Dataset Information

Bimodal coupling of ripples and slower oscillations during sleep in patients with focal epilepsy.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Differentiating pathologic and physiologic high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) is challenging. In patients with focal epilepsy, HFOs occur during the transitional periods between the up and down state of slow waves. The preferred phase angles of this form of phase-event amplitude coupling are bimodally distributed, and the ripples (80-150 Hz) that occur during the up-down transition more often occur in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). We investigated if bimodal ripple coupling was also evident for faster sleep oscillations, and could identify the SOZ. METHODS:Using an automated ripple detector, we identified ripple events in 40-60 min intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings from 23 patients with medically refractory mesial temporal lobe or neocortical epilepsy. The detector quantified epochs of sleep oscillations and computed instantaneous phase. We utilized a ripple phasor transform, ripple-triggered averaging, and circular statistics to investigate phase event-amplitude coupling. RESULTS:We found that at some individual recording sites, ripple event amplitude was coupled with the sleep oscillatory phase and the preferred phase angles exhibited two distinct clusters (p < 0.05). The distribution of the pooled mean preferred phase angle, defined by combining the means from each cluster at each individual recording site, also exhibited two distinct clusters (p < 0.05). Based on the range of preferred phase angles defined by these two clusters, we partitioned each ripple event at each recording site into two groups: depth iEEG peak-trough and trough-peak. The mean ripple rates of the two groups in the SOZ and non-SOZ (NSOZ) were compared. We found that in the frontal (spindle, p = 0.009; theta, p = 0.006, slow, p = 0.004) and parietal lobe (theta, p = 0.007, delta, p = 0.002, slow, p = 0.001) the SOZ incidence rate for the ripples occurring during the trough-peak transition was significantly increased. SIGNIFICANCE:Phase-event amplitude coupling between ripples and sleep oscillations may be useful to distinguish pathologic and physiologic events in patients with frontal and parietal SOZ.

SUBMITTER: Song I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5669821 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Bimodal coupling of ripples and slower oscillations during sleep in patients with focal epilepsy.

Song Inkyung I Orosz Iren I Chervoneva Inna I Waldman Zachary J ZJ Fried Itzhak I Wu Chengyuan C Sharan Ashwini A Salamon Noriko N Gorniak Richard R Dewar Sandra S Bragin Anatol A Engel Jerome J Sperling Michael R MR Staba Richard R Weiss Shennan A SA

Epilepsia 20170926 11

<h4>Objective</h4>Differentiating pathologic and physiologic high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) is challenging. In patients with focal epilepsy, HFOs occur during the transitional periods between the up and down state of slow waves. The preferred phase angles of this form of phase-event amplitude coupling are bimodally distributed, and the ripples (80-150 Hz) that occur during the up-down transition more often occur in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). We investigated if bimodal ripple coupling was ...[more]

PMID: 28948998

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Sleep can modulate epileptic activities, but our knowledge of sleep perturbation by epilepsy remains sparse. Interestingly, epilepsy and sleep both present with defining electrophysiological features in the form of specific graphoelements on EEG. This raises the possibility to identify, within ongoing EEG activity, how epilepsy impacts and disrupts sleep. Here, we asked whether the presence of a lateralized epileptic focus interferes with the expression of the dominant electrophysiological hallmarks of sleep: slow oscillations, slow waves and spindles. To this aim, we conducted a cross-sectional study and analysed sleep recordings with surface EEG from 69 patients with focal epilepsy (age range at EEG: 17–61 years, 29 females, 34 left focal epilepsy). Comparing patients with left and right focal epilepsy, we assessed inter-hemispheric asymmetry of sleep slow oscillations power (delta range, 0.5–4 Hz); sleep slow wave density; amplitude, duration and slope; and spindle density, amplitude, duration as well as locking to slow oscillations. We found significantly different asymmetries in slow oscillation power (P < 0.01); slow wave amplitude (P < 0.05) and slope (P < 0.01); and spindle density (P < 0.0001) and amplitude (P < 0.05). To confirm that these population-based differences reflect actual patient-by-patient differences, we then tested whether asymmetry of sleep features can classify laterality of the epileptic focus using a decision tree and a 5-fold cross-validation. We show that classification accuracy is above chance level (accuracy of 65%, standard deviation: 5%) and significantly outperforms a classification based on a randomization of epileptic lateralization (randomization data accuracy: 50%, standard deviation 7%, unpaired t-test, P < 0.0001). Importantly, we show that classification of epileptic lateralization by the canonical epileptic biomarker, i.e. interictal epileptiform discharges, improves slightly but significantly when combined with electrophysiological hallmarks of physiological sleep (from 75% to 77%, P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA + Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). Together, we establish that epilepsy is associated with inter-hemispheric perturbation of sleep-related activities and provide an in-depth multi-dimensional profile of the main sleep electrophysiological signatures in a large cohort of patients with focal epilepsy. We provide converging evidence that the underlying epileptic process interacts with the expression of sleep markers, in addition to triggering well-known pathological activities, such as interictal epileptiform discharges. Sleep can modulate epilepsy, but we still lack a precise insight into how epilepsy affects sleep. Sheybani et al. show that sleep electrophysiological activities are asymmetrically expressed in patients with focal epilepsy, contributing to a better understanding of the interaction between epilepsy and normal brain network. Graphical Abstract Graphical abstract

Project description:Simultaneous scalp EEG/functional MRI measures non-invasively haemodynamic responses to interictal epileptic discharges, which are related to the epileptogenic zone. High frequency oscillations are also an excellent indicator of this zone, but are primarily recorded from intracerebral EEG. We studied the spatial overlap of these two important markers in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to assess if their combination could help better define the extent of the epileptogenic zone. We included patients who underwent EEG-functional MRI and later intracerebral EEG. Based on intracerebral EEG findings, we separated patients with unifocal seizures from patients with multifocal or unknown onset seizures. Haemodynamic t-maps were coregistered with the intracerebral electrode positions. Each EEG channel was classified as pertaining to one of the following categories: primary haemodynamic cluster (maximum t-value), secondary cluster (t-value > 90% of the primary cluster) or outside the primary and secondary clusters. We marked high frequency oscillations (ripples: 80-250 Hz; fast ripples: 250-500 Hz) during 1 h of slow wave sleep, and compared their rates in each haemodynamic category. After classifying channels as high- or low-rate, the proportion of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was compared to the proportion expected by chance. Twenty-five patients, 11 with unifocal and 14 with multifocal/unknown seizure onsets, were studied. We found a significantly higher median high frequency oscillation rate in the primary cluster compared to secondary cluster and outside these two clusters for the unifocal group (P < 0.0001), but not for the multifocal/unknown group. For the unifocal group, the number of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was significantly higher than expected by chance. This held only for the high-ripple-rate channels in the multifocal/unknown group. At the patient level, most patients (18/25, or 72%) had at least one high-rate channel within a primary cluster. In patients with unifocal epilepsy, the maximum haemodynamic response (primary cluster) related to scalp interictal discharges overlaps with the tissue generating high frequency oscillations at high rates. If intracranial EEG is warranted, this response should be explored. As a tentative clinical use of the combination of these techniques we propose that higher high frequency oscillation rates inside than outside the maximum response indicates that the patient has indeed a focal epileptogenic zone demarcated by this response, whereas similar rates inside and outside may indicate a widespread epileptogenic zone or an epileptogenic zone not covered by the implantation.

Dataset Information

Bimodal coupling of ripples and slower oscillations during sleep in patients with focal epilepsy.

Publications

Bimodal coupling of ripples and slower oscillations during sleep in patients with focal epilepsy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets