Dataset Information

Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Quantifying quality of life (QoL) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains challenging. Heart failure (HF)-specific health status measures are ideal for assessing symptoms of HF; however, if patients' QoL is limited by other factors, they may experience improved HF-specific QoL but no concurrent improvement in generic QoL. We sought to examine and predict discrepancies between disease-specific and generic QoL measures after LVAD. METHODS:We examined HF-specific and generic QoL with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQol-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively, among 1,888 patients with advanced heart failure who underwent LVAD implantation from 2012 to 2014 as part of the INTERMACS registry. RESULTS:Both measures showed substantial improvement, on average, at 6 months after LVAD, with mean changes of 32.7 ± 25.0 and 27.6 ± 27.4, respectively. Among the 1,539 patients (81.5%) with moderate/large improvement in KCCQ, 334 (21.7%) had discordant changes in generic QoL (i.e., VAS did not substantially increase despite improvement in KCCQ). In a multivariable logistic regression model, baseline VAS score was the strongest predictor of KCCQ-VAS discordance, whereas post-LVAD complications were not significant predictors of discordance. CONCLUSIONS:Most patients have major improvements in both HF-specific and generic QoL after LVAD implantation, and discordance in these measures after LVAD is uncommon. When it did occur, discordance was primarily observed in patients who reported good generic QoL on the VAS before LVAD (despite substantial impairment due to congestive HF). These results support the continued use of HF-specific health status measures to monitor QoL before and after LVAD implantation.

SUBMITTER: Nassif ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5651195 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.

Nassif Michael E ME Spertus John A JA Jones Philip G PG Fendler Timothy J TJ Allen Larry A LA Grady Kathleen L KL Arnold Suzanne V SV

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation 20170520 11

<h4>Background</h4>Quantifying quality of life (QoL) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains challenging. Heart failure (HF)-specific health status measures are ideal for assessing symptoms of HF; however, if patients' QoL is limited by other factors, they may experience improved HF-specific QoL but no concurrent improvement in generic QoL. We sought to examine and predict discrepancies between disease-specific and generic QoL measures after LVAD.<h4>Methods</h4>We examined HF-specif ...[more]

PMID: 28662987

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThis study examined patient outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation across a range of center surgical volumes.BackgroundIn order for a center to qualify for reimbursement, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires it to implant ≥10 LVADs or total artificial hearts over a 3-year period. The impact of center LVAD surgical volumes on patient outcomes has not been thoroughly scrutinized.MethodsCenter volumes were provided for 7,416 patients undergoing LVAD implantation who were enrolled in INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Center LVAD volume was categorized as either very low (≤10 implants/year, n = 617), low (11 to 30 implants/year, n = 2,561), medium (31 to 50 implants/year, n = 2,458), or high (>50 implants/year, n = 1,750). The main outcome of interest was patient survival based on center volume derived from Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression.ResultsOverall survival was associated with center volume (p = 0.003), as follows: 71 ± 1.8% (very low volume), 81 ± 0.8% (low volume), 83 ± 0.8% (medium volume), and 79 ± 1.0% (high volume) at 1 year. Compared with medium volume centers, the 90-day mortality was higher in very low volume (odds ratio [OR]: 1.35; p = 0.04) and high volume (OR: 1.28; p = 0.018) VAD centers. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality were 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 1.56), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.21), and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.30) for very low, low, and high volume centers, respectively. Center volume did not predict mortality (p = 0.25; n = 3,688) in INTERMACS profile 1 patients (patients who had sustained cardiogenic shock) and profile 2 patients (patients with progressive hemodynamic decline despite inotropes).ConclusionsCenter volume correlates with post-VAD survival, with worse survival noted at very-low volume centers. These findings suggest that current U.S. VAD center standards warrant reconsideration.

Project description:Background Factors related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 2 years after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are unknown. We sought to determine whether preimplant intended goal of LVAD therapy (heart transplant candidate [short-term group], uncertain heart transplant candidate [uncertain group], and heart transplant ineligible [long-term group]) and other variables were related to HRQOL 2 years after LVAD implantation. Methods and Results Our LVAD sample (n=1620) was from INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Using the EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), a generic HRQOL measure, and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), a heart failure-specific HRQOL measure, multivariable linear regression modeling was conducted with the EQ-5D-3L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and KCCQ-12 overall summary score (OSS) as separate dependent variables. Two years after LVAD implant, the short-term group had a significantly higher mean VAS score versus the uncertain and long-term groups (short-term: 75.18 [SD, 20.62]; uncertain: 72.27 [SD, 20.33]; long-term: 70.87 [SD, 22.09], P=0.01); differences were not clinically meaningful. Two-year mean scores did not differ by group for the KCCQ-12 OSS (short-term, 67.85 [SD, 20.61]; uncertain, 67.79 [SD, 19.31]; long-term, 67.08 [SD, 21.49], P=0.80). Factors associated with a worse VAS score 2 years postoperatively (n=1205) included not working; not having a short-term LVAD; and postoperative neurological dysfunction, greater health-related stress, coping poorly, less VAD self-care confidence, and less satisfaction with VAD surgery, explaining 28% of variance (P<0.001). Factors associated with a worse KCCQ-12 OSS 2 years postoperatively (n=1250) included not working; history of high body mass index and diabetes mellitus; and postoperative renal dysfunction, greater health-related stress, coping poorly, less VAD self-care confidence, less satisfaction with VAD surgery, and regret regarding VAD implantation, accounting for 36% of variance (P<0.001). Conclusions Factors related to HRQOL 2 years after LVAD implantation include demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.

Dataset Information

Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.

Publications

Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets