Dataset Information

A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Way Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Temozolomide 200 mg/m2 (Dralitem® vs. Temodal® Capsules) in Patients with Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System Under Fasting Conditions.

ABSTRACT: Temozolomide is an antineoplastic agent of proven efficacy against high-grade gliomas.The objective of this crossover, single-dose, bioequivalence study was to compare the rate and extent of absorption of oral temozolomide after administration of the study product (Dralitem®, Monte Verde Sociedad Anónima) and the reference product (Temodal®, originator product manufactured by Schering Plough Laboratories) in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors under fasting conditions.Sixteen male and female subjects with primary CNS tumors (excluding CNS lymphoma) were recruited, and were administered temozolomide 200 mg/m2 (Dralitem®) on days 1, 2 and 5 of a 5-day treatment. On days 3 and 4, subjects received the same dose of the test product (Dralitem®), or the reference product (Temodal®) on alternate days. The single dose of 200 mg/m2 was reached with three different temozolomide capsule strengths: 20, 100 and 250 mg. On days 3 and 4, blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation after drug administration.Bioequivalence assessment was made for the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of log-transformed means (?T/?R) of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC from time zero to the final quantifiable sample [AUCt] and AUC from time zero to infinity [AUC?]) and maximum concentration (C max) of both the test (Dralitem®) and reference (Temodal®) products. The point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of C max, AUCt and AUC? values were 94.37 (82.69-107.69), 100.99 (97.81-104.28) and 101.53 (98.60-104.54), respectively. The ratio met the predefined bioequivalence criteria (i.e. 90% CI between 80.00 and 125.00) for C max and AUC. The most commonly reported adverse events (AE) on this study were vomiting, abdominal pain, asthenia and weakness. One subject experienced expressive aphasia, possibly unrelated to the study drug and with no significant sequelae upon recovery. No serious AEs or unexpected AEs were reported.Temozolomide Dralitem® capsules, 20, 100 and 250 mg, were bioequivalent to Temodal® capsules under fasting conditions in patients with CNS primary tumors, supporting that they are therapeutic equivalents. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02343081.

SUBMITTER: Muggeri A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5629139 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Way Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Temozolomide 200 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Dralitem<sup>®</sup> vs. Temodal<sup>®</sup> Capsules) in Patients with Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System Under Fasting Conditions.

Muggeri Alejandro A Vago Miguel M Pérez Sebastián S Rubio Marcelo M González Cecilia C Magariños Cristian C Rosenberg Mónica M Costa Fernando F Pérez-Lloret Santiago S

Drugs in R&D 20170901 3

<h4>Background</h4>Temozolomide is an antineoplastic agent of proven efficacy against high-grade gliomas.<h4>Purpose</h4>The objective of this crossover, single-dose, bioequivalence study was to compare the rate and extent of absorption of oral temozolomide after administration of the study product (Dralitem<sup>®</sup>, Monte Verde Sociedad Anónima) and the reference product (Temodal<sup>®</sup>, originator product manufactured by Schering Plough Laboratories) in patients with primary central n ...[more]

PMID: 28756607

Similar Datasets

Project description:UnlabelledThe present study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of febuxostat in healthy Chinese male volunteers and evaluate whether the two formulations of febuxostat 40-mg and 80-mg tablets are bioequivalent. A randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers under fasting conditions. 24 eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of test or reference formulation of febuxostat 40-mg or 80-mg tablet. The washout period between each administration was 1 week. Plasma febuxostat was quantified by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Tolerability was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, physical examinations, 12-lead ECG and laboratory tests. After single-dosing of 1 tablet of 40-mg febuxostat, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations were: Tmax 1.22±0.87 and 1.85±1.03 h, Cmax 1689.16±461.31 and 1613.80±608.43 ng·mL-1, AUC0-t 5139.87±1349.28 and 5517.91±2024.26 ng·mL-1·h, AUC0-∞ 5263.06±1339.16 and 5640.48±2040.22 ng·mL-1·h, t1/2 4.82±2.61 and 4.85±1.78 h, respectively. After single-dosing of 1 tablet of 80-mg febuxostat, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations were: Tmax 1.71±1.21 and 2.23±1.55 h, Cmax 2744.47±1157.44 and 2998.17±1200.13 ng·mL-1, AUC0-t 9634.03±2768.25 and 10467.95±3501.65 ng·mL-1·h, AUC0-∞ 9834.32±2730.51 and 10626.63±3504.08 ng·mL-1·h, t1/2 6.25±2.44 and 5.46±1.65 h, respectively. For single-dosing of 1 tablet of 40-mg febuxostat, 90% CIs for the test/reference ratio of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 89.79 to 102.55, 90.14 to 102.56 and 93.99 to 129.63, respectively. For single-dosing of 1 tablet of 80-mg febuxostat, 90% CIs for the test/reference ratio of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 86.67 to 100.00, 87.50 to 100.51 and 79.48 to 105.99, respectively. This single dose study revealed similar pharmacokinetic properties in healthy Chinese male volunteers as those found in Caucasic population. The test and reference febuxostat tablets formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence at 40-mg and 80-mg strengths in fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers.Trial registrationChictr.org ChiCTR-TTRCC-14004288.

Project description:The aim of this study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and melphalan 200 mg/m(2) as conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma in the GEM2000 study.The first 225 patients received oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2); because of a high frequency of veno-occlusive disease, the protocol was amended and a further 542 patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2).Engraftment and hospitalization times were similar in both groups. Oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) resulted in higher transplant-related mortality (8.4% versus 3.5%; P=0.002) due to the increased frequency of veno-occlusive disease in this group. Response rates were similar in both arms. With respective median follow-ups of 72 and 47 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer with busulfan plus melphalan (41 versus 31 months; P=0.009), although survival was similar to that in the melphalan 200 mg/m(2) group. However, access to novel agents as salvage therapy after relapse/progression was significantly lower for patients receiving busulfan plus melphalan (43%) than for those receiving melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (58%; P=0.01).Conditioning with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) was associated with longer progression-free survival but equivalent survival to that achieved with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) but this should be counterbalanced against the higher frequency of veno-occlusive disease-related deaths. This latter fact together with the limited access to novel salvage therapies in patients conditioned with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) may explain the absence of a survival difference. Oral busulfan was used in the present study; use of the intravenous formulation may reduce toxicity and result in greater efficacy, and warrants further investigation in myeloma patients. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00560053).

Project description:PurposeTo demonstrate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) equivalence of a biosimilar enoxaparin to the reference drug, and to assess its safety and tolerability in healthy volunteers.Patients and methodsA randomized, double-blind, crossover, 2-sequence, single-dose study was conducted in healthy volunteers of both sexes. Participants were sequentially and randomly administered single subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin 100 mg manufactured by Rovi (test; Madrid, Spain) and Clexane® (enoxaparin 100 mg manufactured by Sanofi, reference) separated by a 1-week washout period. The primary PK/PD variables were maximum activity (Amax) and area under the effect curve from time 0 to the last measured activity (T) (AUEC0-T) and AUEC from time 0 to infinity (AUEC0-inf) of anti-FXa activity, and Amax and AUEC0-T of anti-FIIa activity. Secondary variables were Amax and AUEC0-T, AUEC0-inf of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and the ratio of AUEC0-T anti-FXa to anti-FIIa activity. Biosimilarity would be shown when the 95% CI of the ratio of geometric least squares means (95% CI RGLSMs) of primary PK/PD parameters fell within the standard range of bioequivalence, ie, 80%-125%.ResultsThe study sample consisted of 46 volunteers (33 males) aged 18-44 years and with body mass index ranging from 19.0 to 31.1 kg/m2. Three subjects did not complete the study. The curves of anti-FXa, anti-FIIa and tissue factor pathway inhibitor activities corresponding to administration of the test and reference products were comparable. The 95% CI RGLSMs of Amax, AUEC0-T and AUEC0-inf for anti-FXa activity were 94.6%-105.9%, 99.8%-108.0% and 100.0%-108.6% respectively; Amax and AUEC0-T for anti-FIIa activity were 94.7%-112.6% and 90.9%-117.9% respectively. In addition, the 95% CI RGLSMs of all secondary variables fell within the range 80%-125%. The incidence and types of adverse events after administration of the test and reference drugs were similar.ConclusionThe results conclusively showed that the enoxaparin manufactured by Rovi is equivalent to the reference enoxaparin in all primary and secondary PK/PD parameters, as required by the European Medicines Agency to grant marketing authorization to a biosimilar low molecular-weight heparin.

Dataset Information

A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Way Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Temozolomide 200 mg/m2 (Dralitem® vs. Temodal® Capsules) in Patients with Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System Under Fasting Conditions.

Publications

A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Way Crossover, Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Temozolomide 200 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Dralitem<sup>®</sup> vs. Temodal<sup>®</sup> Capsules) in Patients with Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System Under Fasting Conditions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets