Dataset Information

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two epoetin alfa formulations Eporon® and Eprex® following a single subcutaneous administration in healthy male volunteers.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following a single subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa (Eporon®) with those of the comparator (Eprex®) in healthy male subjects.A randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose, that is, 4,000 IU, of the test or comparator epoetin alfa. After 4 weeks, all subjects received the alternative formulation. The primary PK parameters, maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), were calculated with the serum erythropoietin (EPO) concentrations from blood samples collected for 144 h after dosing. The reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts were measured up to 312 h as PD markers. The primary PD parameters, maximum observed effect (Emax) and area under the effect curve (AUEC), were obtained from the baseline-corrected reticulocyte count. The serum EPO concentration and the reticulocyte count were used to assess the concentration-response relationship. The tolerability and immunogenicity profiles were assessed together.Forty-two subjects completed the study. The mean EPO concentration-time profiles were comparable between the two formulations. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUCinf were 0.908 (0.843-0.978) and 1.049 (0.999-1.101), respectively, both of which were within the regulatory range of 0.80-1.25. Additionally, the PD and tolerability profiles were similar between the two formulations. The time-matched serum EPO concentration and PD markers presented a counterclockwise hysteresis, suggesting a time delay between the measured concentration and the response. Both formulations were well tolerated, and production of anti-drug antibodies was not observed.The two epoetin alfa formulations had similar PK, PD and tolerability profiles. Furthermore, both formulations had a similar time-matched serum EPO concentration and erythropoietic response profile. Thus, the two formulations are expected to be used interchangeably in clinical settings.

SUBMITTER: Yoon S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5667778 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two epoetin alfa formulations Eporon<sup>®</sup> and Eprex<sup>®</sup> following a single subcutaneous administration in healthy male volunteers.

Yoon Sumin S Rhee Su-Jin SJ Heo Sun Ju SJ Oh Tae Young TY Yoon Seo Hyun SH Cho Joo-Youn JY Lee SeungHwan S Yu Kyung-Sang KS

Drug design, development and therapy 20171027

<h4>Purpose</h4>This study aimed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following a single subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa (Eporon<sup>®</sup>) with those of the comparator (Eprex<sup>®</sup>) in healthy male subjects.<h4>Subjects and methods</h4>A randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose, that is, 4,000 IU, of the test or comparator epoetin alfa. After 4 week ...[more]

PMID: 29138535

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSeveral countries have used pegylation technology to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of essential drugs. Recently, a novel interferon alfa-2b protein conjugated to four-branched 12 kDa polyethylene glycol molecules was developed jointly between Cuba and Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of BIP48 (pegylated interferon alfa-2b from Bio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz, Brazil) to those of PEGASYS® (commercially available pegylated interferon alfa-2a from Roche Pharmaceutical).MethodsThis phase I, single-centre, randomized, double-blind crossover trial enrolled 31 healthy male volunteers aged 19 to 35 who were allocated to two stages, either side of a 5-week wash-out period, with each arm lasting 14 consecutive days after subcutaneous administration of 180 μg of one formulation or the other (study or comparator). The main outcome variable was serum pegylated interferon concentrations in 15 samples collected during the course of the study and tested using an enzyme immunoassay.ResultsThere were no differences between formulations in terms of magnitude or absorption parameters. Analysis of time parameters revealed that BIP48 remained in the body significantly longer than PEGASYS® (Tmax: 73 vs. 54 h [p = 0.0010]; MRT: 133 vs. 115 h [p = 0.0324]; ke: 0.011 vs. 0.013 h(-1) [p = 0.0153]; t1/2: 192 vs. 108 h [p = 0.0218]).ConclusionBIP48 showed the expected pharmacokinetic profile for a pegylated product with a branched molecular structure. Compared to PEGASYS®, the magnitude absorption was similar, but time parameters were consistent with slower elimination. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the clinical implications of these findings. A phase II-III repeated-dose clinical trial is ongoing to study these findings in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.Trial registrationThis study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov platform (accession number NCT01889849 ). This trial was retrospectively registered in June 2013.

Project description:ONS-3010 is being developed by Oncobiologics Inc. (Cranbury, NJ, USA) as a biosimilar of Humira®. This randomized, double blind, single-center phase I study (EudraCT registration # 2013-003551-38) was performed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) biosimilarity between two reference products (Humira® EU and US) and ONS-3010 in healthy volunteers, and to compare the safety and immunogenicity profiles. In addition, the intended pharmacological activity was assessed and compared by application of a whole blood challenge. Hundred ninety-eight healthy volunteers received a single 40?mg subcutaneous dose of ONS-3010, Humira® EU, or US. The pharmacodynamic effects were assessed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/aluminum hydroxide whole blood challenges (n?=?36; n?=?12 per treatment arm; male:female, 1:1). Equivalence was demonstrated on the PK endpoints (AUC0-inf, Cmax, and AUC0-last) based on bounds of 80-125% for the ratio of the geometric means (ONS-3010/Humira®). The immunogenicity profiles were comparable between treatment groups, and there were no indications for differences in routine safety parameters. Administration of adalimumab resulted in the observation of dramatically reduced tumor necrosis factor-? (TNF?) levels upon stimulation with LPS/aluminum hydroxide (>99%), with no differences between the three treatment groups in terms of magnitude or duration. Adalimumab also resulted in a reduction of LPS/aluminum hydroxide-induced interleukin (IL)-8 release (maximally 30%), suggested to have a causal relationship with the anti-TNF? treatment. LPS/aluminum hydroxide-induced release of IL-1? and IL-6 was not inhibited by anti-TNF? treatment. Taken together, these data are promising for the further clinical development of ONS-3010, demonstrate the relevance of the LPS/aluminum challenge to monitor Humira® effects, and emphasize the value of whole blood challenges for monitoring of proximal drug effects in healthy volunteers, and potentially in the target population.

Project description:IntroductionAmbroxol is used in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory conditions characterized by abnormal mucus secretion and impaired mucus transport and is available in a variety of formulations. This study aimed to compare the steady-state (SS) pharmacokinetic characteristics of extended-release (ER) 75-mg retard capsules with two immediate-release (IR) formulations (60-mg effervescent tablets and 30-mg tablets) over a 24-h period.MethodsAn open-label, randomized, three-period, six-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years who had a normal body mass index. The test (ER 75-mg retard capsule once daily) and reference treatments (half of IR 60-mg effervescent tablet twice daily or 30-mg IR tablet twice daily) were administered on days 1-5 of each treatment period. Meals were standardized and concomitant therapy was prohibited. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected on day 5 (SS) of each treatment period. The co-primary endpoints were exposure (AUCSS 0-24) and maximum plasma level (Cmax SS).ResultsTwenty-four participants received ambroxol (male n = 13, 54.2%; mean ± standard deviation [SD] age 25.0 ± 6.4 years) and 23 completed the study. ER retard capsules provided similar AUCSS 0-24 compared to IR tablets (geometric means ratio [GMR] 110.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI] 99.8%, 122.7%) and effervescent tablets (GMR 106.9%; 90% CI 100.3%, 114.0%). ER retard capsules provided similar Cmax SS compared to IR tablets (GMR 84.7%, 90% CI 77.0%, 93.3%), and lower Cmax SS compared to effervescent tablets (GMR 80.9%, 90% CI 73.9%, 88.6%). Time to Cmax SS (tmax SS) was longer with ER retard capsules (6.0 h) than with IR tablets (2.0 h) or effervescent tablets (1.0 h).ConclusionsER ambroxol 75-mg retard capsules given once daily showed a similar pharmacokinetic profile to IR ambroxol formulations and therefore can be used instead of these in the treatment of respiratory conditions. CLINICALTRIALS.Gov identifierNCT02036775.

Dataset Information

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two epoetin alfa formulations Eporon® and Eprex® following a single subcutaneous administration in healthy male volunteers.

Publications

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two epoetin alfa formulations Eporon<sup>®</sup> and Eprex<sup>®</sup> following a single subcutaneous administration in healthy male volunteers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets