Dataset Information

Hospital Procalcitonin Testing and Antibiotic Treatment of Patients Admitted for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Randomized trials suggest that assessment of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels can be used to safely limit antibiotic use among patients hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Objectives

To determine the impact of PCT testing on antibiotic treatment of patients hospitalized for exacerbations of COPD in routine practice.

Methods

We conducted a series of cross-sectional and longitudinal multivariable analyses using data from 2009 to 2011 and 2013 to 2014 from a sample of 505 U.S. hospitals.

Results

Of 203,177 patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation in 2013 to 2014, nearly 9 out of 10 were treated with antibiotics. Hospital PCT testing rates ranged from 0 to 83%. In cross-sectional analysis, there was a weak negative association between the rate of PCT testing and risk-adjusted rates of antibiotic initiation (Spearman correlation, -0.12; P = 0.005); each 10-point increase in the percentage of patients undergoing PCT testing was associated with a 0.7% decline in risk-adjusted antibiotic use (P = 0.001). There was no association between hospital rates of PCT testing and duration of antibiotic treatment. In a longitudinal analysis, comparing treatment patterns in 2009 to 2011 and 2013 to 2014, we did not observe a significant difference in the change in antibiotic treatment rates or duration of therapy between hospitals that had adopted PCT testing compared with those that had not.

Conclusions

As currently implemented, PCT testing appears to have had little impact on decisions to initiate antibiotic therapy or on duration of treatment for COPD exacerbations. Implementation research is necessary to translate the promising outcomes from PCT testing observed in randomized trials into clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Lindenauer PK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5711260 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale: As chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence in women has outpaced that in men, COPD-related hospitalization and mortality are now higher in women. Presentation, evaluation, and treatment of COPD differ between women and men. Despite higher smoking rates in Veterans, little work has characterized differences in Veterans with COPD by sex. Objectives: To determine risk factors for 30-day readmission among Veterans hospitalized for COPD exacerbations and how they differed by sex. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of Veterans receiving primary care in Veterans Health Affairs facilities. We included Veterans Administration-based hospitalizations for Veterans with a COPD exacerbation (identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes) who survived to discharge between fiscal years 2012 and 2015. Primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Predictors ascertained before hospitalization included smoking status (current, former, never), pulmonary function testing, pulmonary medication prescriptions, and medical and psychiatric comorbidities (identified by International Classification of Disease, ninth revision codes). We created combined and sex-stratified multivariate logistic regression models to identify associations with 30-day readmission. Results: Our sample included 48,888 Veterans (4% women). Compared with men, women Veterans were younger, more likely to be nonwhite, and differed in smoking status. Women were more likely to have asthma, drug use, and several psychiatric comorbidities. Before hospitalization, women were less likely to have pulmonary function testing (76% vs. 78%; P?=?0.01) or be treated with antimuscarinic (43% vs. 48%) or combined long-acting bronchodilator/inhaled corticosteroid (61% vs. 64%) inhalers. Women were more likely to receive nicotine-replacement therapy (all P?<?0.01). Women had shorter length of stay (median days, 2 vs. 3; P?=?0.04) and lower 30-day readmission rate (20% vs. 22%; P = 0.01). In adjusted models including both sexes, age, antimuscarinic use, comorbidities, and diagnosis of drug or alcohol use were associated with readmission; there was no association with sex and readmission risk. In models stratified by sex, associations were similar between women and men. Conclusions: This study suggests differences between women and men hospitalized for COPD regarding presentation, evaluation, and management. Readmission is strongly influenced by comorbidities, suggesting individualized and comprehensive case management may reduce readmission risk for women and men with COPD.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can experience 'exacerbations' of their conditions. An exacerbation is an event defined in terms of subjective descriptors or symptoms, namely dyspnoea, cough and sputum that worsen sufficiently to warrant a change in medical management. There is a need for reliable markers that reflect the pathological mechanisms that underlie exacerbation severity and that can be used as a surrogate to assess treatment effects in clinical studies. Little is known as to how existing study variables and suggested markers change in both the stable and exacerbation phases of COPD. In an attempt to find the best surrogates for exacerbations, we have reviewed the literature to identify which of these markers change in a consistent manner with the severity of the exacerbation event. METHODS: We have searched standard databases between 1966 to July 2004 using major keywords and terms. Studies that provided demographics, spirometry, potential markers, and clear eligibility criteria were included in this study. Central tendencies and dispersions for all the variables and markers reported and collected by us were first tabulated according to sample size and ATS/ERS 2004 Exacerbation Severity Levels I to III criteria. Due to the possible similarity of patients in Levels II and III, the data was also redefined into categories of exacerbations, namely out-patient (Level I) and in-patient (Levels II & III combined). For both approaches, we performed a fixed effect meta-analysis on each of the reported variables. RESULTS: We included a total of 268 studies reported between 1979 to July 2004. These studies investigated 142,407 patients with COPD. Arterial carbon dioxide tension and breathing rate were statistically different between all levels of exacerbation severity and between in out- and in-patient settings. Most other measures showed weak relationships with either level or setting, or they had insufficient data to permit meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Arterial carbon dioxide and breathing rate varied in a consistent manner with exacerbation severity and patient setting. Many other measures showed weak correlations that should be further explored in future longitudinal studies or assessed using suggested mathematical modelling techniques.

Project description:BackgroundTo assess the ability of procalcitonin (PCT) to distinguish between bacterial and nonbacterial causes of patients with severe acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) admitted to the ICU, we conducted a retrospective analysis of two prospective studies including 375 patients with severe AECOPD with suspected lower respiratory tract infections. PCT levels were sequentially assessed at the time of inclusion, 6 h after and at day 1, using a sensitive immunoassay. The patients were classified according to the presence of a documented bacterial infection (including bacterial and viral coinfection) (BAC + group), or the absence of a documented bacterial infection (i.e., a documented viral infection alone or absence of a documented pathogen) (BAC- group). The accuracy of PCT levels in predicting bacterial infection (BAC + group) vs no bacterial infection (BAC- group) at different time points was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsRegarding the entire cohort (n = 375), at any time, the PCT levels significantly differed between groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). A pairwise comparison showed that PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with bacterial infection (n = 94) than in patients without documented pathogens (n = 218) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between patients with bacterial and viral infection (n = 63). For example, the median PCT-H0 levels were 0.64 ng/ml [0.22-0.87] in the bacterial group vs 0.24 ng/ml [0.15-0.37] in the viral group and 0.16 ng/mL [0.11-0.22] in the group without documented pathogens. With a c-index of 0.64 (95% CI; 0.58-0.71) at H0, 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.70] at H6 and 0.63 (95% CI; 0.56-0.69) at H24, PCT had a low accuracy for predicting bacterial infection (BAC + group).ConclusionDespite higher PCT levels in severe AECOPD caused by bacterial infection, PCT had a poor accuracy to distinguish between bacterial and nonbacterial infection. Procalcitonin might not be sufficient as a standalone marker for initiating antibiotic treatment in this setting.