Dataset Information

Is there a preferred IMRT technique for left-breast irradiation?

ABSTRACT: Not all clinics have breath-hold radiotherapy available for left-breast irradiation. However intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has also been advocated as a means of lowering heart doses. There is currently no large-scale, long-term follow-up data after breast IMRT and, since dose distributions may differ from classic tangent-based radiotherapy, caution is needed to avoid unexpected worsening of the late toxicity profile. We compared four IMRT techniques for free-breathing left-breast irradiation. Consistent with the aforementioned concerns, our goal in planning was to prioritize organ at risk (OAR) sparing in a way that mimicked tangent-based radiotherapy. Ten simultaneous integrated boost treatment plans (PTVelective = 15 × 2.67 Gy; PTVboost = 15 × 3.35 Gy) were created using 1) hybrid-IMRT (H-IMRT), 2) full IMRT (F-IMRT), and 3) volumetric-modulated arc therapy with two partial arcs (2ARC) and 4) six partial arcs (6ARC). Reduction in OAR mean and low dose was prioritized. End-points included OAR sparing (e.g., heart, left anterior descending artery [LAD+3 mm], lungs, and contralateral breast) and PTV coverage/dose homogeneity. Under these conditions we found the following: 1) H-IMRT provided the best mean and low dose OAR sparing, PTVelective coverage (mean V95% = 98%), PTVboost coverage (V95% = 98%), and PTV homogeneity. However, it delivered most intermediate-high dose to the heart, LAD+3 mm and ipsilateral lung; 2) 6ARC had the best intermediate-high dose sparing, followed by F-IMRT, but this was at the expense of more dose in the contralateral lung and breast and worse PTV coverage (PTVelective mean V95% = 96%/97% and PTVboost mean V95% = 91%/96% for 6ARC/F-IMRT). When trying to spare mean and low dose to OARs, the preferred IMRT technique for left-breast irradiation without breath-hold was H-IMRT. This is currently the standard solution in our institution for left-breast radiotherapy under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions.

SUBMITTER: Jeulink M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5690145 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is there a preferred IMRT technique for left-breast irradiation?

Jeulink Marloes M Dahele Max M Meijnen Philip P Slotman Ben J BJ Verbakel Wilko F A R WF

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20150508 3

Not all clinics have breath-hold radiotherapy available for left-breast irradiation. However intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has also been advocated as a means of lowering heart doses. There is currently no large-scale, long-term follow-up data after breast IMRT and, since dose distributions may differ from classic tangent-based radiotherapy, caution is needed to avoid unexpected worsening of the late toxicity profile. We compared four IMRT techniques for free-breathing left-breast irrad ...[more]

PMID: 26103488

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimA subsequent cardiac toxicity is deemed to be dose-dependent for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. This study aims to demonstrate the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing when the deep inspiration breath hold with Active Breathing Coordinator technique (ABC-DIBH) is used in left-sided breast cancer irradiation.Methods74 left-sided breast cancer patients, who received whole breast or post-mastectomy chest wall radiotherapy with ABC-DIBH between 2020 and 2021 in our center, were retrospectively reviewed in this study. CT scans of free breath (FB) and ABC-DIBH were done for each patient, and two treatment plans with a prescription dose of 5000 cGy/25 Fr were designed separately. The dose to heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD) and lungs was compared between FB and ABC-DIBH. The correlation between individual parameters (dose to organs at risk (OARs) and minimum heart distance (MHD)) was analyzed, and the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing was assessed.ResultsThe plans with ABC-DIBH achieved lower Dmean for heart (34.80%, P < 0.01) and LAD (29.33%, P < 0.01) than those with FB. Regression analysis revealed that both Dmean and D2 of heart were negatively correlated with MHD in the plans with FB and ABC-DIBH, which decreased with the increase in MHD by 37.8 cGy and 309.9 cGy per 1mm, respectively. Besides, a lower Dmean of heart was related to a larger volume of ipsilateral lung in plans with FB. With the increase in volume of ipsilateral lung, the linear correlation was getting weaker and weaker until the volume of ipsilateral lung reached 1700 cc. Meanwhile, a negative linear correlation between Dmean of LAD and MHD in plans with FB and ABC-DIBH was observed, whose slope was 162.5 and 135.9 cGy/mm, respectively. Furthermore, when the respiratory capacity of ABC-DIBH reached 1L, and the relative ratio (ABC-DIBH/FB) reached 3.6, patients could obtain the benefit of dose sparing. The larger difference in respiratory capacity had no significant effect in the larger difference of MHD, Dmean of heart and Dmean of LAD between FB and ABC-DIBH.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the sufficiently good effect of ABC-DIBH when utilizing for cardiac sparing. It also reveals the correlations among individual parameters and the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing. This helps take optimal advantage of the ABC-DIBH technique and predict clinical benefits.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES:This study compared VMAT and IMRT plans for intact breast radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer and evaluated the irradiated dose of planning target volume and OARs, especially focusing on heart and coronary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Eleven patients with left sided breast cancer whose breast was relatively smaller (the mean volumes is 296 cc) treated with breast-conserving surgery were prescribed radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions using two or four-field step and shoot IMRT (2 or 4-F IMRT), and one or two-arc VMAT (1 or 2-arc VMAT). The 10 Gy electron boost to the tumor bed after delivery of 50 Gy was not included in the analysis. Multiple planning parameters for the PTV and the PRV-OARs were measured and analyzed. RESULTS:Treatment plans generated using VMAT had better PTV homogeneity than the IMRT plans. For the PRV-OARs, the 1-arc VMAT had significantly higher Dmean and V5 for left lung and heart, and showed worse Dmean for liver, esophagus, spinal cord, contralateral lung and breast. In contrast, the 2-arc VMAT and the 2-F or 4-F IMRT plans showed better results for the PRV-OARs than the 1-arc VMAT. However, for the heart and coronary artery, the 1-arc VMAT showed better V20 and V40 compared with the other plans. Moreover, the 2 F-IMRT had specially advantage on V5 and V20 for heart and V5 for coronary arteries, the 2-F IMRT also showed a greater MU and treatment times. Using the table of quality score to evaluate the plans, we found that 2-F IMRT had the highest scores of 13, followed by the 2-arc VMAT plan (10 points) and 1-arc VMAT plan (8 points), and finally the 4-F IMRT plan (6 points). Moreover, when a dose comparison for heart minus coronary artery was calculated, the V20 and V40 for the rest of heart in all plans were very small and closed, indicating the dose to the coronary artery contributed dramatically to the high dose volumes for the entire heart. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to other plans, the 2-F IMRT plan with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time is an appropriate technique for left sided breast cancer, which achieved good PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk besides for the heart and coronary artery.

Dataset Information

Is there a preferred IMRT technique for left-breast irradiation?

Publications

Is there a preferred IMRT technique for left-breast irradiation?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets