Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.


ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing (versus Papanicolaou (Pap)-based screening) for cervical cancer screening in Nicaragua.

Design

A previously developed Monte Carlo simulation model of the natural history of HPV infection and cervical cancer was calibrated to epidemiological data from Nicaragua. Cost data inputs were derived using a micro-costing approach in Carazo, Chontales and Chinandega departments; test performance data were from a demonstration project in Masaya department.

Setting

Nicaragua's public health sector facilities.

Participants

Women aged 30-59 years.

Interventions

Screening strategies included (1) Pap testing every 3 years, with referral to colposcopy for women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse result ('Pap'); (2) HPV testing every 5 years, with referral to cryotherapy for HPV-positive eligible women (HPV cryotherapy or 'HPV-Cryo'); (3) HPV testing every 5 years, with referral to triage with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for HPV-positive women ('HPV-VIA'); and (4) HPV testing every 5 years, with referral to Pap testing for HPV-positive women ('HPV-Pap').

Outcome measures

Reduction in lifetime risk of cancer and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER; 2015 US$ per year of life saved (YLS)).

Results

HPV-based screening strategies were more effective than Pap testing. HPV-Cryo was the least costly and most effective strategy, reducing lifetime cancer risk by 29.5% and outperforming HPV-VIA, HPV-Pap and Pap only, which reduced cancer risk by 19.4%, 12.2% and 10.8%, respectively. With an ICER of US$320/YLS, HPV-Cryo every 5 years would be very cost-effective using a threshold based on Nicaragua's per capita gross domestic product of US$2090. Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses on test performance, coverage, compliance and cost parameters.

Conclusions

HPV testing is very cost-effective compared with Pap testing in Nicaragua, due to higher test sensitivity and the relatively lower number of visits required. Increasing compliance with recommended follow-up will further improve the health benefits and value for public health dollars.

SUBMITTER: Campos NG 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5623348 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.

Campos Nicole G NG   Mvundura Mercy M   Jeronimo Jose J   Holme Francesca F   Vodicka Elisabeth E   Kim Jane J JJ  

BMJ open 20170615 6


<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing (versus Papanicolaou (Pap)-based screening) for cervical cancer screening in Nicaragua.<h4>Design</h4>A previously developed Monte Carlo simulation model of the natural history of HPV infection and cervical cancer was calibrated to epidemiological data from Nicaragua. Cost data inputs were derived using a micro-costing approach in Carazo, Chontales and Chinandega departments; test performance data wer  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4732771 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6988124 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7526933 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5633754 | biostudies-literature