Dataset Information

Determinants and effects of medical students' core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship.

ABSTRACT: Core self-evaluation (CSE) is a personality trait that involves a person's evaluation of his or her own worth, competence, and capability. The objective of this study was to determine whether medical students' CSEs exert beneficial effects on their adaptation to their clerkship in terms of their clinical competence and workplace well-being and whether their preclinical academic performance can be a trait-relevant situation that enhances their CSE expression. In total, 127 medical students from 2 cohorts were included as participants in this study. We analyzed complete measures of personal background, objective and subjective preclinical academic performance (course evaluation grades and self-reported efficacy), CSE tendencies, and clinical competence (as objective structured clinical examination scores) and workplace well-being (as compassion satisfaction and burnout) during their 2-year clerkship. Mixed linear models for repeated measures and multiple regressions were employed. Participants' CSE tendencies had positive effects on their workplace compassion satisfaction and burnout but not on their clinical competence during their clerkship. Additionally, using the objective and subjective preclinical academic performance of the medical students as indicators, we observed that neither could be trait-relevant situations to enhance their CSE expression. CSE personality tendencies might be key to medical students' ability to noncognitively adapt to clinical training during their clerkships. These tendencies should be identified earlier so that mentors can provide prompt care and support to mentees (medical students) during clerkships.

SUBMITTER: Lin YK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5706685 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Determinants and effects of medical students' core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship.

Lin Yung Kai YK Chen Der-Yuan DY Lin Blossom Yen-Ju BY

PloS one 20171129 11

Core self-evaluation (CSE) is a personality trait that involves a person's evaluation of his or her own worth, competence, and capability. The objective of this study was to determine whether medical students' CSEs exert beneficial effects on their adaptation to their clerkship in terms of their clinical competence and workplace well-being and whether their preclinical academic performance can be a trait-relevant situation that enhances their CSE expression. In total, 127 medical students from 2 ...[more]

PMID: 29186158

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe final year of medical training in Germany is one of the least structured and standardized years of medical school. Medical students often complain about a lack of guidance, supervision and feedback. They are mostly asked to perform delegable nonmedical tasks even though student experiences in this period critically determine future decisions for certain medical specialties. Consequently, right from the beginning many young professionals feel overburdened especially by the time pressure of everyday clinical practice. The planned amendment of the medical licensing regulations will make competence-based training even more important. This article therefore aims to examine the extent to which a mentoring-based curriculum with workplace-based examinations during the final year of medical studies can make a valuable contribution to this.MethodsAfter a needs assessment (structured literature search, results evaluation and focus groups with both students and medical specialists), a mentoring-based curriculum for final year medical students was developed following the Kern cycle. In 2 work sessions 10 discipline-specific competencies for the fields of anesthesiology, critical care, emergency and pain medicine were established and prioritized, which had to be mastered by every student independently at the end of the training period. Assessment of these competencies was performed on a regular basis by trained mentors in the form of workplace-based assessments (mini-clinical evaluation exercise, mini-CEX, direct observation of procedural skills, DOPS). Multiperspective evaluation was and is the foundation of continuous program development. By September 2019 a total of 40 students had completed the modified curriculum and were subsequently interviewed online about various aspects of the tertial.ResultsThe response rate to the survey was 80% (n = 32). The gender ratio was balanced (male = 50%, female = 50%). Prioritization and assessment of 10 competencies by trained mentors enabled a focused, demand-driven and high-quality training of final year medical students. Surveyed students found the section mentoring and feedback to be very positive and it supported their learning success (grade 1.5). Despite firmly established feedback structures, in retrospect almost half (51.6%) wanted more structured feedback. Workplace-based assessments were mostly previously unknown (64.6%) but were experienced as helpful and meaningful (76.7%). Students felt confident and prepared for the final state examination (81.3%) and their career start (71.0%) after being part of the program. These findings were accompanied by a high level of satisfaction (grade 1.7) as well as a high recommendation rate for this institution (as a training program for final year medical students and as a career start for residents, both with 93.7%). Thus, the good evaluation results of the department before the start of the project could again be slightly improved.ConclusionA demand-driven, mentoring-based curriculum with integrated workplace-based assessments not only led to high overall student satisfaction but also promoted the quality of teaching in an effective and resource-saving way. Mentoring promotes learning success mainly through feedback and individual learning support and also supports the communicative and social skills of students and mentors alike.

Project description:ObjectivesTo find out how medical students think well-being should be measured.DesignA mixed-methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey (November 2020-March 2021) and semi-structured online interviews. Views on the frequency of availability for measurement, the format, type and purpose of measurement, and with whom well-being should be discussed were measured. When an outcome was scored 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale of agreement by ≥75% of participants it was considered critical. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on the interview transcripts.SettingAll medicine programmes at University of Southampton.ParticipantsMedical students from all years took part in the survey (n=118) and interviews (n=16).ResultsMost participants (94%) felt able to give 5 min to measure their well-being at least once per month. Research, governance and individual feedback were all considered critically important. Only subjective assessments undertaken by the individual in real-time were rated critically important (78.1%) measurement tools. Students selected that they would discuss their well-being with other medical students (n=87) nearly as often as they selected a member of the faculty (n=104). Five interview themes further explained these findings: (1) well-being is mental well-being; (2) exercise and support from friends and family are most important; (3) isolation and the design of the medicine programme are detrimental to well-being; (4) there are advantages to surveys, and conversations; (5) personal academic tutors and medical students in later years are the best to discuss well-being with.ConclusionsMedical students thought that measurement of their well-being was critically important for governance showing their support for quality assurance of well-being and peer support. They wanted to be able to choose surveys, or conversations, to measure their well-being, as well as the person they discussed well-being with. Four recommendations are discussed in light of these findings.

Dataset Information

Determinants and effects of medical students' core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship.

Publications

Determinants and effects of medical students' core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets