Dataset Information

Choosing Wisely Canada Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign: a descriptive evaluation.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Resource stewardship is being increasingly recognized as an essential competency for physicians, but medical schools are just beginning to integrate this into education. We describe the evaluation of Choosing Wisely Canada's Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign, a student-led campaign to advance resource stewardship education in medical schools across Canada. METHODS:We evaluated the campaign 6 months after its launch, in November 2015. STARS students were administered a telephone survey eliciting a description of the initiatives that they had implemented or planned to implement at their schools to promote resource stewardship, and exploring their perceptions of facilitators of and barriers to successful implementation of their initiatives. We used a mixed-methods approach to analyze and summarize the data. RESULTS:Twenty-seven (82%) of the 33 eligible students representing all 17 medical schools responded. In 14 schools (82%), students led various local activities (e.g., interest groups, campaign weeks) to raise awareness about resource stewardship among medical students and faculty. Students contributed to curriculum change (both planned and implemented) at 10 schools (59%). Thematic analysis revealed key program characteristics that facilitated success (e.g., pan-Canadian student network, local faculty champion) as well as barriers to implementing change (e.g., complex processes to change curriculum, hierarchical nature of medical school). INTERPRETATION:This student-led campaign, with support from local faculty and Choosing Wisely Canada staff, led to awareness-building activities and early curricula change at medical schools across Canada. Future plans will build on the initial momentum created by the STARS campaign to sustain and spread local initiatives.

SUBMITTER: Cardone F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5741424 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Choosing Wisely Canada Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign: a descriptive evaluation.

Cardone Franco F Cheung Daphne D Han Angela A Born Karen B KB Alexander Lisa L Levinson Wendy W Wong Brian M BM

CMAJ open 20171201 4

<h4>Background</h4>Resource stewardship is being increasingly recognized as an essential competency for physicians, but medical schools are just beginning to integrate this into education. We describe the evaluation of Choosing Wisely Canada's Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign, a student-led campaign to advance resource stewardship education in medical schools across Canada.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated the campaign 6 months after its launch, in November 2 ...[more]

PMID: 29263153

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChoosing Wisely is a high-profile campaign seeking to reduce the use of low-value care. We investigated the impact of a Choosing Wisely Canada recommendation against using a combination of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for the management of hypertension, heart failure or diabetic nephropathy on population-level use of these medications in British Columbia, Canada.MethodsWe identified all people (any age) who were continuously registered with BC's Medical Service Plan between 2010 and 2017 with the targeted conditions. Using prescription claims data and an interrupted time-series analysis, we estimated the number of people on combination therapy per month, the proportion of days covered (PDC) by combination therapy per month and proportion of all combination prescriptions started per month in the 2 years before and after the introduction of the recommendation on Oct. 29, 2014.ResultsOf 1 104 593 people (mean age 65 yr, standard deviation 16 yr) in our study cohort, 4.6% were exposed to combination therapy, largely prescribed by family physicians (84%). The number of people on combination therapy and the PDC were declining before the recommendation, but the proportion of combination prescriptions started in the 2 years before the recommendation was increasing. After the recommendation, we observed no statistically significant changes in any outcome. The pre-existing downward trend of the monthly number of people decelerated (16.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0 to 19.5) and the proportion of prescriptions started increased (0.13%, 95% CI 0.08% to 0.18%).InterpretationThe Choosing Wisely Canada recommendation against using a combination of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was not associated with reduced combination therapy use in the targeted conditions. The observed pre-existing declines in this practice questions the process of selecting recommendations, and the optimal implementation and value of Choosing Wisely campaigns without other reinforcing interventions.

Project description:ImportanceThe association between regional norms of clinical practice and appropriateness of care is incompletely understood. Understanding regional patterns of care across diseases might optimize implementation of programs like Choosing Wisely, an ongoing campaign to decrease wasteful medical expenditures.ObjectiveTo determine whether regional rates of inappropriate prostate and breast cancer imaging were associated.Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective cohort study using the the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. We identified patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2007 with low-risk prostate (clinical stage T1c/T2a; Gleason score, ≤6; and prostate-specific antigen level, <10 ng/mL) or breast cancer (in situ, stage I, or stage II disease), based on Choosing Wisely definitions.Main outcomes and measuresIn a hospital referral region (HRR)-level analysis, our dependent variable was HRR-level imaging rate among patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Our independent variable was HRR-level imaging rate among patients with low-risk breast cancer. In a subsequent patient-level analysis we used multivariable logistic regression to model prostate cancer imaging as a function of regional breast cancer imaging and vice versa.ResultsWe identified 9219 men with prostate cancer and 30,398 women with breast cancer residing in 84 HRRs. We found high rates of inappropriate imaging for both prostate cancer (44.4%) and breast cancer (41.8%). In the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of breast cancer imaging, inappropriate prostate cancer imaging was 34.2%, 44.6%, 41.1%, and 56.4%, respectively. In the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of prostate cancer imaging, inappropriate breast cancer imaging was 38.1%, 38.4%, 43.8%, and 45.7%, respectively. At the HRR level, inappropriate prostate cancer imaging rates were associated with inappropriate breast cancer imaging rates (ρ = 0.35; P < .01). At the patient level, a man with low-risk prostate cancer had odds ratios (95% CIs) of 1.72 (1.12-2.65), 1.19 (0.78-1.81), or 1.76 (1.15-2.70) for undergoing inappropriate prostate imaging if he lived in an HRR in the fourth, third, or second quartiles, respectively, of inappropriate breast cancer imaging, compared with the lowest quartile.Conclusions and relevanceAt a regional level, there is an association between inappropriate prostate and breast cancer imaging rates. This finding suggests the existence of a regional-level propensity for inappropriate imaging utilization, which may be considered by policymakers seeking to improve quality of care and reduce health care spending in high-utilization areas.

Dataset Information

Choosing Wisely Canada Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign: a descriptive evaluation.

Publications

Choosing Wisely Canada Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign: a descriptive evaluation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets