Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Importance
Clinical guidelines advise against routine electrocardiograms (ECG) in low-risk, asymptomatic patients, but the frequency and impact of such ECGs are unknown.Objective
To assess the frequency of ECGs following an annual health examination (AHE) with a primary care physician among patients with no known cardiac conditions or risk factors, to explore factors predictive of receiving an ECG in this clinical scenario, and to compare downstream cardiac testing and clinical outcomes in low-risk patients who did and did not receive an ECG after their AHE.Design, setting, and participants
A population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative health care databases from Ontario, Canada, between 2010/2011 and 2014/2015 to identify low-risk primary care patients and to assess the subsequent outcomes of interest in this time frame. All patients 18 years or older who had no prior cardiac medical history or risk factors who received an AHE.Exposures
Receipt of an ECG within 30 days of an AHE.Main outcomes and measures
Primary outcome was receipt of downstream cardiac testing or consultation with a cardiologist. Secondary outcomes were death, hospitalization, and revascularization at 12 months.Results
A total of 3?629?859 adult patients had at least 1 AHE between fiscal years 2010/2011 and 2014/2015. Of these patients, 21.5% had an ECG within 30 days after an AHE. The proportion of patients receiving an ECG after an AHE varied from 1.8% to 76.1% among 679 primary care practices (coefficient of quartile dispersion [CQD], 0.50) and from 1.1% to 94.9% among 8036 primary care physicians (CQD, 0.54). Patients who had an ECG were significantly more likely to receive additional cardiac tests, visits, or procedures than those who did not (odds ratio [OR], 5.14; 95% CI, 5.07-5.21; P?Conclusions and relevanceDespite recommendations to the contrary, ECG testing after an AHE is relatively common, with significant variation among primary care physicians. Routine ECG testing seems to increase risk for a subsequent cardiology testing and consultation cascade, even though the overall cardiac event rate in both groups was very low.
SUBMITTER: Bhatia RS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5710571 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Bhatia R Sacha RS Bouck Zachary Z Ivers Noah M NM Mecredy Graham G Singh Jasjit J Pendrith Ciara C Ko Dennis T DT Martin Danielle D Wijeysundera Harindra C HC Tu Jack V JV Wilson Lynn L Wintemute Kimberly K Dorian Paul P Tepper Joshua J Austin Peter C PC Glazier Richard H RH Levinson Wendy W
JAMA internal medicine 20170901 9
<h4>Importance</h4>Clinical guidelines advise against routine electrocardiograms (ECG) in low-risk, asymptomatic patients, but the frequency and impact of such ECGs are unknown.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the frequency of ECGs following an annual health examination (AHE) with a primary care physician among patients with no known cardiac conditions or risk factors, to explore factors predictive of receiving an ECG in this clinical scenario, and to compare downstream cardiac testing and clinical o ...[more]