Dataset Information

Challenging the standard of care in advanced melanoma: focus on pembrolizumab.

ABSTRACT: The last several years have seen a dramatic rise in the number of effective therapies that have been shown to improve survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. Among these treatments are the immune checkpoint inhibitors, a new class of immunotherapy, that have demonstrated the ability to improve both response rates and survival outcomes. Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the negative regulatory PD-1 receptor on T-cell lymphocytes, has shown improved efficacy compared to standard therapies with an acceptable tolerability profile. Additionally, this agent is being evaluated in adjuvant and combination trial strategies that have great potential to further advance outcomes. This review focuses on the advances that pembrolizumab has made in melanoma and what studies are upcoming that could change the future of melanoma treatment yet again.

SUBMITTER: Abdul-Karim RM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5626384 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Challenging the standard of care in advanced melanoma: focus on pembrolizumab.

Abdul-Karim Raghad M RM Cowey C Lance CL

Cancer management and research 20170925

The last several years have seen a dramatic rise in the number of effective therapies that have been shown to improve survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. Among these treatments are the immune checkpoint inhibitors, a new class of immunotherapy, that have demonstrated the ability to improve both response rates and survival outcomes. Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the negative regulatory PD-1 receptor on T-cell lymphocytes, has shown improved efficacy ...[more]

PMID: 29026335

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTreatment-free survival (TFS) represents an alternative time-to-event end point, accurately characterizing time spent free of systemic therapy, providing a more patient-centric view of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy regimens. There remains a lack of studies evaluating TFS outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma who are receiving immunotherapy, especially outside of the clinical trial setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate TFS outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma receiving first-line ICI therapy outside of a clinical trial setting.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter cohort study of patients with advanced melanoma receiving first-line ICI therapy between August 1, 2013, and May 31, 2020, was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Data analysis was performed in August 2022.ExposuresPatients received standard-of-care, first-line ICI therapy treatment regimens including single-agent nivolumab, single-agent pembrolizumab, or ipilimumab-nivolumab.Main outcomes and measuresTreatment-free survival was defined as the difference in the 36-month restricted mean survival time between 2 conventional survival end points: (1) time from treatment initiation to ICI cessation, death, or censoring at last follow-up and (2) time from treatment initiation to subsequent systemic anticancer therapy, death, or censoring at last follow-up.ResultsA total of 316 patients with advanced melanoma receiving first-line nivolumab (n = 51; median age, 66 years [IQR, 56-78 years]; 31 men [60.8%]), pembrolizumab (n = 158; median age, 69 years [IQR, 60-78 years]; 112 men [70.9%]), or combination nivolumab-ipilimumab (n = 107; median age, 53 years [IQR, 42-60 years]; 72 men [67.3%]) were included. Treatment groups were similar with regard to sex, primary tumor location, and presence of metastasis, although patients receiving combination nivolumab-ipilimumab had a lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, were younger, and were more likely to be BRAF V600E positive than those receiving anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy. The restricted mean TFS was longer for nivolumab-ipilimumab (12.4 months [95% CI, 8.8-16.0 months]) compared with nivolumab (8.9 months [95% CI, 4.4-13.5 months]) and pembrolizumab (11.1 months [95% CI, 8.5-13.8 months]). During the 36-month follow-up interval, patients treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab spent 34.4% of their time (12.4 of 36 months) not receiving systemic anticancer treatments compared with 30.8% (11.1 of 36 months) and 24.7% (8.9 of 36 months) of the time for the pembrolizumab and nivolumab treatment groups, respectively.Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study of patients with advanced melanoma receiving first-line ICI therapy suggests that TFS represents a patient-centric, informative end point. Patients treated with combination nivolumab-ipilimumab spent more time alive and free from systemic anticancer therapy than those treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy alone.

Project description:IntroductionGenetic alterations of KIT gene are known to be one of the major causes of melanoma. Those are more common in the mucous and acral subtypes and KIT is regarded as major oncogene in Asian melanomas, where the prevalence of these subtypes is high. Up to date, several clinical trials have been conducted to target KIT gene alterations in melanoma with unsatisfied efficacies. Imatinib mesylate, a small-molecule inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase, provides a rapid but not durable clinical response in KIT-mutant melanoma. Meanwhile, recent basic and clinical evidence have revealed another aspect of KIT-targeted therapy, namely the enhancement of antitumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we designed clinical trial of co-administrating imatinib mesylate and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) to evaluate its safety and efficacy.Methods and analysisThis is an open-label, single-arm, phase I/II clinical trial involving Japanese patients with metastatic KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy including anti-PD-1 therapy. Phase I study is a dose-escalation study comprising two dose levels of imatinib mesylate (200 and 400 mg/day, respectively) with fixed dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoint of the phase II study is the objective response rate after 4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of pembrolizumab and imatinib mesylate at the dose determined in phase I, based on RECIST version 1.1. A Simon's minimax two-stage design is employed to test the null hypothesis of a 5% response rate vs 30% alternative, which will be rejected when a lower confidence limit of two-sided 90% confidence interval of true response rate is over than threshold response rate. The secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, best overall response and incidence of adverse events. Totally, a target size of 22 patients will be expected.DiscussionIf this study shows efficacy and acceptable safety profile, it will contribute to the development of novel treatment option for patients with KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy.Trial registrationNCT04546074. Date of Registration: September 11, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546074). Date of First Participant Enrollment: December 23, 2020.

Dataset Information

Challenging the standard of care in advanced melanoma: focus on pembrolizumab.

Publications

Challenging the standard of care in advanced melanoma: focus on pembrolizumab.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets