Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Incremental validity of estimated cannabis grams as a predictor of problems and cannabinoid biomarkers: Evidence from a clinical trial.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Quantifying cannabis use is complex due to a lack of a standardized packaging system that contains specified amounts of constituents. A laboratory procedure has been developed for estimating physical quantity of cannabis use by utilizing a surrogate substance to represent cannabis, and weighing the amount of the surrogate to determine typical use in grams. METHOD:This secondary analysis utilized data from a multi-site, randomized, controlled pharmacological trial for adult cannabis use disorder (N=300), sponsored by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, to test the incremental validity of this procedure. In conjunction with the Timeline Followback, this physical scale-based procedure was used to determine whether average grams per cannabis administration predicted urine cannabinoid levels (11-nor-9-carboxy-?9-tetrahydrocannabinol) and problems due to use, after accounting for self-reported number of days used (in the past 30 days) and number of administrations per day in a 12-week clinical trial for cannabis use disorder. RESULTS:Likelihood ratio tests suggest that model fit was significantly improved when grams per administration and relevant interactions were included in the model predicting urine cannabinoid level (X2=98.3; p<0.05) and in the model predicting problems due to cannabis use (X2=6.4; p<0.05), relative to a model that contained only simpler measures of quantity and frequency. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides support for the use of a scale-based method for quantifying cannabis use in grams. This methodology may be useful when precise quantification is necessary (e.g., measuring reduction in use in a clinical trial).

SUBMITTER: Tomko RL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5742553 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Incremental validity of estimated cannabis grams as a predictor of problems and cannabinoid biomarkers: Evidence from a clinical trial.

Tomko Rachel L RL   Baker Nathaniel L NL   McClure Erin A EA   Sonne Susan C SC   McRae-Clark Aimee L AL   Sherman Brian J BJ   Gray Kevin M KM  

Drug and alcohol dependence 20171102


<h4>Background</h4>Quantifying cannabis use is complex due to a lack of a standardized packaging system that contains specified amounts of constituents. A laboratory procedure has been developed for estimating physical quantity of cannabis use by utilizing a surrogate substance to represent cannabis, and weighing the amount of the surrogate to determine typical use in grams.<h4>Method</h4>This secondary analysis utilized data from a multi-site, randomized, controlled pharmacological trial for ad  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4323823 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2703788 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7744589 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2863162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4356000 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4883103 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3461262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7819296 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7436063 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4888767 | biostudies-other