Dataset Information

Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

ABSTRACT: We set out to determine microscopic characteristics of the Descemet membrane interface during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation. Ten corneas were partially prepared, preserving half of the Descemet membrane attached to the stroma to enable visualisation of the Descemet-stroma interface. This tissue was prepared for viewing with a scanning electron microscope. The Descemet-stroma interface was categorised into three regions: centre, mid-periphery and periphery. We classified adhesions in these regions as either minor thread-like adhesions or major bridge-like adhesions with stromal detachments. We found a region-specific differentiation of the Descemet-stroma morphology. The presence of minor (P?=?0,0001) and major (P?=?0,0001) adhesions at the explored regions of the Descemet-stroma interface were found to be statistically significant. Fibrotic linear adhesions were predominant in the centre and mid-periphery, whereas the larger bridge-like adhesions were found mainly in the periphery. In addition, we observed a positive correlation between the size of the adhesions and the presence of ruptures in the underlying stromal bed. Viewing of the Descemet-stroma interface with electron microscopy reveals morphological differences between the centre of a graft and its periphery. These findings are of potential clinical relevance in terms of developing a better understanding of tissue behaviour during graft preparation.

SUBMITTER: Cabrerizo J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5765053 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

Cabrerizo Javier J Forshaw Thomas T Rodriguez-Aierbe Clara C Garrido-Fierro Jesus J

Scientific reports 20180111 1

We set out to determine microscopic characteristics of the Descemet membrane interface during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation. Ten corneas were partially prepared, preserving half of the Descemet membrane attached to the stroma to enable visualisation of the Descemet-stroma interface. This tissue was prepared for viewing with a scanning electron microscope. The Descemet-stroma interface was categorised into three regions: centre, mid-periphery and periphery. W ...[more]

PMID: 29323218

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe evaluated the visual outcomes and complications of "endothelium-out" and "endothelium-in" Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques.Materials and methodsElectronic searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane databases, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov. Study designs included clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and large case series (≥25 eyes). PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and synthesis. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses.Results21,323 eyes (95 studies) were included. Eighty-six studies reported on "endothelium-out" techniques; eight studies reported on "endothelium-in" techniques. One study compared "endothelium-out" to "endothelium-in" techniques. Eighteen "endothelium-out" studies reported that 42.5-85% of eyes achieved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI 49.4-67.7%,15 studies). Three "endothelium-in" studies reported that 44.7-87.5% of eyes achieved BCVA of ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 62.4% (95% CI 33.9-86.9%). Pooled mean endothelial cell loss was lower in the "endothelium-in" studies (28.1 ± 1.3%, 7 studies) compared to "endothelium-out" studies (36.3 ± 6.9%,10 studies) at 6 months (p = 0.018). Graft re-bubbling rates were higher in the "endothelium-out" studies (26.2%, 95% CI 21.9-30.9%, 74 studies) compared to "endothelium-in" studies (16.5%, 95% CI 8.5-26.4%, 6 studies), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.440). Primary graft failure rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.552). Quality of evidence was considered low and significant heterogeneity existed amongst the studies.ConclusionReported rates of endothelial cell loss were lower in "endothelium-in" DMEK studies at 6 months compared to "endothelium-out" studies. Outcomes of "endothelium-in" techniques were otherwise comparable to those reported in "endothelium-out" studies. Given the technical challenges encountered in "endothelium-out" procedures, surgeons may consider "endothelium-in" techniques designed for easier intra-operative DMEK graft unfolding. "Endothelium-in" studies evaluating outcomes at longer time points are required before conclusive comparisons between the two techniques can be drawn.

Dataset Information

Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

Publications

Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets