Acute Kidney Injury Ascertainment Is Affected by the Use of First Inpatient Versus Outpatient Baseline Serum Creatinine.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Liu KD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5762956 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Acute Kidney Injury Ascertainment Is Affected by the Use of First Inpatient Versus Outpatient Baseline Serum Creatinine.
Liu Kathleen D KD Hsu Chi-Yuan CY Yang Jingrong J Tan Thida C TC Zheng Sijie S Ordonez Juan D JD Go Alan S AS
Kidney international reports 20170831 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) incidence is increasing, however AKI is often missed at the emergency department (ED). AKI diagnosis depends on changes in kidney function by comparing a serum creatinine (SCr) measurement to a baseline value. However, it remains unclear to what extent different baseline values may affect AKI diagnosis at ED.MethodsRoutine care data from ED visits between 2012 and 2019 were extracted from the Utrecht Patient Oriented Database. We evaluated baseline definitions with criteria from the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO guidelines. We evaluated four baseline SCr definitions (lowest, most recent, mean, median), as well as five different time windows (up to 365 days prior to ED visit) to select a baseline and compared this to the first measured SCr at ED. As an outcome, we assessed AKI prevalence at ED.ResultsWe included 47,373 ED visits with both SCr-ED and SCr-BL available. Of these, 46,100 visits had a SCr-BL from the - 365/- 7 days time window. Apart from the lowest value, AKI prevalence remained similar for the other definitions when varying the time window. The lowest value with the - 365/- 7 time window resulted in the highest prevalence (21.4%). Importantly, applying the guidelines with all criteria resulted in major differences in prevalence ranging from 5.9 to 24.0%.ConclusionsAKI prevalence varies with the use of different baseline definitions in ED patients. Clinicians, as well as researchers and developers of automatic diagnostic tools should take these considerations into account when aiming to diagnose AKI in clinical and research settings.
| S-EPMC8573871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Deviations in serum creatinine (SCr), due to its determination using a Jaffe or an enzymatic method, have an effect on kidney disease detection and staging. It is not yet clear how large this effect is in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). SCr measurement differences are of particular importance here to evaluate the graft function. Methods: The results of all parallel SCr measurements (Jaffe and enzymatic method) of adult outpatient KTRs in the same serum sample at the University Hospital Essen (Germany) between January 2020 and October 2023 were evaluated. A Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) was used to assess the difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic SCr (eSCr). For all patients, we used the CKD-EPI 2009 and EKFC formula, and for patients ≥ 70 years, we also used the BIS1 formula for the determination of eGFR. Results: A total of 12,081 parallel SCr measurements from 1243 KTRs were analyzed, where 61% were male and the median age was 53 years. On average, Jaffe SCr was 0.03 mg/dL higher than eSCr (LoA -0.16; 0.21 mg/dL). On average, the eGFR determined by Jaffe SCr was 1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower than the eGFR determined by eSCr (LoA -9.5; 5.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). The comparison of eGFR between the two SCr methods revealed a different CKD stage in 1589 (13%) of all analyzed measurements, most frequently between G2/G3a (41%) and G3a/G3b (24%). When using the EKFC and BIS1 formulas, there were approximately the same number of measurements leading to a different CKD stage. Conclusions: In more than every tenth SCr determination in outpatient KTRs, the difference between the Jaffe and enzymatic methods had an influence on the assignment to a CKD stage. This effect was comparably pronounced for all eGFR formulas applied.
| S-EPMC11508460 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7938179 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivesBaseline creatinine (BCr) is frequently missing in AKI studies. Common surrogate estimates can misclassify AKI and adversely affect the study of related outcomes. This study examined whether multiple imputation improved accuracy of estimating missing BCr beyond current recommendations to apply assumed estimated GFR (eGFR) of 75 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (eGFR 75).Design, setting, participants, & measurementsFrom 41,114 unique adult admissions (13,003 with and 28,111 without BCr data) at Vanderbilt University Hospital between 2006 and 2008, a propensity score model was developed to predict likelihood of missing BCr. Propensity scoring identified 6502 patients with highest likelihood of missing BCr among 13,003 patients with known BCr to simulate a "missing" data scenario while preserving actual reference BCr. Within this cohort (n=6502), the ability of various multiple-imputation approaches to estimate BCr and classify AKI were compared with that of eGFR 75.ResultsAll multiple-imputation methods except the basic one more closely approximated actual BCr than did eGFR 75. Total AKI misclassification was lower with multiple imputation (full multiple imputation + serum creatinine) (9.0%) than with eGFR 75 (12.3%; P<0.001). Improvements in misclassification were greater in patients with impaired kidney function (full multiple imputation + serum creatinine) (15.3%) versus eGFR 75 (40.5%; P<0.001). Multiple imputation improved specificity and positive predictive value for detecting AKI at the expense of modestly decreasing sensitivity relative to eGFR 75.ConclusionsMultiple imputation can improve accuracy in estimating missing BCr and reduce misclassification of AKI beyond currently proposed methods.
| S-EPMC3531649 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) system for classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) severity utilizes a staging schema based on relative changes in serum creatinine (sCr) concentration and urine output. This study compares the in-hospital mortality associated with KDIGO-defined AKI stages and AKI stages defined by absolute sCr increases ('Delta-Creatinine').MethodsThe study included an analysis of hospital discharge and laboratory data from an urban academic medical center over a 1-year period. Including adult in-patients undergoing two or more sCr measurements, the study classified AKI stages using the KDIGO consensus standards as well as absolute increases in sCr ('Delta-Creatinine'); Stage 0, sCr increase <0.3 mg/dL, Stage 1, sCr increase 0.3-0.69 mg/dL, Stage 2, sCr increase 0.7-1.19 mg/dL and Stage 3, sCr increase ≥1.2 mg/dL or initiation of renal replacement therapy. The Delta-Creatinine cut-points were defined to optimize discrimination of in-patient mortality between AKI stages. The associations between KDIGO and Delta-Creatinine AKI stages and in-hospital mortality were compared using the time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) and the net reclassification improvement (NRI).ResultsOf the 19 878 hospitalizations included in the analysis, the prevalence of AKI was 23.4% as defined by the KDIGO criteria. The Delta-Creatinine system discriminated the differences between adjacent AKI stages (i.e. 1 versus 0, 2 versus 1, 3 versus 3) earlier than the KDIGO system. The NRI between Delta-Creatinine and KDIGO for the prediction of mortality was 9.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-13.2%]. Stratification by age, sex, race and history of chronic kidney disease (CKD) resulted in similar NRI values.ConclusionThe Delta-Creatinine system, based on the absolute increases in sCr, provides a promising alternative to the KDIGO system for characterizing the severity of AKI and its associations with in-patient mortality.
| S-EPMC3685303 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and rapidity of acute kidney injury (AKI) detection by cystatin C level relative to creatinine level after cardiac surgery.Study designProspective cohort study.Settings & participants1,150 high-risk adult cardiac surgery patients in the TRIBE-AKI (Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury) Consortium.PredictorChanges in serum creatinine and cystatin C levels.OutcomePostsurgical incidence of AKI.MeasurementsSerum creatinine and cystatin C were measured at the preoperative visit and daily on postoperative days 1-5. To allow comparisons between changes in creatinine and cystatin C levels, AKI end points were defined by the relative increases in each marker from baseline (25%, 50%, and 100%) and the incidence of AKI was compared based on each marker. Secondary aims were to compare clinical outcomes among patients defined as having AKI by cystatin C and/or creatinine levels.ResultsOverall, serum creatinine level detected more cases of AKI than cystatin C level: 35% developed a ≥25% increase in serum creatinine level, whereas only 23% had a ≥25% increase in cystatin C level (P < 0.001). Creatinine level also had higher proportions meeting the 50% (14% and 8%; P < 0.001) and 100% (4% and 2%; P = 0.005) thresholds for AKI diagnosis. Clinical outcomes generally were not statistically different for AKI cases detected by creatinine or cystatin C level. However, for each AKI threshold, patients with AKI confirmed by both markers had a significantly higher risk of the combined mortality/dialysis outcome compared with patients with AKI detected by creatinine level alone (P = 0.002).LimitationsThere were few adverse clinical outcomes, limiting our ability to detect differences in outcomes between subgroups of patients based on their definitions of AKI.ConclusionsIn this large multicenter study, we found that cystatin C level was less sensitive for AKI detection than creatinine level. However, confirmation by cystatin C level appeared to identify a subset of patients with AKI with a substantially higher risk of adverse outcomes.
| S-EPMC3496012 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionAcute kidney injury (AKI) affects 20% of hospitalized patients and worsens outcomes. To limit complications, post-discharge follow-up and kidney function testing are advised. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of follow-up after discharge among AKI survivors.MethodsThis was a population-based cohort study of adult Olmsted County residents hospitalized with an episode of stage II or III AKI between 2006 and 2014. Those dismissed from the hospital on dialysis, hospice, or who died within 30 days after discharge were excluded. The frequency and predictors of follow-up, defined as an outpatient serum creatinine (SCr) level or an in-person healthcare visit after discharge were described.ResultsIn the 627 included AKI survivors, the 30-day cumulative incidence of a follow-up outpatient SCr was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76% and 83%), a healthcare visit was 82% (95% CI: 79 and 85%), or both was 70% (95% CI: 66 and 73%). At 90 days and 1 year after discharge, the cumulative incidences of meeting both follow-up criteria rose to 82 and 91%, respectively. Independent predictors of receiving both an outpatient SCr assessment and healthcare visit within 30 days included lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge, higher comorbidity burden, longer length of hospitalization, and greater maximum AKI severity. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and socioeconomic status did not predict follow-up.ConclusionsAmong patients with moderate to severe AKI, 30% did not have follow-up with a SCr and healthcare visit in the 30-day post-discharge interval. Follow-up was associated with higher acuity of illness rather than demographic or socioeconomic factors.
| S-EPMC8665070 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivesDosing algorithms for warfarin incorporate clinical and genetic factors but may not account for the numerous comorbidities affecting patients who start warfarin while hospitalized. We aimed to determine whether these algorithms perform differently when warfarin is initiated for inpatients compared with outpatients.Patients and methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort of 1015 participants from the Clarification of Optimal Anticoagulation through Genetics (COAG) trial who were randomized to either pharmacogenetically or clinically guided warfarin dosing algorithms. Clinicians and participants were blinded to dose during the first 28 days. We compared groups, based on location at the time of the first warfarin dose request, in relation to the following outcomes: percentage of time in the therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (PTTR) during the first 4 weeks, time to first therapeutic INR, time to maintenance dose, and the difference between predicted and observed maintenance doses.ResultsA total of 527 participants started warfarin as inpatients and 488 as outpatients. There was no difference in PTTR based on location: 43.2 % for inpatient versus 47.4 % for outpatient initiation [mean adjusted difference -2.2 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -5.9 to 1.6]. Similarly, there were no differences in time to first therapeutic INR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06; 95 % CI 0.91-1.24] or to maintenance dose (HR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.81-1.14). There was no evidence of interaction between study intervention (pharmacogenetically vs. clinically guided therapy) and location of initiation for these main outcomes. The difference between predicted and observed maintenance doses was similar for both locations.ConclusionThe warfarin dosing algorithms performed similarly for subjects who initiated warfarin as inpatients and outpatients, regardless of whether dosing was pharmacogenetically or clinically guided.
| S-EPMC4508217 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionExperts have cautioned that assessment of proteinuria using urine protein-to-creatinine ratios (UPCRs) are not valid during acute kidney injury (AKI) because reduced urine creatinine in the denominator may artificially inflate the ratio. However, there is little empiric data assessing this theoretical concern.MethodsHere, we retrospectively examined changes in UPCRs measured during episodes of severe AKI and assessed whether the magnitude and direction of these changes associate with how the serum creatinine level is changing at the time of UPCR collection. We repeated these analyses comparing hospitalization UPCRs with prehospitalization or posthospitalization UPCRs, where available.ResultsAmong 329 adults hospitalized with stage 2 or 3 AKI (defined as peak:nadir serum creatinine during hospitalization ≥ 2) at the University of California, San Francisco from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2022 with multiple UPCRs measured during AKI hospitalization, UPCR values were similar whether the serum creatinine was increasing or decreasing at the time of measurement (median difference, 0.06 g/g; interquartile range [IQR], -0.26 to 0.50 g/g). There was no association between the difference in serum creatinine slopes when the UPCRs were collected and the difference in UPCR values (UPCR 0.05 g/g higher per mg/dl/d serum creatinine slope; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.36 to 0.47, P = 0.80). UPCRs measured during hospitalization demonstrated positive and negative predictive values suggesting utility in appraising clinically relevant outpatient UPCR levels.ConclusionDespite nonsteady state serum creatinine at the time of collection, UPCRs measured during AKI hospitalizations may be more informative than previously believed and should not be wholly disregarded.
| S-EPMC11652066 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAs the number of indications for labour induction continue to increase, the focus has shifted to performing these procedures in an outpatient setting. This study aims to systematically review published data from randomized controlled trials that compare outpatient with inpatient labour induction, to ascertain the role of outpatient labour induction for low-risk pregnancies.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review wherein we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis Previews®, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from inception to January 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials that reported on maternal, fetal and resource-related outcomes following outpatient versus inpatient labour induction. Pooled incidences and mean differences were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the method of induction.ResultsOf the 588 records identified, 12 publications, representing nine independent randomized controlled trials conducted in Australia, Europe and North America, were included. These reported on 2615 cases of labour induction (1320 outpatients versus 1295 inpatients). Overall, apart from a higher number of suspicious fetal heart rate tracings [RR = 1.43 (1.10, 1.86)] and a shorter mean length of hospital stay [MD = 282.48 min (160.23, 404.73) shorter] in the outpatient group, there were no differences in delivery method, adverse outcomes or resource-use between the two arms. On subgroup analysis, when comparing the use of balloon catheters in both arms, those induced as outpatients had fewer caesarean deliveries [RR = 0.52 (0.30, 0.90)], a shorter admission-to-delivery interval [MD = 370.86 min (19.19, 722.54) shorter], and a shorter induction to delivery interval [MD = 330.42 min (120.13, 540.71) shorter].ConclusionOutpatient labour induction in resource-rich settings is at least as effective and safe, in carefully selected patient populations, when compared with inpatient labour induction. Whether outpatient labour induction results in lower rates of caesarean deliveries needs to be explored further.Trial registrationThis systematic review was prospectively registered in Prospero ( CRD42019118049 ).
| S-EPMC7325658 | biostudies-literature