Dataset Information

Macrophages are required to coordinate mouse digit tip regeneration.

ABSTRACT: In mammals, macrophages are known to play a major role in tissue regeneration. They contribute to inflammation, histolysis, re-epithelialization, revascularization and cell proliferation. Macrophages have been shown to be essential for regeneration in salamanders and fish, but their role has not been elucidated in mammalian epimorphic regeneration. Here, using the regenerating mouse digit tip as a mammalian model, we demonstrate that macrophages are essential for the regeneration process. Using cell-depletion strategies, we show that regeneration is completely inhibited; bone histolysis does not occur, wound re-epithelialization is inhibited and the blastema does not form. Although rescue of epidermal wound closure in the absence of macrophages promotes blastema accumulation, it does not rescue cell differentiation, indicating that macrophages play a key role in the redifferentiation of the blastema. We provide additional evidence that although bone degradation is a component, it is not essential to the overall regenerative process. These findings show that macrophages play an essential role in coordinating the epimorphic regenerative response in mammals.

SUBMITTER: Simkin J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5702070 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Macrophages are required to coordinate mouse digit tip regeneration.

Simkin Jennifer J Sammarco Mimi C MC Marrero Luis L Dawson Lindsay A LA Yan Mingquan M Tucker Catherine C Cammack Alex A Muneoka Ken K

Development (Cambridge, England) 20170921 21

In mammals, macrophages are known to play a major role in tissue regeneration. They contribute to inflammation, histolysis, re-epithelialization, revascularization and cell proliferation. Macrophages have been shown to be essential for regeneration in salamanders and fish, but their role has not been elucidated in mammalian epimorphic regeneration. Here, using the regenerating mouse digit tip as a mammalian model, we demonstrate that macrophages are essential for the regeneration process. Using ...[more]

PMID: 28935712

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: Repair of distal phalanx amputation is widely studied and thought to occur through a regenerative process. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA) has greatly improved the ability to characterize the cells that are involved in regeneration and abnormal healing of bone and soft tissue. Given the disorganized architecture of digit tip “regenerated” bone and its common progenitor cell to the pathologic process of heterotopic ossification, we hypothesized that digit tip repair after injury follows a program of aberrant wound repair rather than true regeneration of normal bone tissue. Methods: ScRNA data of mouse digit tip amputation (DTA) and embryonic limb development (EMB) was downloaded from NBCI GEO data base ascension number GSE135985. Additionally, scRNA data from heterotopic ossification (HO) was downloaded from GSE126060. HO, DTA, and EMB datasets were clustered individually. HO was merged and aligned with EMB and DT in separate analyses. Cells expressing the mesenchymal progenitor cell (MPC) marker Pdgfra, which we have shown to differentiate into HO and others have shown to differentiate into bone after DTA, were identified and analyzed in the HO-DTA and HO-EMB datasets. Monocle 2, Seurat 3.1.1, and Pearson correlation analysis were used for analysis and visualization. Immunostaining for markers present in DTA (ACAN, FBN-2, LTBP2) was performed on sections collected from a murine model of traumatic HO in Pdgfra-CreER;TdTomato mice induced with tamoxifen one-week prior to HO-forming injury. Results: MPC clusters from DTA and HO and from EMB and HO were aligned and projected using UMAP to compare transcription profiles. Across the timepoints, MPCs in the DTA and HO occupy similar regions of the UMAP plot, while MPCs in EMB and HO occupy largely independent regions, with only overlap at the latest time points. Using Monocle 2, cells were placed on a virtual timeline based on similarities in transcription. MPCs from DTA and HO meet at the same location on the trajectory following injury. In the EMB to HO comparison, cells only occupy similar regions of the trajectory at post-natal day 3 suggesting that bone is formed by different pathways. To understand correlations between time points, transcriptomes were also compared by Pearson analysis. MPCs following HO and DTA injuries occupy similar regions of the plot while MPCs in EMB and HO only occupy similar regions of the correlation plot at P3. Markers previously identified to be upregulated in MPCs in DTA were also upregulated in MPCs in HO by both scRNA and immunofluorescent histology. Conclusions: Cells responsible for bone repair following DTA show similar transcriptional profiles as MPCs in traumatic HO and dissimilar to MPCs in EMB. Furthermore, MPCs in both digit tip repair and HO follow trajectories that do not overlap with embryonic limb development. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time, that the process following DTA is not truly regeneration and follows programs of aberrant repair as seen in HO.

Dataset Information

Macrophages are required to coordinate mouse digit tip regeneration.

Publications

Macrophages are required to coordinate mouse digit tip regeneration.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets