Dataset Information

Geometric error of cervical point A calculated through traditional reconstruction procedures for brachytherapy treatment.

ABSTRACT: Brachytherapy used in local cervical cancer is still widely based on 2D standard dose planning with the prescription to point A, which is invisible on imaging and located at a high-dose gradient. In this study, the geometric location error of point A was investigated. It is traditionally reconstructed in the treatment planning system after carefully digitizing the point marks that were previously drawn on the orthogonal radiographs into the system. Two Cartesian coordinates of point A were established and compared. One was built up based on the geometric definition of point A and would be taken as the true coordinate, while the other was built up through traditional clinical treatment procedures and named as the practical coordinate. The orthogonal-film reconstruction technique was used and the location error between the practical and the true coordinate introduced from the variations of, first, the angle between the tandem and the simulator gantry-rotation-axis, and second, the interval between the tandem flange and the simulator isocenter, was analyzed. The location error of point A was higher if the tandem was rotated away from the gantry-rotation-axis or if the location of the tandem flange was set away from the isocenter. If a tandem with a 30-degree curvature was rotated away from the gantry-rotation-axis 10 degrees in the anterior-posterior (AP) view, and there was an 8.7 cm interval between the flange and the isocenter, the location error of point A would be greater than 3 mm without including other errors from simulator calibration, data input, patient setup and movements. To reduce the location error of point A calculated for traditional reconstruction procedures, it is suggested to move the couch or patient to make the mid-point of two points A near the isocenter and the tandem in the AP view parallel to the gantry-rotation-axis as much as possible.

SUBMITTER: Chang L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5690162 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Geometric error of cervical point A calculated through traditional reconstruction procedures for brachytherapy treatment.

Chang Liyun L Ho Sheng-Yow SY Yeh Shyh-An SA Lee Tsair-Fwu TF Chen Pang-Yu PY

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20150908 5

Brachytherapy used in local cervical cancer is still widely based on 2D standard dose planning with the prescription to point A, which is invisible on imaging and located at a high-dose gradient. In this study, the geometric location error of point A was investigated. It is traditionally reconstructed in the treatment planning system after carefully digitizing the point marks that were previously drawn on the orthogonal radiographs into the system. Two Cartesian coordinates of point A were estab ...[more]

PMID: 26699316

Similar Datasets

Project description:An iterative method is proposed to calibrate radiation sensitivities of an arbitrary two-dimensional (2D) array of detectors. The array is irradiated with a wide open- field beam at the central position, as well as at laterally and longitudinal shifted positions; the 2D beam profile of the wide field is reconstructed iteratively from the ratios of shifted images to the central image. The propagation errors due to output variation and inaccurate array positioning are estimated and removed from the reconstructed beam profile by an error-locking scheme with narrow open-field irradiations. The beam profile is interpolated when necessary and then compared to raw detector responses to determine sensitivities. Two additional methods were implemented for comparison: 1) the commercial iterative calibration method for MapCHECK2 with translation and rotation operations; 2) a labor-intensive noniterative method without the issue of error propagation. A MapCHECK2 2D detector array was used to validate the proposed method with the 6 MV photon beam from a Varian iX linear accelerator. All calibration methods were repeated three times. A total of 5, 9, and 29 irradiations were required to implement the commercial method, the proposed method and the noniterative method respec- tively. Moreover, a 5 mm positioning error was intentionally introduced into the calibration procedures of the commercial and the proposed method to test their robustness. Under the normal operation condition of the linear accelerator and with careful alignment of the MapCHECK2, the deviations of the calibrated sensitivities of the proposed method and commercial method with respect to the noniterative method were 0.30% ± 0.29% and 0.92% ± 0.63% respectively; when the 5 mm positioning error was presented, these two methods resulted in deviations of 0.40% ± 0.36% and 3.58% ± 1.94%, respectively. A patient study suggested that, due to this 5 mm positioning error, the mean DTA (dose to agreement) passing rate by the commercial method was 2.7% lower than that by the noniterative method, whereas the proposed method led to a comparable passing rate. It is evident from this study that the proposed iterative method leads to within 1% mean calibration results to established methods. It requires much fewer number of measurements than noniterative method and is more robust against the positioning error than the commercial iterative method. The method also eliminates the need of rotation operations and, therefore, is applicable to inline detector arrays without rotation function, such as electronic portal imager device (EPID).

Dataset Information

Geometric error of cervical point A calculated through traditional reconstruction procedures for brachytherapy treatment.

Publications

Geometric error of cervical point A calculated through traditional reconstruction procedures for brachytherapy treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets