Unknown

Dataset Information

0

18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.


ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determine whether 18F-FDG PET response after induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy can identify patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who may benefit from subsequent esophagectomy. Methods: We identified and analyzed 220 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had received induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy, with or without surgery, with curative intent; all underwent 18F-FDG PET scanning before and after induction chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET responders were defined as patients who achieved complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy (maximum SUV ? 3.0). The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET response for patient outcomes was evaluated. Results: Overall, 86 patients had bimodality therapy (BMT; induction chemotherapy + chemoradiotherapy) and 134 had trimodality therapy (TMT; induction chemotherapy + chemoradiotherapy with surgery). Forty-eight patients (21.8%) achieved an 18F-FDG PET CR after induction chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET CR was found to correlate with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in BMT patients. For TMT patients, 18F-FDG PET CR predicted pathologic response (P = 0.003) but not survival. Among 18F-FDG PET nonresponders, TMT patients had significantly better survival than did BMT patients (P < 0.001). However, among 18F-FDG PET responders, BMT patients had OS (P = 0.201) and PFS (P = 0.269) similar to that of TMT patients. After propensity score-matched analysis, 18F-FDG PET responders treated with BMT versus TMT still had comparable OS and PFS, but TMT was associated with better locoregional control. Conclusion:18F-FDG PET response to induction chemotherapy could be a useful imaging biomarker to identify patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who could benefit from subsequent esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. Compared with BMT, TMT can significantly improve survival in 18F-FDG PET nonresponders. However, outcomes for 18F-FDG PET responders were similar after either treatment (BMT or TMT). Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Xi M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5666643 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Xi Mian M   Liao Zhongxing Z   Hofstetter Wayne L WL   Komaki Ritsuko R   Ho Linus L   Lin Steven H SH  

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 20170518 11


This study aimed to determine whether <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET response after induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy can identify patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who may benefit from subsequent esophagectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We identified and analyzed 220 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had received induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy, with or without surgery, with curative intent; all underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET scanning before and after in  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8803713 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3644202 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6362604 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6977262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9206060 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7394511 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6777412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6322736 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5842657 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10656631 | biostudies-literature