Dataset Information

Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats.

ABSTRACT: One week after President Donald Trump signed a controversial executive order to reduce the influx of refugees to the United States, we conducted a survey experiment to understand American citizens' attitudes toward refugee resettlement. Specifically, we evaluated whether citizens consider the geographic context of the resettlement program (that is, local versus national) and the degree to which they are swayed by media frames that increasingly associate refugees with terrorist threats. Our findings highlight a collective action problem: Participants are consistently less supportive of resettlement within their own communities than resettlement elsewhere in the country. This pattern holds across all measured demographic, political, and geographic subsamples within our data. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that threatening media frames significantly reduce support for both national and local resettlement. Conversely, media frames rebutting the threat posed by refugees have no significant effect. Finally, the results indicate that participants in refugee-dense counties are less responsive to threatening frames, suggesting that proximity to previously settled refugees may reduce the impact of perceived security threats.

SUBMITTER: Ferwerda J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5587019 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats.

Ferwerda Jeremy J Flynn D J DJ Horiuchi Yusaku Y

Science advances 20170906 9

One week after President Donald Trump signed a controversial executive order to reduce the influx of refugees to the United States, we conducted a survey experiment to understand American citizens' attitudes toward refugee resettlement. Specifically, we evaluated whether citizens consider the geographic context of the resettlement program (that is, local versus national) and the degree to which they are swayed by media frames that increasingly associate refugees with terrorist threats. Our findi ...[more]

PMID: 28913425

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRefugees have significant unmet health needs. Delivering services to refugees continues to be problematic in the Australian healthcare system. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the literature exploring refugee perceptions of the Australian healthcare system was performed.MethodsTitles and abstracts of 1610 articles published between 2006 and 2019 were screened, and 147 articles were read in full text. Depending on the type of study, articles were appraised using the Modified Critical Appraisal Tool (developed by authors), the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, or the JBI Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews. Using QSR NVivo 11, articles were coded into descriptive themes and synthesised into analytical themes. An explanatory model was used to synthesise these findings. Confidence in the review findings were assessed with GRADE-CERQual approach.ResultsThe final synthesis included 35 articles consisting of one systematic review, 7 mixed methods studies, and 27 qualitative studies. Only one study was from a regional or rural area. A model incorporating aspects of engagement, access, trust, and privacy can be used to explain the experiences of refugees in using the Australian healthcare system. Refugees struggled to engage with health services due to their unfamiliarity with the health system. Information sharing is needed but this is not always delivered effectively, resulting in disempowerment and loss of autonomy. In response, refugees resorted to familiar means, such as family members and their pre-existing cultural knowledge. At times, this perpetuated their unfamiliarity with the broader health system. Access barriers were also encountered. Trust and privacy are pervasive issues that influenced access and engagement.ConclusionsRefugees face significant barriers in accessing and engaging with healthcare services and often resorted to familiar means to overcome what is unfamiliar. This has implications across all areas of service provision. Health administrators and educators need to consider improving the cultural competency of staff and students. Policymakers need to consider engaging communities and upscale the availability and accessibility of professional language and cultural supports. Research is needed on how these measures can be effectively delivered. There is limited research in remote areas and further evidence is needed in these settings.

Project description:ImportanceA better understanding of the psychosocial health of resettled child and adolescent refugees and associated premigration and postmigration factors may help this population integrate effectively.ObjectiveTo estimate the associations of premigration and postmigration multidomain factors with psychosocial health after resettlement among young refugees of different ages.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study used wave 3 data from the Building a New Life in Australia (BNLA) cohort study, as they represented the first time a BNLA study included a child module targeting children and adolescents in the migrating unit as a nested component of the broader study. The study population consisted of children aged 5 to 10 years and adolescents aged 11 to 17 years. The caregivers of the children, the adolescents themselves, and the adolescents' caregivers were invited to complete the child module. Wave 3 data were collected from October 1, 2015, to February 29, 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from May 10 to September 21, 2022.ExposuresPremigration and postmigration multidomain factors, including individual (child and caregiver), family, school, and community levels, were measured.Main outcomes and measuresSocial and emotional adjustment and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were the dependent variables measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and an 8-item PTSD scale. Weighted multilevel linear or logistic regression models were used.ResultsOf the 220 children aged 5 to 10 years (mean [SD] age, 7.4 [2.0] years), 117 (53.2%) were boys; of the 412 adolescents aged 11 to 17 years (mean [SD] age, 14.1 [2.0] years), 215 (52.2%) were boys. Among the children, compared with no exposure, exposure to premigration traumatic events (β = 2.68 [95% CI, 0.51-4.85]) and having family conflicts after resettlement (β = 6.30 [95% CI, 2.97-9.64]) were positively associated with SDQ total difficulties score; school achievement was negatively associated with SDQ total difficulties score (β = -5.02 [95% CI, -9.17 to -0.87]). Among the adolescents, being treated unfairly (β = 3.32 [95% CI, 1.41-5.22]) and parenting harshness after resettlement (β = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.11-0.40]) were positively associated with SDQ total difficulties score; engagement in extracurricular activities (β = -3.67 [95% CI, -6.83 to -0.50]) was negatively associated with SDQ total difficulties score. Exposure to premigration traumatic events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.49 [95% CI, 1.10-5.63]), being treated unfairly (aOR, 3.77 [95% CI, 1.60-8.91]), and facing English language barriers (aOR, 6.41 [95% CI, 1.98-20.79]) after resettlement were positively associated with the presence of PTSD.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study of refugee children and adolescents, apart from premigration traumatic experiences, several postmigration family- and school-related factors and social integration factors were associated with psychosocial health after resettlement. The findings suggest that family- and school-centered psychosocial care and social integration programs targeting related stressors merit increased attention for improving the psychosocial health of refugee children and adolescents after resettlement.

Project description:BackgroundRefugee resettlement offices are the first point of contact for newly arrived refugees and play a significant role in helping refugees acclimate and settle into life in the United States. Available literature suggests that refugee women are vulnerable to poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, including sexually transmitted infections and HIV infections as well as adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about the role that refugee resettlement offices play in supporting refugee women's SRH. This study examines the capacity and interest of resettlement offices in providing SRH information and referrals to newly arrived refugees.Methods and findingsThe research team conducted an online survey of staff members at refugee resettlement offices throughout the US in 2018 to determine (1) available SRH resources and workshops; (2) referrals to and assistance with making appointments for SRH and primary care appointments; (3) barriers to addressing SRH needs of clients; and (4) interest in building the capacity of office staff to address SRH issues. The survey was created for this study and had not been previously used or validated. Survey data underwent descriptive analysis. A total of 236 resettlement offices were contacted, with responses from 100 offices, for a total response rate of 42%. Fifteen percent (N = 15) of refugee resettlement agencies (RRAs) who responded to the survey provide materials about SRH to clients, and 49% (N = 49) incorporate sexual health into the classes they provide to newly arrived refugee clients. Moreover, 12% (N = 12) of responding RRAs screen clients for pregnancy intention, and 20% (N = 20) directly refer to contraceptive care and services. This study is limited by the response rate of the survey; no conclusions can be drawn about those offices that did not respond. In addition, the survey instrument was not validated against any other sources of information about the practices of refugee resettlement offices.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed that many resettlement offices do not routinely provide information or referrals for SRH needs. Responding offices cite lack of time and competing priorities as major barriers to providing SRH education and referrals to clients.

Dataset Information

Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats.

Publications

Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets