Dataset Information

Improved vessel-tissue contrast and image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI.

ABSTRACT: In radiation treatment planning for thoracic and abdominal tumors, 4D-MRI has shown promise in respiratory motion characterization with improved soft-tissue contrast compared to clinical standard, 4D computed tomography (4D-CT). This study aimed to further improve vessel-tissue contrast and overall image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI using a slab-selective (SS) excitation approach.The technique was implemented in a 3D radial sampling with self-gating-based k-space sorting sequence. The SS excitation approach was compared to a non-selective (NS) approach in six cancer patients and two healthy volunteers at 3T. Improvements in vessel-tissue contrast ratio (CR) and vessel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were analyzed in five of the eight subjects. Image quality was visually assessed in all subjects on a 4-point scale (0: poor; 3: excellent). Tumor (patients) and pancreas (healthy) motion trajectories were compared between the two imaging approaches.Compared with NS-4D-MRI, SS-4D-MRI significantly improved the overall vessel-tissue CR (2.60 ± 3.97 vs. 1.03 ± 1.44, P < 0.05), SNR (63.33 ± 38.45 vs. 35.74 ± 28.59, P < 0.05), and image quality score (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.02). Motion trajectories from the two approaches exhibited strong correlation in the superior-inferior (0.96 ± 0.06), but weaker in the anterior-posterior (0.78 ± 0.24) and medial-lateral directions (0.46 ± 0.44).The proposed 4D-MRI with slab-selectively excited 3D radial sampling allows for improved blood SNR, vessel-tissue CR, and image quality.

SUBMITTER: Deng Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5689937 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Improved vessel-tissue contrast and image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI.

Deng Zixin Z Yang Wensha W Pang Jianing J Bi Xiaoming X Tuli Richard R Li Debiao D Fan Zhaoyang Z

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20171004 6

<h4>Purpose</h4>In radiation treatment planning for thoracic and abdominal tumors, 4D-MRI has shown promise in respiratory motion characterization with improved soft-tissue contrast compared to clinical standard, 4D computed tomography (4D-CT). This study aimed to further improve vessel-tissue contrast and overall image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI using a slab-selective (SS) excitation approach.<h4>Methods</h4>The technique was implemented in a 3D radial sampling with self-gating- ...[more]

PMID: 28980395

Similar Datasets

Project description:Intraframe motion blurring, as a major challenge in free-breathing dynamic MRI, can be reduced if high temporal resolution can be achieved. To address this challenge, this work proposes a highly accelerated 4D (3D + time) dynamic MRI framework with subsecond temporal resolution that does not require explicit motion compensation. The method combines standard stack-of-stars golden-angle radial sampling and tailored GRASP-Pro (Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel imaging with imProved performance) reconstruction. Specifically, 4D dynamic MRI acquisition is performed continuously without motion gating or sorting. The k-space centers in stack-of-stars radial data are organized to guide estimation of a temporal basis, with which GRASP-Pro reconstruction is employed to enforce joint low-rank subspace and sparsity constraints. This new basis estimation strategy is the new feature proposed for subspace-based reconstruction in this work to achieve high temporal resolution (e.g., subsecond/3D volume). It does not require sequence modification to acquire additional navigation data, it is compatible with commercially available stack-of-stars sequences, and it does not need an intermediate reconstruction step. The proposed 4D dynamic MRI approach was tested in abdominal motion phantom, free-breathing abdominal MRI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Our results have shown that GRASP-Pro reconstruction with the new basis estimation strategy enables highly-accelerated 4D dynamic imaging at subsecond temporal resolution (with five spokes or less for each dynamic frame per image slice) for both free-breathing non-DCE-MRI and DCE-MRI. In the abdominal phantom, better image quality with lower root mean square error and higher structural similarity index was achieved using GRASP-Pro compared with standard GRASP. With the ability to acquire each 3D image in less than 1 s, intraframe respiratory blurring can be intrinsically reduced for body applications with our approach, which eliminates the need for explicit motion detection and motion compensation.

Project description:PurposeTo validate a respiratory motion correction method called focused navigation (fNAV) for free-running radial whole-heart 4D flow MRI.MethodsUsing fNAV, respiratory signals derived from radial readouts are converted into three orthogonal displacements, which are then used to correct respiratory motion in 4D flow datasets. Hundred 4D flow acquisitions were simulated with non-rigid respiratory motion and used for validation. The difference between generated and fNAV displacement coefficients was calculated. Vessel area and flow measurements from 4D flow reconstructions with (fNAV) and without (uncorrected) motion correction were compared to the motion-free ground-truth. In 25 patients, the same measurements were compared between fNAV 4D flow, 2D flow, navigator-gated Cartesian 4D flow, and uncorrected 4D flow datasets.ResultsFor simulated data, the average difference between generated and fNAV displacement coefficients was 0.04 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.32 mm and 0.31 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.35 mm in the x and y directions, respectively. In the z direction, this difference was region-dependent (0.02 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.51 mm up to 5.85 ±$$ \pm $$ 3.41 mm). For all measurements (vessel area, net volume, and peak flow), the average difference from ground truth was higher for uncorrected 4D flow datasets (0.32 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.11 cm2 , 11.1 ±$$ \pm $$ 3.5 mL, and 22.3 ±$$ \pm $$ 6.0 mL/s) than for fNAV 4D flow datasets (0.10 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.03 cm2 , 2.6 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.7 mL, and 5.1 ±0$$ \pm 0 $$ .9 mL/s, p < 0.05). In vivo, average vessel area measurements were 4.92 ±$$ \pm $$ 2.95 cm2 , 5.06 ±$$ \pm $$ 2.64 cm2 , 4.87 ±$$ \pm $$ 2.57 cm2 , 4.87 ±$$ \pm $$ 2.69 cm2 , for 2D flow and fNAV, navigator-gated and uncorrected 4D flow datasets, respectively. In the ascending aorta, all 4D flow datasets except for the fNAV reconstruction had significantly different vessel area measurements from 2D flow. Overall, 2D flow datasets demonstrated the strongest correlation to fNAV 4D flow for both net volume (r2 = 0.92) and peak flow (r2 = 0.94), followed by navigator-gated 4D flow (r2 = 0.83 and r2 = 0.86, respectively), and uncorrected 4D flow (r2 = 0.69 and r2 = 0.86, respectively).ConclusionfNAV corrected respiratory motion in vitro and in vivo, resulting in fNAV 4D flow measurements that are comparable to those derived from 2D flow and navigator-gated Cartesian 4D flow datasets, with improvements over those from uncorrected 4D flow.

Dataset Information

Improved vessel-tissue contrast and image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI.

Publications

Improved vessel-tissue contrast and image quality in 3D radial sampling-based 4D-MRI.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets