Simple rules can guide whether land- or ocean-based conservation will best benefit marine ecosystems.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Coastal marine ecosystems can be managed by actions undertaken both on the land and in the ocean. Quantifying and comparing the costs and benefits of actions in both realms is therefore necessary for efficient management. Here, we quantify the link between terrestrial sediment runoff and a downstream coastal marine ecosystem and contrast the cost-effectiveness of marine- and land-based conservation actions. We use a dynamic land- and sea-scape model to determine whether limited funds should be directed to 1 of 4 alternative conservation actions-protection on land, protection in the ocean, restoration on land, or restoration in the ocean-to maximise the extent of light-dependent marine benthic habitats across decadal timescales. We apply the model to a case study for a seagrass meadow in Au
SUBMITTER: Saunders MI
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5587113 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA