Dataset Information

Association of Electroconvulsive Therapy With Psychiatric Readmissions in US Hospitals.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is considered the most efficacious treatment available for individuals with severe affective disorders, ECT's availability is limited and declining, suggesting that information about the population-level effects of ECT is needed.

Objective

To examine whether inpatient treatment with ECT is associated with a reduction in 30-day psychiatric readmission risk in a large, multistate sample of inpatients with severe affective disorders.

Design, setting, and participants

A quasi-experimental instrumental variables probit model of the association correlation of ECT administration with patient risk of 30-day readmission was estimated using observational, longitudinal data on hospital inpatient discharges from US general hospitals in 9 states. From a population-based sample of 490 252 psychiatric inpatients, a sample was drawn that consisted of 162 691 individuals with a principal diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. The key instrumental variable used in the analysis was ECT prevalence in the prior calendar year at the treating hospital. To examine whether ECT's association with readmissions was heterogeneous across population subgroups, analyses included interactions of ECT with age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and diagnosis group. The study was conducted from August 27, 2015, to March 7, 2017.

Main outcome and measures

Readmission within 30 days of being discharged.

Results

Overall, 2486 of the 162 691 inpatients (1.5%) underwent ECT during their index admission. Compared with other inpatients, those who received ECT were older (mean [SD], 56.8 [16.5] vs 45.9 [16.5] years; P < .001) and more likely to be female (65.0% vs 54.2%; P < .001) and white non-Hispanic (85.3% vs 62.1%; P < .001), have MDD diagnoses (63.8% vs 32.0%; P < .001) rather than bipolar disorder (29.0% vs 40.0%; P < .001) or schizoaffective disorder (7.1% vs 28.0%; P < .001), have a comorbid medical condition (31.3% vs 26.6%; P < .001), have private (39.4% vs 21.7%; P < .001) or Medicare (49.2% vs 39.4%; P < .001) insurance coverage, and be located in urban small hospitals (31.2% vs 22.3%; P < .001) or nonurban hospitals (9.0% vs 7.6%; P = .02). Administration of ECT was associated with a reduced 30-day readmission risk among psychiatric inpatients with severe affective disorders from an estimated 12.3% among individuals not administered ECT to 6.6% among individuals administered ECT (risk ratio [RR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28-0.81). Significantly larger associations with ECT on readmission risk were found for men compared with women (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.69 vs 0.58; 95% CI, 0.30-0.88) and for individuals with bipolar disorder (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69) and schizoaffective disorder (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.11-0.79) compared with those who had MDD (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81).

Conclusions and relevance

Electroconvulsive therapy may be associated with reduced short-term psychiatric inpatient readmissions among psychiatric inpatients with severe affective disorders. This potential population health effect may be overlooked in US hospitals' current decision making regarding the availability of ECT.

SUBMITTER: Slade EP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5710550 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in March 2010, introduced payment-reduction penalties on acute care hospitals with higher-than-expected readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia. There is concern that hospitals serving large numbers of low-income and uninsured patients (safety-net hospitals) are at greater risk of higher readmissions and penalties, often due to factors that are likely outside the hospital's control. Using publicly reported data, we compared the readmissions performance and penalty experience among safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.MethodsWe used nationwide hospital level data for 2009-2016 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program, CMS Final Impact Rule, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. We identified as safety-net hospitals the top quartile of hospitals in terms of the proportion of patients receiving income-based public benefits. Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach based on the comparison of pre- vs. post-HRRP changes in (risk-adjusted) 30-day readmission rate in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals, we estimated the change in readmissions rate associated with HRRP. We also compared the penalty frequency among safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.ResultsOur study cohort included 1915 hospitals, of which 479 were safety-net hospitals. At baseline (2009), safety-net hospitals had a slightly higher readmission rate compared to non-safety net hospitals for all three conditions: AMI, 20.3% vs. 19.8% (p value< 0.001); heart failure, 25.2% vs. 24.2% (p-value< 0.001); pneumonia, 18.7% vs. 18.1% (p-value< 0.001). Beginning in 2012, readmission rates declined similarly in both hospital groups for all three cohorts. Based on difference-in-differences analysis, HRRP was associated with similar change in the readmissions rate in safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals for AMI and heart failure. For the pneumonia cohort, we found a larger reduction (0.23%; p < 0.001) in safety-net hospitals. The frequency of readmissions penalty was higher among safety-net hospitals. The proportion of hospitals penalized during all four post-HRRP years was 72% among safety-net and 59% among non-safety-net hospitals.ConclusionsOur results lend support to the concerns of disproportionately higher risk of performance-based penalty on safety-net hospitals.

