A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Perioperative interventions, targeted to increase global blood flow defined by explicit measured goals, reduce postoperative complications. Consequently, reliable non-invasive estimation of the cardiac output could have far-reaching benefit.

Methods

This study compared a non-invasive Doppler device - the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) - with the oesophageal Doppler monitor (ODM), on 25 patients during major abdominal surgery. Stroke volume was determined by USCOM (SV_USCOM) and ODM (SV_ODM) pre and post fluid challenges.

Results

A ≥ 10% change (Δ) SV_USCOM had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 88% to detect a ≥ 10% Δ SV_ODM; the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.99). Concordance was 98%, using an exclusion zone of <10% Δ SV_ODM. 135 measurements gave median SV_USCOM 80 ml (interquartile range 65-93 ml) and SV_ODM 86 ml (69-100 ml); mean bias was 5.9 ml (limits of agreement -20 to +30 ml) and percentage error 30%.

Conclusions

Following fluid challenges SV_USCOM showed good concordance and accurately discriminated a change ≥10% in SV_ODM.

SUBMITTER: Hodgson LE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5606393 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature