untreated controls. 3D-SIM demonstrated that differences in hybridized probe volume and depth between allelic targets were equalized by this treatment. By contrast, DA was impervious to chromosome decondensation treatments targeting histone modifying enzymes, cytosine methylation, as well as in cells with regulatory defects in chromatid cohesion. These data altogether suggest that DA is a reflection of allelic differences in metaphase chromosome compaction, dictated by the localized catenation state of the chromosome, rather than by other epigenetic marks.ConclusionsInhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex mitigated DA by decreasing DNA superhelicity and axial metaphase chromosome condensation. This has potential implications for the mechanism of preservation of cellular phenotypes that enables the same chromatin structure to be correctly reestablished in progeny cells of the same tissue or individual.

Dataset Information

Differences in telomere length between homologous chromosomes in humans.

Publications

Differences in telomere length between homologous chromosomes in humans.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets