Dataset Information

Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term outcome after total knee replacement: A prospective, observational, multicentre study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Perioperative regional anaesthesia may protect from persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) and improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). OBJECTIVES:Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of regional anaesthesia on PPSP and long-term functional outcome after TKA. DESIGN:A web-based prospective observational registry. SETTING:Five Italian Private and University Hospitals from 2012 to 2015. PATIENTS:Undergoing primary unilateral TKA, aged more than 18 years, informed consent, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classes 1 to 3, no previous knee surgery. INTERVENTION(S):Personal data (age, sex, BMI and ASA class), preoperative pain assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and risk factors for PPSP were registered preoperatively. Data on anaesthetic and analgesic techniques were collected. Postoperative pain (NRS), analgesic consumption, major complications and patient satisfaction were registered up to the time of discharge. PPSP was assessed by a blinded investigator during a phone call after 1, 3 and 6 months, together with patient satisfaction, quality of life (QOL) and walking ability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Experience of PPSP according to the type of peri-operative analgesia. RESULTS:Five hundred sixty-three patients completed the follow-up. At 6 months, 21.6% of patients experienced PPSP, whereas autonomy was improved only in 56.3%; QOL was worsened or unchanged in 30.7% of patients and improved in 69.3%. Patients receiving continuous regional anaesthesia (epidural or peripheral nerve block) showed a lower NRS through the whole peri-operative period up to 1 month compared with both single shot peripheral nerve block and those who did not receive any type of regional anaesthesia. No difference was found between these latter two groups. Differences in PPSP at 3 or 6 months were not significantly affected by the type of anaesthesia or postoperative analgesia. A higher NRS score at 1 month, younger age, history of anxiety or depression, pro-inflammatory status, higher BMI and a lower ASA physical status were associated with a higher incidence of PPSP and worsened QOL at 6 months. CONCLUSION:Continuous regional anaesthesia provides analgesic benefit for up to 1 month after surgery, but did not influence PPSP at 6 months. Better pain control at 1 month was associated with reduced PPSP. Patients with higher expectations from surgery, enhanced basal inflammation and a pessimistic outlook are more prone to develop PPSP. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02147730.

SUBMITTER: Bugada D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5588609 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term outcome after total knee replacement: A prospective, observational, multicentre study.

Bugada Dario D Allegri Massimo M Gemma Marco M Ambrosoli Andrea L AL Gazzerro Giuseppe G Chiumiento Fernando F Dongu Doriana D Nobili Fiorella F Fanelli Andrea A Ferrua Paolo P Berruto Massimo M Cappelleri Gianluca G

European journal of anaesthesiology 20171001 10

<h4>Background</h4>Perioperative regional anaesthesia may protect from persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) and improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).<h4>Objectives</h4>Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of regional anaesthesia on PPSP and long-term functional outcome after TKA.<h4>Design</h4>A web-based prospective observational registry.<h4>Setting</h4>Five Italian Private and University Hospitals from 2012 to 2015.<h4>Patients</h4>Undergoing primary unilateral TKA, aged ...[more]

PMID: 28767456

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe increasing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKR) and the initiatives to reduce health care spending have put the responsibility for efficient care on hospitals and providers. Multidisciplinary care pathways have been shown to shorten length of stay and result in improved short-term outcomes. However, common problems such as post-op nausea, orthostasis, and quad weakness remain, while reliance on discharge to rehabilitation facilities may also prolong hospital stay.Questions/purposesOur aim was to document that combined modifications of our traditional clinical pathway for unilateral TKR could lead to improved short-term outcomes. We pose the following research questions. Can pathway modifications which include intra-articular infusion and saphenous nerve block (SNB) provide adequate pain relief and eliminate common side effects promoting earlier mobilization? Can planning for discharge to home avoid in-patient rehab stays? Can these combined modifications decrease length of stay even in patients with complex comorbidities indicated by higher ASA class? Will discharge to home incur an increase in complications or a failure to achieve knee range of motion?Patients and methodsA retrospective review was performed and identified two cohorts. Group A included 116 patients that underwent unilateral TKR for osteoarthritis between August 2009 and August 2010. Group B included 171 patients that underwent unilateral TKR for osteoarthritis between February 2012 to February 2013. Group A patients were treated with spinal anesthesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA)/femoral nerve block (FNB) for the first 48 h after surgery. Discharge planning was initiated after admission. Group B had spinal anesthesia with SNB and received a continuous intra-articular infusion of 0.2% ropivicaine for 48 h post-op. Discharge planning was initiated with a case manager prior to hospitalization and discharge to home was declared the preferred approach. An intensive home PT program was made available through a program with our local home care agency. Outcomes assessed and compared between groups included length of stay, incidence of post-op nausea, dizziness, in-hospital falls, occurrence of complications including wound infection and the recovery of range of motion at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year post-op.ResultsPain control was similar between the groups but Group B had fewer side effects. With the new pathway, length of stay (LOS) was reduced from 4.32 to 3.64 days with a similar LOS reduction across all ASA classes. There was no increase in Group B wound or other complications. Return of ROM was similar between groups.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that replacing PCEA and FNB with intra-articular analgesia with a SNB allows for improved early recovery following TKR. That, combined with pre-op discharge planning and initiation of an intensive home PT program, reduced average length of stay.

Project description:BackgroundA superior analgesic method in perioperative pain-management of patients receiving total knee arthroplasty is the subject of controversial debate. Although higher cost-efficiency is claimed for the local infiltration analgesia (LIA), there is a lack of data on its costs compared to peripheral nerve block anaesthesia (PNBA). The goal of this study was to investigate the differences in immediate perioperative costs between the LIA and PNBA in treatment of patients receiving total knee arthroplasty.MethodsThe comparison was conducted based on a randomized controlled clinical trial examining 40 patients with elective, primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, 20 patients with LIA and 20 patients with PNBA). The analysis included surgical case costs, anaesthesiological case costs, material, costs of postoperative opioid requirements and catheter review visits for patients receiving PNBA.ResultsThe overall mean costs for the LIA-group were 4328.72€ and 4368.12€ for the PNBA (p = 0.851). While there was no statistically significant difference in surgical case costs, the anaesthesiological costs were lower with the LIA procedure (1370.26€ vs. 1542.45€, p = 0.048). Material costs in the LIA group were 4.18€/patient and 94.64€/patient with the PNBA. Costs for postoperative opioid requirements showed no statistically significant difference between the two procedures.ConclusionsThere is no relevant difference in immediate perioperative costs between LIA and PNBA. Shorter induction times lead to lower anaesthesiological case costs with the LIA. Overall economic aspects seem to play a less important role for determining an adequate procedure for perioperative pain management.Trial registrationThe study was approved by the ethics-review-board of Charité Hospital Berlin (Ethikausschuss 4, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, on 16th February 2017) and registered with data safety authorities. Study patients provided written informed consent to participate in the trial. Study registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03114306 .

Project description:BACKGROUND:Postoperative outcomes following major surgery are influenced by surgical and anaesthesiological factors. While techniques of minimal invasive surgery have been associated with improved outcome, the techniques of minimal invasive, multimodal anaesthesia have not been adequately investigated. The aim of this study was to compare intrathecally based anaesthesia (ITA) including standardized, traditional intraoperative and postoperative care, with, general anaesthesia (GA) combined with intraoperative glucocorticoids, exclusion of intraoperative tourniquet and indwelling urethral catheter, and, an accelerated postoperative care regime. Outcome variables in the study were pain, requirement of analgesics, global satisfaction score and length-of-hospital stay. METHODS:Sixty patients were included and randomized to the ITA or the GA group. The ITA group received intrathecal bupivacaine (12.5 - 15.0 mg)/morphine (0.1 mg)/clonidine (0.03 mg), a standard surgical procedure, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine (110 mg) /epinephrine (0.5 mg)/morphine (10 mg), an indwelling urethral catheter and mobilization with start Day 1 after the surgery. The GA group received a target-controlled infusion of propofol/remifentanil, betamethasone 4 mg i.v. intraoperatively, surgery was performed without a tourniquet, an indwelling urethral catheter was not used, LIA was with ropivacaine (250 mg)/epinephrine (0.3 mg) and mobilization was planned with start ? 2 hrs. after end of surgery. Outcomes were followed daily for the first 96 hrs. and at visits 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS:Requirement of analgesics was decreased in the ITA group in the immediate postoperative period (P < 0.05). Pain scores were significantly lower in the ITA group (P < 0.01) between 0 - 12 hrs and in the GA group (P < 0.05) between 12 - 24 hrs after surgery. Fifteen of the patients in the GA group had to be intermittent catheterized due to bladder volumes > 400 mL. The LOS in the ITA group was significantly longer compared to the GA group (P < 0.01). There was no difference in global satisfaction score. CONCLUSION:General anaesthesia combined with intraoperative glucocorticoids and accelerated postoperative care, compared with, intrathecal blockade and traditional postoperative care, seems to generate the same overall pain ratings and a decrease in length-of-hospital stay, in patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Regional analgesia is more effective than conventional analgesia for controlling pain and may facilitate rehabilitation after large joint replacement in the short term. It remains unclear if regional anaesthesia improves functional outcomes after joint replacement beyond three months after surgery. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects of regional anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term functional outcomes 3, 6 and 12 months after elective major joint (knee, shoulder and hip) replacement surgery. SEARCH METHODS:We performed an electronic search of several databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL), and handsearched reference lists and conference abstracts. We updated our search in June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regional analgesia versus conventional analgesia in patients undergoing total shoulder, hip or knee replacement. We included studies that reported a functional outcome with a follow-up of at least three months after surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS:We included six studies with 350 participants followed for at least three months. All of these studies enrolled participants undergoing total knee replacement. Studies were at least partially blinded. Three studies had a high risk of performance bias and one a high risk of attrition bias, but the risk of bias was otherwise unclear or low.Only one study assessed joint function using a global score. Due to heterogeneity in outcome and reporting, we could only pool three out of six RCTs, with range of motion assessed at three months after surgery used as a surrogate for joint function. All studies had a high risk of detection bias. Using the random-effects model, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups (mean difference 3.99 degrees, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 2.23 to 10.21; P value = 0.21, 3 studies, 140 participants, very low quality evidence).We did not perform further analyses because immediate adverse effects were not part of the explicit outcomes of any of these typically small studies, and long-term adverse events after regional anaesthesia are rare.None of the included studies elicited or reported long-term adverse effects like persistent nerve damage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:More high-quality studies are needed to establish the effects of regional analgesia on function after major joint replacement, as well as on the risk of adverse events (falls).

Dataset Information

Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term outcome after total knee replacement: A prospective, observational, multicentre study.

Publications

Effects of anaesthesia and analgesia on long-term outcome after total knee replacement: A prospective, observational, multicentre study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets