Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

We are witnessing an explosive increase in redundant and overlapping publications of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the same topic, which often present conflicting results and interpretations, in the current medical literature. They represent wasted efforts on the part of investigators and peer reviewers and may confuse and possibly mislead clinicians and policymakers. Here, we present a protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation to describe how often there are overlapping SRs/MAs on the same topic, to assess the quality of these multiple publications, and to investigate the causes of discrepant results between multiple SRs/MAs in the field of major surgery.

Methods and analysis

We will use MEDLINE/PubMed to identify all SRs/MAs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2015 regarding major surgical interventions. After identifying the 'benchmark' SRs/MAs published in 2015, a process of screening in MEDLINE will be carried out to identify the previous SRs/MAs of RCTs on the same topic that were published within 5 years of the 'benchmark' SRs/MAs. We will tabulate the number of previous SRs/MAs on the same topic of RCTs, and then describe their variations in numbers of RCTs included, sample sizes, effect size estimates and other characteristics. We will also assess the differences in quality of each SR/MA using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) score. Finally, we will investigate the potential reasons to explain the discrepant results between multiple SRs/MAs.

Ethics and dissemination

No formal ethical approval and informed consent are required because this study will not collect primary individual data. The intended audiences of the findings include clinicians, healthcare researchers and policymakers. We will publish our findings as a scientific report in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number

In PROSPERO CRD42017059077, March 2017.

SUBMITTER: Katsura M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5724154 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.

Katsura Morihiro M   Kuriyama Akira A   Tada Masafumi M   Yamamoto Kazumichi K   Furukawa Toshi A TA  

BMJ open 20170821 8


<h4>Introduction</h4>We are witnessing an explosive increase in redundant and overlapping publications of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the same topic, which often present conflicting results and interpretations, in the current medical literature. They represent wasted efforts on the part of investigators and peer reviewers and may confuse and possibly mislead clinicians and policymakers. Here, we present a protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation to describe how oft  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6524137 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8242754 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7078380 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3716360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6814034 | biostudies-literature