Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling improved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled clinical trial.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Compare the immediate effects of a Neurodynamic Mobilization (NM) treatment or foam roller (FR) treatment after DOMS. DESIGN:Double blind randomised clinical trial. SETTING:The participants performed 100 drop jumps (5 sets of 20 repetitions, separated by 2 min rests) from a 0.5-m high box in a University biomechanics laboratory to induce muscle soreness. The participants were randomly assigned in a counter-balanced fashion to either a FR or NM treatment group. PARTICIPANTS:Thirty-two healthy subjects (21 males and 11 females, mean age 22.6 ± 2.2 years) were randomly assigned into the NM group (n = 16) or the FR group (n = 16). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS; 0-10), isometric leg strength with dynamometry, surface electromyography at maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and muscle peak activation (MPA) upon landing after a test jump were measured at baseline, 48 h after baseline before treatment, and immediately after treatment. RESULTS:Both groups showed significant reduction in NPRS scores after treatment (NM: 59%, p < .01; FR: 45%, p < .01), but no difference was found between them (p > .05). The percentage change improvement in the MVIC for the rectus femoris was the only significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05) at post-treatment. After treatment, only the FR group had a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01) in strength compared to pre-treatment. CONCLUSION:Our results illustrate that both treatments are effective in reducing pain perception after DOMS whereas only FR application showed differences for the MVIC in the rectus femoris and strength.

SUBMITTER: Romero-Moraleda B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5642244 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling improved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Romero-Moraleda Blanca B   La Touche Roy R   Lerma-Lara Sergio S   Ferrer-Peña Raúl R   Paredes Víctor V   Peinado Ana Belén AB   Muñoz-García Daniel D  

PeerJ 20171013


<h4>Objectives</h4>Compare the immediate effects of a Neurodynamic Mobilization (NM) treatment or foam roller (FR) treatment after DOMS.<h4>Design</h4>Double blind randomised clinical trial.<h4>Setting</h4>The participants performed 100 drop jumps (5 sets of 20 repetitions, separated by 2 min rests) from a 0.5-m high box in a University biomechanics laboratory to induce muscle soreness. The participants were randomly assigned in a counter-balanced fashion to either a FR or NM treatment group.<h4  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4450872 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8776654 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10464284 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5623674 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8188598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9374544 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7379881 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7035661 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5401952 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9403597 | biostudies-literature