Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

15 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Reply to the Comment by Littlechild and Isupov.

ABSTRACT: I thank Drs. Littlechild and Isupov for their recent comments, which are considered below. Before addressing these specifically, their correspondence raises two more general issues which require initial clarification.[...].

SUBMITTER: Willetts A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5620646 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Reply to the Comment by Littlechild and Isupov.

Willetts Andrew A Kelly David D

Microorganisms 20170906 3

I thank Drs. Littlechild and Isupov for their recent comments, which are considered below. Before addressing these specifically, their correspondence raises two more general issues which require initial clarification.[...]. ...[more]

PMID: 28878173

Similar Datasets

Reply to comment on: The Gabrin sign.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7834497 | biostudies-literature

Reply to a Comment on "The Nature of Chalcogen-Bonding-Type Tellurium-Nitrogen Interactions".

Project description:We reply to the comment by J.-M. Mewes, A. Hansen and S. Grimme (MHG), who challenged the accuracy of our re value for the N⋅⋅⋅Te distance in (C6 F5 )Te(CH2 )3 NMe2 determined by gas electron diffraction (GED). We conclusively demonstrate that MHG's quoted reference calculations are less accurate than they claim for solid state and gas phase. We show by higher level calculations, that we did not miss substantial contributions from open-chain conformers. Refinements on simulated scattering data show that such contributions would have had only an almost negligible effect on re (N⋅⋅⋅Te). MHG suggested the use of a H0-tuned GFN method for calculating vibrational corrections ra -re , but this did not change these values substantially. Alternative amplitude calculations using higher level analytic harmonic and numeric cubic force fields (PBE0-D3BJ/def2-TZVP) yield a GED value for re (N⋅⋅⋅Te)=2.852(25) Å that is well within the experimental error of our original value 2.918(31) Å but far from the 2.67(8) Å predicted by MHG. A now improved error estimation accounts for inaccuracies in the calculated auxiliary values. The gas/solid difference of the weak N⋅⋅⋅Te interaction is in a realistic range compared to other systems involving weak chemical interactions.

| S-EPMC8251573 | biostudies-literature

Reply: "Comment on: Endogenous Ouabain and Related Genes in the Translation from Hypertension to Renal Diseases".

Project description:In his recent letter, Dr [...].

| S-EPMC6387140 | biostudies-literature

Reply to 'Comment on 'Dairy, calcium, vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk in African-American women''.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6048032 | biostudies-literature

Reply to: "Comment on "Autoimmune hepatitis developing after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine: Causality or casualty?"".

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8272678 | biostudies-literature

Reply to: "Comment on "Quality of life and unmet needs in patients with chronic liver disease: A mixed-method systematic review"".

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8693004 | biostudies-literature

Comment on: The sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio in pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis: impact of disease activity and sulfasalazine use. Reply.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8824423 | biostudies-literature

Reply to comment on Couzi <i>et al</i>. (2018): a phenomenological model for structural phase transitions in incommensurate alkane/urea inclusion compounds.

Project description:In a recent paper (Couzi et al. 2018 R. Soc. open sci. 5, 180058. (doi:10.1098/rsos.180058)), we proposed a new phenomenological model to account for the I?II?"III" phase sequence in incommensurate n-alkane/urea inclusion compounds, which represents an alternative interpretation to that proposed in work of Toudic et al. In a Comment (Toudic et al. 2019 R. Soc. open sci. 6, 182073. (doi:10.1098/rsos.182073)), Toudic et al. have questioned our assignment of the superspace group of phase II of n-nonadecane/urea, which they have previously assigned, based on a (3 + 2)-dimensional superspace, as C2221(00?)(10?). In this Reply, we present new results from a comprehensive synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of n-nonadecane/urea, involving measurements as a detailed function of temperature across the I?II?"III" phase transition sequence. Our results demonstrate conclusively that "main reflections" (h, k, l, 0) with h+k odd are observed in phase II of n-nonadecane/urea (including temperatures in phase II that are just below the transition from phase I to phase II), in full support of our assignment of the (3+1)-dimensional superspace group P212121(00?) to phase II. As our phenomenological model is based on phase II and phase "III" of this incommensurate material having the same (3+1)-dimensional superspace group P212121(00?), it follows that the new X-ray diffraction results are in full support of our phenomenological model.

| S-EPMC6731733 | biostudies-literature

Reply to comment on Howard <i>et al</i>. (2019): 'Nothing to dance about: unclear evidence for symbolic representations and numerical competence in honeybees'.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7211442 | biostudies-literature

Reply.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7832665 | biostudies-literature