Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic value of CA19.9, circulating tumour DNA and circulating tumour cells in patients with solid pancreatic tumours.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs).

Methods

We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for each marker and their combination.

Results

SPTs corresponded to 58 malignant tumours (52 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and 6 others) and 10 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for PA diagnosis were 73% and 88% for EUS-FNA, 67% and 80% for CTC, 65% and 75% for ctDNA and 79% and 93% for CA19.9, respectively. The positivity of at least 2 markers was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 91%, respectively. CtDNA was the only marker associated with overall survival (median 5.2 months for ctDNA+ vs 11.0 months for ctDNA-, P=0.01).

Conclusions

CA19.9 alone and in combination with ctDNA and/or CTC analysis may represent an efficient method for diagnosing PA in patients with SPTs. Further studies including a larger cohort of patients with both malignant and benign lesions will be necessary to confirm these promising results.

SUBMITTER: Sefrioui D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5625666 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<h4>Background</h4>The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs).<h4>Methods</h4>We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7285991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4931379 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9285714 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5641111 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5675628 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10493362 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8810868 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3387824 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6125476 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4834815 | biostudies-other