Dataset Information

Neuroticism and Individual Differences in Neural Function in Unmedicated Major Depression: Findings from the EMBARC Study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Personality dysfunction represents one of the only predictors of differential response between active treatments for depression to have replicated. In this study, we examine whether depressed patients with higher neuroticism scores, a marker of personality dysfunction, show differences versus depressed patients with lower scores in the functioning of two brain regions associated with treatment response, the anterior cingulate and anterior insula cortices. METHODS:Functional magnetic resonance imaging data during an emotional Stroop task were collected from 135 adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder at four academic medical centers participating in the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) study. Secondary analyses were conducted including a sample of 28 healthy individuals. RESULTS:In whole-brain analyses, higher neuroticism among depressed adults was associated with increased activity in and connectivity with the right anterior insula cortex to incongruent compared to congruent emotional stimuli (ks>281, ps<0.05 FWE corrected), covarying for concurrent psychiatric distress. We also observed an unanticipated relationship between neuroticism and reduced activity in the precuneus (k=269, p<0.05 FWE corrected). Exploratory analyses including healthy individuals suggested that associations between neuroticism and brain function may be nonlinear over the full range of neuroticism scores. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides convergent evidence for the importance of the right anterior insula cortex as a brain-based marker of clinically meaningful individual differences in neuroticism among adults with depression. This is a critical next step in linking personality dysfunction, a replicated clinical predictor of differential antidepressant treatment response, with differences in underlying brain function.

SUBMITTER: Fournier JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5624319 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neuroticism and Individual Differences in Neural Function in Unmedicated Major Depression: Findings from the EMBARC Study.

Fournier Jay C JC Chase Henry W HW Greenberg Tsafrir T Etkin Amit A Almeida Jorge R JR Stiffler Richelle R Deckersbach Thilo T Weyandt Sarah S Cooper Crystal C Toups Marisa M Carmody Tom T Kurian Benji B Peltier Scott S Adams Phillip P McInnis Melvin G MG Oquendo Maria A MA McGrath Patrick J PJ Fava Maurizio M Weissman Myrna M Parsey Ramin R Trivedi Madhukar H MH Phillips Mary L ML

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 20161206 2

<h4>Background</h4>Personality dysfunction represents one of the only predictors of differential response between active treatments for depression to have replicated. In this study, we examine whether depressed patients with higher neuroticism scores, a marker of personality dysfunction, show differences versus depressed patients with lower scores in the functioning of two brain regions associated with treatment response, the anterior cingulate and anterior insula cortices.<h4>Methods</h4>Functi ...[more]

PMID: 28983519

Similar Datasets

Project description:Anhedonia, disrupted reward processing, is a core symptom of major depressive disorder. Recent findings demonstrate altered reward-related ventral striatal reactivity in depressed individuals, but the extent to which this is specific to anhedonia remains poorly understood. The authors examined the effect of anhedonia on reward expectancy (expected outcome value) and prediction error- (discrepancy between expected and actual outcome) related ventral striatal reactivity, as well as the relationship between these measures.A total of 148 unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder and 31 healthy comparison individuals recruited for the multisite EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care) study underwent functional MRI during a well-validated reward task. Region of interest and whole-brain data were examined in the first- (N=78) and second- (N=70) recruited cohorts, as well as the total sample, of depressed individuals, and in healthy individuals.Healthy, but not depressed, individuals showed a significant inverse relationship between reward expectancy and prediction error-related right ventral striatal reactivity. Across all participants, and in depressed individuals only, greater anhedonia severity was associated with a reduced reward expectancy-prediction error inverse relationship, even after controlling for other symptoms.The normal reward expectancy and prediction error-related ventral striatal reactivity inverse relationship concords with conditioning models, predicting a shift in ventral striatal responding from reward outcomes to reward cues. This study shows, for the first time, an absence of this relationship in two cohorts of unmedicated depressed individuals and a moderation of this relationship by anhedonia, suggesting reduced reward-contingency learning with greater anhedonia. These findings help elucidate neural mechanisms of anhedonia, as a step toward identifying potential biosignatures of treatment response.

Project description:Recent observations suggest a role of the volume of the cerebral ventricle volume, corpus callosum (CC) segment volume, in particular that of the central-anterior part, and choroid plexus (CP) volume for treatment resistance of major depressive disorder (MDD). An increased CP volume has been associated with increased inflammatory activity and changes in the structure of the ventricles and corpus callosum. We attempt to replicate and confirm that these imaging markers are associated with clinical outcome in subjects from the EMBARC study, as implied by a recent pilot study. The EMBARC study is a placebo controlled randomized study comparing sertraline vs. placebo in patients with MDD to identify biological markers of therapy resistance. Association of baseline volumes of the lateral ventricles (LVV), choroid plexus volume (CPV) and volume of segments of the CC with treatment response after 4 weeks treatment was evaluated. 171 subjects (61 male, 110 female) completed the 4 week assessments; gender and age were taken into account for this analyses. As previously reported, no treatment effect of sertraline vs. placebo was observed, therefore the study characterized prognostic markers of response in the pooled population. Change in depression severity was identified by the ratio of the Hamilton-Depression rating scale 17 (HAMD-17) at week 4 divided by the HAMD-17 at baseline (HAMD-17 ratio). Volumes of the lateral ventricles and choroid plexi were positively correlated with the HAMD-17 ratio, indication worse outcome with larger ventricles and choroid plexus volumes, whereas the volume of the central-anterior corpus callosum was negatively correlated with the HAMD-17 ratio. Responders (n = 54) had significantly smaller volumes of the lateral ventricles and CP compared to non-responders (n = 117), whereas the volume of mid-anterior CC was significantly larger compared to non-responders (n = 117), confirming our previous findings. In an exploratory way associations between enlarged LVV and CPV and signs of lipid dysregulation were observed. In conclusion, we confirmed that volumes of lateral ventricles, choroid plexi and the mid-anterior corpus callosum are associated with clinical improvement of depression and may be indicators of metabolic/inflammatory activity.

Project description:Biometrical genetic studies suggest that the personality dimensions, including neuroticism, are moderately heritable (~0.4 to 0.6). Quantitative analyses that aggregate the effects of many common variants have recently further informed genetic research on European samples. However, there has been limited research to date on non-European populations. This study examined the personality dimensions in a large sample of Han Chinese descent (N=10 064) from the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology study, aimed at identifying genetic risk factors for recurrent major depression among a rigorously ascertained cohort. Heritability of neuroticism as measured by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) was estimated to be low but statistically significant at 10% (s.e.=0.03, P=0.0001). In addition to EPQ, neuroticism based on a three-factor model, data for the Big Five (BF) personality dimensions (neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion and agreeableness) measured by the Big Five Inventory were available for controls (n=5596). Heritability estimates of the BF were not statistically significant despite high power (>0.85) to detect heritabilities of 0.10. Polygenic risk scores constructed by best linear unbiased prediction weights applied to split-half samples failed to significantly predict any of the personality traits, but polygenic risk for neuroticism, calculated with LDpred and based on predictive variants previously identified from European populations (N=171 911), significantly predicted major depressive disorder case-control status (P=0.0004) after false discovery rate correction. The scores also significantly predicted EPQ neuroticism (P=6.3 × 10-6). Factor analytic results of the measures indicated that any differences in heritabilities across samples may be due to genetic variation or variation in haplotype structure between samples, rather than measurement non-invariance. Findings demonstrate that neuroticism can be significantly predicted across ancestry, and highlight the importance of studying polygenic contributions to personality in non-European populations.

Dataset Information

Neuroticism and Individual Differences in Neural Function in Unmedicated Major Depression: Findings from the EMBARC Study.

Publications

Neuroticism and Individual Differences in Neural Function in Unmedicated Major Depression: Findings from the EMBARC Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets