Dataset Information

The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.

ABSTRACT: The accuracy of radiographic methods for dental age estimation is important for biological growth research and forensic applications. Accuracy of the two most commonly used systems (Demirjian and Willems) has been evaluated with conflicting results. This study investigates the accuracies of these methods for dental age estimation in different populations.A search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Database of Open Access Journals and Google Scholar was undertaken. Eligible studies published before December 28, 2016 were reviewed and analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed on 28 published articles using the Demirjian and/or Willems methods to estimate chronological age in 14,109 children (6,581 males, 7,528 females) age 3-18 years in studies using Demirjian's method and 10,832 children (5,176 males, 5,656 females) age 4-18 years in studies using Willems' method. The weighted mean difference at 95% confidence interval was used to assess accuracies of the two methods in predicting the chronological age.The Demirjian method significantly overestimated chronological age (p<0.05) in males age 3-15 and females age 4-16 when studies were pooled by age cohorts and sex. The majority of studies using Willems' method did not report significant overestimation of ages in either sex. Overall, Demirjian's method significantly overestimated chronological age compared to the Willems method (p<0.05). The weighted mean difference for the Demirjian method was 0.62 for males and 0.72 for females, while that of the Willems method was 0.26 for males and 0.29 for females.The Willems method provides more accurate estimation of chronological age in different populations, while Demirjian's method has a broad application in terms of determining maturity scores. However, accuracy of Demirjian age estimations is confounded by population variation when converting maturity scores to dental ages. For highest accuracy of age estimation, population-specific standards, rather than a universal standard or methods developed on other populations, need to be employed.

SUBMITTER: Esan TA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5678786 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.

Esan Temitope Ayodeji TA Yengopal Veerasamy V Schepartz Lynne A LA

PloS one 20171108 11

<h4>Background</h4>The accuracy of radiographic methods for dental age estimation is important for biological growth research and forensic applications. Accuracy of the two most commonly used systems (Demirjian and Willems) has been evaluated with conflicting results. This study investigates the accuracies of these methods for dental age estimation in different populations.<h4>Methods</h4>A search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Database of Open Access Journals and Google Scholar was undertaken. Eligib ...[more]

PMID: 29117240

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecently, the dental age estimation method developed by Cameriere has been widely recognized and accepted. Although machine learning (ML) methods can improve the accuracy of dental age estimation, no machine learning research exists on the use of the Cameriere dental age estimation method, making this research innovative and meaningful.AimThe purpose of this research is to use 7 lower left permanent teeth and three models [random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and linear regression (LR)] based on the Cameriere method to predict children's dental age, and compare with the Cameriere age estimation.Subjects and methodsThis was a retrospective study that collected and analyzed orthopantomograms of 748 children (356 females and 392 males) aged 5-13 years. Data were randomly divided into training and test datasets in an 80-20% proportion for the ML algorithms. The procedure, starting with randomly creating new training and test datasets, was repeated 20 times. 7 permanent developing teeth on the left mandible (except wisdom teeth) were recorded using the Cameriere method. Then, the traditional Cameriere formula and three models (RF, SVM, and LR) were used to estimate the dental age. The age prediction accuracy was measured by five indicators: the coefficient of determination (R2), mean error (ME), root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE).ResultsThe research showed that the ML models have better accuracy than the traditional Cameriere formula. The ME, MAE, MSE, and RMSE values of the SVM model (0.004, 0.489, 0.392, and 0.625, respectively) and the RF model (- 0.004, 0.495, 0.389, and 0.623, respectively) were lower with the highest accuracy. In contrast, the ME, MAE, MSE and RMSE of the European Cameriere formula were 0.592, 0.846, 0.755, and 0.869, respectively, and those of the Chinese Cameriere formula were 0.748, 0.812, 0.890 and 0.943, respectively.ConclusionsCompared to the Cameriere formula, ML methods based on the Cameriere's maturation stages were more accurate in estimating dental age. These results support the use of ML algorithms instead of the traditional Cameriere formula.

Project description:BackgroundNumerous dental age estimation methods have been devised and practised for decades. Among these, the London Atlas and Willems methods were two of the most frequently adopted, however dependent on atlantes or tables. A new estimation method less reliant on external measurement could be efficient and economical.AimThis study aimed to evaluate the utility and applicability of the dental age estimation methods of London Atlas, Willems, and a new quick method that subtracts the number of developing teeth from the universal root mature age of 16 years in one of the lower quadrants reported in this work among Chinese Uyghur children.MethodsA comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Subjects enrolled in the study were screened according to preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. The observer then obtained the dental age from the subjects' panoramic radiographs based on the estimated rules of the London Atlas, Willems, and a new quick method. Paired t-test was used to compare the accuracy and precision of the above three estimation methods. Independent-sample t-test was used to find the difference between gender.ResultsTotally, 831 radiographs entered the analyses of this study. Among the three methods evaluated, the Willems method, in particular, showed a distinct underestimated tendency. The mean error of the dental age predicted by the London Atlas, the Willems method, and the quick method was 0.06 ± 1.13 years, 0.44 ± 1.14 years, and 0.30 ± 0.63 years, respectively. The mean absolute error was 0.86 ± 0.75 years according to the London Atlas, 1.17 ± 0.89 years under the Willems method, and 0.70 ± 0.54 years under our quick method. No significant difference was found between the chronological age and dental age using the London Atlas, generally for the 10 to 15 years group (p > 0.05), but our quick method for the 15-16 years children (p < 0.05) and Willems method (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe London Atlas outperformed the Willems method with better accuracy and precision among 10-15 years Chinese Uyghur children. Our new quick method may be comparable to the London Atlas for children aged 10-14 and potentially become a more straightforward dental age prediction instrument.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough stroke is rare among the pediatric population, it is nevertheless associated with serious or life-threatening consequences. The etiologic factors of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are likely to vary over the course of childhood development. The incidence rates of AIS, not previously systematically examined by pediatric age subgroup, could guide studies of its etiology.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence rate of AIS by age-group in the pediatric population (aged 0-17/18 years) and identify any common trends or sources of variability across different countries.MethodsRates of pediatric AIS were collated from a systematic literature review of published studies globally (1983-2020) and hospitalization records from Europe and the USA (2015-2018). Records that were included in the analysis reported the code or description used for AIS diagnosis and age-specific data for children aged 0-17/18 years. AIS incidence rates were summarized by age-group, data source, country, and geographic region. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the heterogeneity of AIS rates in neonates.ResultsThe pooled AIS incidence rate was 5.6 per 100,000 children across all records. When only records reporting the AIS incidence rates for children across the full age range (0-17/18 years) were analyzed, the pooled AIS incidence rate was 4.6 per 100,000 children and ranged from 7.0 per 100,000 (Germany) to 1.3 per 100,000 (Denmark). The highest pooled rates were observed in the 0-28-day age-group (24.6 per 100,000 live births), declining to the lowest rates in the 5-9-year age-group, and rising again in the 10-17/18-year age-group. AIS rates were the most heterogeneous in the 0-28-day age-group and across European countries. Significantly higher AIS rates in neonates were observed from hospital databases (35.9 per 100,000) than in the literature (19.4 per 100,000). AIS rates may be underestimated as pediatric AIS events are rare and challenging to diagnose, and limited age-specific data are available.ConclusionsIncidence rates of pediatric AIS by age-groups followed a consistent overall pattern of a reverse J-shaped curve, with the highest rates in neonates, across predominantly European and North American countries. Further research is warranted to examine if this pattern is observed in other geographic regions and to identify AIS risk factors specific to different phases of childhood development.

Dataset Information

The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.

Publications

The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets