Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Better early functional outcome after short stem total hip arthroplasty? A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Collum Femoris Preserving stem with a Zweymuller straight cementless stem total hip replacement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.


ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Primary aim was to compare the functional results at 3 months and 2 years between short and conventional cementless stem total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aim was to determine the feasibility of a double-blind implant-related trial.

Design

A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. All patients, research assistants, clinical assessors, investigators and data analysts were blinded to the type of prosthesis.

Population

150 patients between 18 and 70 years with osteoarthritis of the hip, 75 in the short stem and 75 in the conventional stem group. Mean age: 60 years (SD 7).

Interventions

the Collum Femoris Preserving short stem versus the Zweymuller Alloclassic conventional stem.

Main outcome measures

The Dutch version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Secondary outcomes measures: Harris Hip Score, the Physical Component Scale of the SF12, the Timed Up and Go test, Pain and the EQ-5D. Feasibility outcomes: continued blinding, protocol adherence and follow-up success rate.

Results

No significant difference between the two groups. Mean HOOS total score in the short stem group increased 32.7 points from 36.6 (95% CI 32.9 to 40.2) preoperatively to 69.3 (95% CI 66.4 to 72.1) at 3 months follow-up. Mean HOOS total score in the conventional straight stem group increased 36.3 points from 37.1 (95% CI 33.9 to 40.3) preoperatively to 73.4 (95% CI 70.3 to 76.4) at 3 months follow-up. 91.2% of patients remained blinded at 2?years follow-up. Both protocol adherence and follow-up success rate were 98%.

Conclusions

Functional result at 3 months and 2 years after short stem THA is not superior to conventional cementless THA. There were more perioperative and postoperative complications in the short stem group. Direct comparison of two hip implants in a double-blinded randomised controlled trial is feasible.

Trial registration number

NTR1560.

SUBMITTER: van Oldenrijk J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5652481 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Better early functional outcome after short stem total hip arthroplasty? A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Collum Femoris Preserving stem with a Zweymuller straight cementless stem total hip replacement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

van Oldenrijk Jakob J   Scholtes Vanessa A B VAB   van Beers Loes W A H LWAH   Geerdink Carel H CH   Niers Bob B A M BBAM   Runne Wouter W   Bhandari Mohit M   Poolman Rudolf W RW  

BMJ open 20171016 10


<h4>Objectives</h4>Primary aim was to compare the functional results at 3 months and 2 years between short and conventional cementless stem total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aim was to determine the feasibility of a double-blind implant-related trial.<h4>Design</h4>A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. All patients, research assistants, clinical assessors, investigators and data analysts were blinded to the type of prosthe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3757479 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10558430 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7925530 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6354216 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7649111 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6820573 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5247516 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4513606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6534262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7183003 | biostudies-literature