Project description:IntroductionCare transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions.Methods and analysisThe scoping review will be structured according to Levac et al's enhancement to Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies.Ethics and disseminationThis work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems' careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study.

Project description:ImportanceKnowledge of the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of manic episodes is based on clinical experience, but empirical evidence is scarce. Moreover, prognostic factors associated with response to ECT in patients with mania are poorly understood.ObjectiveTo investigate the response to ECT in patients with manic episodes.Design, setting, and participantsThis nationwide, register-based observational cohort study was conducted using data from patients admitted to psychiatric departments in Sweden that reported data to the Swedish National Quality Registry for ECT (Q-ECT). Patients admitted to any hospital in Sweden and receiving ECT for a manic episode between 2012 and 2019 were considered for inclusion (605 individuals). The outcome, Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) score, was available in 571 patients. Data from several national registers were combined to determine clinical and sociodemographic factors. Analysis of data occurred from April through September 2021.ExposuresPatients treated with ECT for a mania were identified from the Q-ECT.Main outcomes and measuresResponse to ECT was defined by a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). Remission was defined as a Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI-S) score of 1 (reference range or not ill) or 2 (minimally ill) within 1 week after ECT. Univariate and multivariable regression models were used to investigate associations of sociodemographic factors, psychopharmacology, and comorbidities with response.ResultsAmong 571 patients with mania treated with ECT (211 [37.0%] men; median [IQR] age, 46 [31-59] years), 482 patients (84.4%) responded to ECT. Comorbid anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were associated with lower odds of response to ECT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.90 and aOR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.56, respectively). Patients who were markedly ill (aOR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.23-7.00), severely ill (aOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.06-6.34), or among the most extremely ill (aOR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.16-29.21) according to CGI-S score had higher odds of response than those with mild or moderate illness.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that ECT was associated with improvement for mania in clinical settings, with especially high response rates in patients with severe illness and those without comorbid anxiety or OCD.

Project description:ImportanceThe Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI) assesses neighborhood resources and conditions that influence health. It is unclear whether the COI scores are associated with health outcomes by race and ethnicity among children with type 1 diabetes (T1D).ObjectiveTo determine whether COI categories are associated with diabetes-related outcomes by race and ethnicity, including readmissions for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and co-occurring acute kidney injury (AKI) or cerebral edema (CE).Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study included children discharged with a primary diagnosis of T1D with DKA between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. Merged data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System and COI. Participants included children and adolescents younger than 21 years with an encounter for DKA. Data were analyzed from April 29, 2021, to January 5, 2022.ExposuresNeighborhood opportunity, measured with the COI as an ordered, categorical score (where a higher score indicates more opportunity), and race and ethnicity.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was readmission for DKA within 30 and 365 days from an index visit. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of encounters with AKI or CE. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to generate probabilities of readmission, AKI, and CE for each quintile of COI category by race and ethnicity.ResultsA total of 72 726 patient encounters were identified, including 38 924 (53.5%) for girls; the median patient age was 13 (IQR, 9-15) years. In terms of race and ethnicity, 600 (0.8%) of the encounters occurred in Asian patients, 9969 (13.7%) occurred in Hispanic patients, 16 876 (23.2%) occurred in non-Hispanic Black (hereinafter Black) patients, 40 129 (55.2%) occurred in non-Hispanic White (hereinafter White) patients, and 5152 (7.1%) occurred in patients of other race or ethnicity. The probability of readmission within 365 days was significantly higher among Black children with a very low COI category compared with Hispanic children (risk difference, 7.8 [95% CI, 6.0-9.6] percentage points) and White children (risk difference, 7.5 [95% CI, 5.9-9.1] percentage points) at the same COI category. Similar differences were seen for children with very high COI scores and across racial groups. The COI category was not associated with AKI or CE. However, race and ethnicity constituted a significant factor associated with AKI across all COI categories. The probability of AKI was 6.8% among Black children compared with 4.2% among Hispanic children (risk difference, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.7-3.3] percentage points) and 4.8% among White children (risk difference, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.3-2.6] percentage points).Conclusions and relevanceThese results suggest that Black children with T1D experience disparities in health outcomes compared with other racial and ethnic groups with similar COI categories. Measures to prevent readmissions for DKA should include interventions that target racial disparities and community factors.