Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time.


ABSTRACT: Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. Readability formulas can estimate how difficult a text is to read. Here, in a corpus consisting of 709,577 abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Our analyses show that this trend is indicative of a growing use of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact both the reproducibility and accessibility of research findings.

SUBMITTER: Plaven-Sigray P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5584989 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time.

Plavén-Sigray Pontus P   Matheson Granville James GJ   Schiffler Björn Christian BC   Thompson William Hedley WH  

eLife 20170905


Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. Readability formulas can estimate how difficult a text is to read. Here, in a corpus consisting of 709,577 abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Our analyses show that this trend is indicative of a growing use of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6681173 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7362948 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7117690 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7783389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10547231 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4357924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3543118 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10662734 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6104455 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7108701 | biostudies-literature