Dataset Information

Inference of cell type specific regulatory networks on mammalian lineages.

ABSTRACT: Transcriptional regulatory networks are at the core of establishing cell type specific gene expression programs. In mammalian systems, such regulatory networks are determined by multiple levels of regulation, including by transcription factors, chromatin environment, and three-dimensional organization of the genome. Recent efforts to measure diverse regulatory genomic datasets across multiple cell types and tissues offer unprecedented opportunities to examine the context-specificity and dynamics of regulatory networks at a greater resolution and scale than before. In parallel, numerous computational approaches to analyze these data have emerged that serve as important tools for understanding mammalian cell type specific regulation. In this article, we review recent computational approaches to predict the expression and sequence-based regulators of a gene's expression level and examine long-range gene regulation. We highlight promising approaches, insights gained, and open challenges that need to be overcome to build a comprehensive picture of cell type specific transcriptional regulatory networks.

SUBMITTER: Chasman D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5656272 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Inference of cell type specific regulatory networks on mammalian lineages.

Chasman Deborah D Roy Sushmita S

Current opinion in systems biology 20170417

Transcriptional regulatory networks are at the core of establishing cell type specific gene expression programs. In mammalian systems, such regulatory networks are determined by multiple levels of regulation, including by transcription factors, chromatin environment, and three-dimensional organization of the genome. Recent efforts to measure diverse regulatory genomic datasets across multiple cell types and tissues offer unprecedented opportunities to examine the context-specificity and dynamics ...[more]

PMID: 29082337

Similar Datasets

Project description:Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) play a central role in systems biology, especially in the study of mammalian organ development. One key question remains largely unanswered: Is it possible to infer mammalian causal GRNs using observable gene co-expression patterns alone? We assembled two mouse GRN datasets (embryonic tooth and heart) and matching microarray gene expression profiles to systematically investigate the difficulties of mammalian causal GRN inference. The GRNs were assembled based on > 2,000 pieces of experimental genetic perturbation evidence from manually reading > 150 primary research articles. Each piece of perturbation evidence records the qualitative change of the expression of one gene following knock-down or over-expression of another gene. Our data have thorough annotation of tissue types and embryonic stages, as well as the type of regulation (activation, inhibition and no effect), which uniquely allows us to estimate both sensitivity and specificity of the inference of tissue specific causal GRN edges. Using these unprecedented datasets, we found that gene co-expression does not reliably distinguish true positive from false positive interactions, making inference of GRN in mammalian development very difficult. Nonetheless, if we have expression profiling data from genetic or molecular perturbation experiments, such as gene knock-out or signalling stimulation, it is possible to use the set of differentially expressed genes to recover causal regulatory relationships with good sensitivity and specificity. Our result supports the importance of using perturbation experimental data in causal network reconstruction. Furthermore, we showed that causal gene regulatory relationship can be highly cell type or developmental stage specific, suggesting the importance of employing expression profiles from homogeneous cell populations. This study provides essential datasets and empirical evidence to guide the development of new GRN inference methods for mammalian organ development.

Project description:Mammals are composed of hundreds of different cell types with specialized functions. Each of these cellular phenotypes are controlled by different combinations of transcription factors. Using a human non islet cell insulinoma cell line (TC-YIK) which expresses insulin and the majority of known pancreatic beta cell specific genes as an example, we describe a general approach to identify key cell-type-specific transcription factors (TFs) and their direct and indirect targets. By ranking all human TFs by their level of enriched expression in TC-YIK relative to a broad collection of samples (FANTOM5), we confirmed known key regulators of pancreatic function and development. Systematic siRNA mediated perturbation of these TFs followed by qRT-PCR revealed their interconnections with NEUROD1 at the top of the regulation hierarchy and its depletion drastically reducing insulin levels. For 15 of the TF knock-downs (KD), we then used Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) to identify thousands of their targets genome-wide (KD-CAGE). The data confirm NEUROD1 as a key positive regulator in the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN), and ISL1, and PROX1 as antagonists. As a complimentary approach we used ChIP-seq on four of these factors to identify NEUROD1, LMX1A, PAX6, and RFX6 binding sites in the human genome. Examining the overlap between genes perturbed in the KD-CAGE experiments and genes with a ChIP-seq peak within 50 kb of their promoter, we identified direct transcriptional targets of these TFs. Integration of KD-CAGE and ChIP-seq data shows that both NEUROD1 and LMX1A work as the main transcriptional activators. In the core TRN (i.e., TF-TF only), NEUROD1 directly transcriptionally activates the pancreatic TFs HSF4, INSM1, MLXIPL, MYT1, NKX6-3, ONECUT2, PAX4, PROX1, RFX6, ST18, DACH1, and SHOX2, while LMX1A directly transcriptionally activates DACH1, SHOX2, PAX6, and PDX1. Analysis of these complementary datasets suggests the need for caution in interpreting ChIP-seq datasets. (1) A large fraction of binding sites are at distal enhancer sites and cannot be directly associated to their targets, without chromatin conformation data. (2) Many peaks may be non-functional: even when there is a peak at a promoter, the expression of the gene may not be affected in the matching perturbation experiment.

Dataset Information

Inference of cell type specific regulatory networks on mammalian lineages.

Publications

Inference of cell type specific regulatory networks on mammalian lineages.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets