Platelet protein biomarker panel for ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lomnytska M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5767003 | biostudies-literature | 2018
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Platelet protein biomarker panel for ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Lomnytska Marta M Pinto Rui R Becker Susanne S Engström Ulla U Gustafsson Sonja S Björklund Christina C Templin Markus M Bergstrand Jan J Xu Lei L Widengren Jerker J Epstein Elisabeth E Franzén Bo B Auer Gert G
Biomarker research 20180112
<h4>Background</h4>Platelets support cancer growth and spread making platelet proteins candidates in the search for biomarkers.<h4>Methods</h4>Two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), Western blot, DigiWest.<h4>Results</h4>PLS-DA of platelet protein expression in 2D gels suggested differences between the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV of ovarian cancer, compared to benign adnexal lesions with a se ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAn early detection tool for EOC was constructed from analysis of biomarker expression data from serum collected during the UKCTOCS.MethodsThis study included 49 EOC cases (19 Type I and 30 Type II) and 31 controls, representing 482 serial samples spanning seven years pre-diagnosis. A logit model was trained by analysis of dysregulation of expression data of four putative biomarkers, (CA125, phosphatidylcholine-sterol acyltransferase, vitamin K-dependent protein Z and C-reactive protein); by scoring the specificity associated with dysregulation from the baseline expression for each individual.ResultsThe model is discriminatory, passes k-fold and leave-one-out cross-validations and was further validated in a Type I EOC set. Samples were analysed as a simulated annual screening programme, the algorithm diagnosed cases with >30% PPV 1-2 years pre-diagnosis. For Type II cases (~80% were HGS) the algorithm classified 64% at 1 year and 28% at 2 years tDx as severe.ConclusionsThe panel has the potential to diagnose EOC one-two years earlier than current diagnosis. This analysis provides a tangible worked example demonstrating the potential for development as a screening tool and scrutiny of its properties. Limits on interpretation imposed by the number of samples available are discussed.
| S-EPMC6738042 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWith the goal of discovering non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of GC, we conducted a case-control study utilising urine samples from individuals with predominantly early GC vs. healthy control (HC).MethodsAmong urine samples from 372 patients, age- and sex-matched 282 patients were randomly divided into three groups: 18 patients in a discovery cohort; 176 patients in a training cohort and 88 patients in a validation cohort.ResultsAmong urinary proteins identified in the comprehensive quantitative proteomics analysis, urinary levels of TFF1 (uTFF1) and ADAM12 (uADAM12) were significantly independent diagnostic biomarkers for GC, in addition to Helicobacter pylori status. A urinary biomarker panel combining uTFF1, uADAM12 and H. pylori significantly distinguished between HC and GC patients in both training and validation cohorts. On the analysis for sex-specific biomarkers, this combination panel demonstrated a good AUC of 0.858 for male GC, whereas another combination panel of uTFF1, uBARD1 and H. pylori also provided a good AUC of 0.893 for female GC. Notably, each panel could distinguish even stage I GC patients from HC patients (AUC = 0.850 for males; AUC = 0.845 for females).ConclusionsNovel urinary protein biomarker panels represent promising non-invasive biomarkers for GC, including early-stage disease.
| S-EPMC7686371 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Mortality from ovarian cancer remains high due to the lack of methods for early detection. The difficulty lies in the low prevalence of the disease necessitating a significantly high specificity and positive-predictive value (PPV) to avoid unneeded and invasive intervention. Currently, cancer antigen- 125 (CA-125) is the most commonly used biomarker for the early detection of ovarian cancer. In this study we determine the value of combining macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), osteopontin (OPN), and prolactin (PROL) with CA-125 in the detection of ovarian cancer serum samples from healthy controls. Materials and Methods: A total of 432 serum samples were included in this study. 153 samples were from ovarian cancer patients and 279 samples were from age-matched healthy controls. The four proteins were quantified using a fully automated, multi-analyte immunoassay. The serum samples were divided into training and testing datasets and analyzed using four classification models to calculate accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The four-protein biomarker panel yielded an average accuracy of 91% compared to 85% using CA-125 alone across four classification models (p = 3.224 × 10-9). Further, in our cohort, the four-protein biomarker panel demonstrated a higher sensitivity (median of 76%), specificity (median of 98%), PPV (median of 91.5%), and NPV (median of 92%), compared to CA-125 alone. The performance of the four-protein biomarker remained better than CA-125 alone even in experiments comparing early stage (Stage I and Stage II) ovarian cancer to healthy controls. Conclusions: Combining MIF, OPN, PROL, and CA-125 can better differentiate ovarian cancer from healthy controls compared to CA-125 alone.
| S-EPMC7830619 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Malignancies arising in the large bowel cause the second largest number of deaths from cancer in the Western World. Despite progresses made during the last decades, colorectal cancer remains one of the most frequent and deadly neoplasias in the western countries. METHODS: A genomic study of human colorectal cancer has been carried out on a total of 31 tumoral samples, corresponding to different stages of the disease, and 33 non-tumoral samples. The study was carried out by hybridisation of the tumour samples against a reference pool of non-tumoral samples using Agilent Human 1A 60-mer oligo microarrays. The results obtained were validated by qRT-PCR. In the subsequent bioinformatics analysis, gene networks by means of Bayesian classifiers, variable selection and bootstrap resampling were built. The consensus among all the induced models produced a hierarchy of dependences and, thus, of variables. RESULTS: After an exhaustive process of pre-processing to ensure data quality--lost values imputation, probes quality, data smoothing and intraclass variability filtering--the final dataset comprised a total of 8, 104 probes. Next, a supervised classification approach and data analysis was carried out to obtain the most relevant genes. Two of them are directly involved in cancer progression and in particular in colorectal cancer. Finally, a supervised classifier was induced to classify new unseen samples. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a tentative model for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on a biomarker panel. Our results indicate that the gene profile described herein can discriminate between non-cancerous and cancerous samples with 94.45% accuracy using different supervised classifiers (AUC values in the range of 0.997 and 0.955).
| S-EPMC3323359 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Our integrated -omics approach to ovarian cancer biomarker discovery has identified kallikrein 6 (KLK6) and folate-receptor 1 (FOLR1) as promising candidates but these markers require further validation. METHODS:KLK6, FOLR1, CA125, and HE4 were investigated in three independent serum cohorts with a total of 20 healthy controls, 150 benign controls, and 216 ovarian cancer patients. The serum biomarker levels were determined by ELISA or automated immunoassay. RESULTS:All biomarkers demonstrated elevations in the sera of ovarian cancer patients compared with controls (P < 0.01). Overall, CA125 and HE4 displayed the strongest ability (AUC 0.80 and 0.82, respectively) to identify ovarian cancer patients and the addition of HE4 to CA125 improved the sensitivity from 36% to 67% at a set specificity of 95%. In addition, the combination of HE4 and FOLR1 was a strong predictor of ovarian cancer diagnosis, displaying comparable sensitivity (65%) to the best-performing CA125-based models (67%) at a set specificity of 95%. CONCLUSIONS:The markers identified through our integrated -omics approach performed similarly to the clinically approved markers CA125 and HE4. Furthermore, HE4 represents a powerful diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer and should be used more routinely in a clinical setting. IMPACT:The implications of our study are 2-fold: (i) we have demonstrated the strengths of HE4 alone and in combination with CA125, lending credence to increasing its usage in the clinic; and (ii) we have demonstrated the clinical utility of our integrated -omics approach to identifying novel serum markers with comparable performance to clinical markers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(9); 1333-40. ©2016 AACR.
| S-EPMC5010461 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prostate cancer is diagnosed in over 1 million men every year globally, yet current diagnostic modalities are inadequate for identification of significant cancer and more reliable early diagnostic biomarkers are necessary for improved clinical management of prostate cancer patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) modulate important cellular processes/pathways contributing to cancer and are stably present in body fluids. In this study we profiled 372 cancer-associated miRNAs in plasma collected before (~60% patients) and after/during commencement of treatment (~40% patients), from age-matched prostate cancer patients and healthy controls, and observed elevated levels of 4 miRNAs - miR-4289, miR-326, miR-152-3p and miR-98-5p, which were validated in an independent cohort. The miRNA panel was able to differentiate between prostate cancer patients and controls (AUC = 0.88). Analysis of published miRNA transcriptomic data from clinical samples demonstrated low expression of miR-152-3p in tumour compared to adjacent non-malignant tissues. Overexpression of miR-152-3p increased proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells, suggesting a role for this miRNA in prostate cancer pathogenesis, a concept that was supported by pathway analysis of predicted miR-152-3p target genes. In summary, a four miRNA panel, including miR-152-3p which likely targets genes with key roles in prostate cancer pathogenesis, has the potential to improve early prostate cancer diagnosis.
| S-EPMC5923293 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo identify and validate a biomarker panel by serum metabolic profiling for improvement of PCa diagnosis.Materials and methodsTotally, 134 individuals were included in this study. Among them, 39 PCa patients and 45 control patients (negative prostate biopsy) were involved in the discovery phase and 50 healthy controls were enrolled for validation phase of metabolomics study. LC-MS Analysis was used for the identification of the serum metabolites of patients.ResultsLogistics regression analysis shows that 5 metabolites [dMePE(18:0/18:2), PC(16:0/20:2), PS(15:0/18:2), SM(d16:0/24:1], Carnitine C14:0) were significantly changed in PCa patients compared with control patients. A metabolic panel (MET) was calculated, showing a significantly higher diagnostic performance than PSA in differentiating PCa from control patients [AUC (MET vs. PSA): 0.823 ± 0.046 vs. 0.712 ± 0.057, p<0.001]. Moreover, this panel was superior to PSA in distinguishing PCa from negative prostate biopsies when PSA levels were less than 20 ng/ml [AUC (MET vs. PSA]: 0.836 ± 0.050 vs. 0.656 ± 0.067, p<0.001]. In the validation set, the MET panel yielded an AUC of 0.823 in distinguishing PCa patients from healthy controls, showing a significant improvement of PCa detection.ConclusionsThe metabolite biomarker panel discovered in this study presents a good diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa.
| S-EPMC8138432 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ovarian cancer is one of the most common and lethal gynecological malignancies. The diagnosis of ovarian cancer is often at an advanced stage. Accumulated evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles during ovarian tumorigenesis. In this study, using the lncRNA-mining approach, we analyzed lncRNA expression profiles of 493 ovarian cancer patients from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets, and identified a signature group of seven lncRNAs (BC037530, AK021924, AK094536, AK094536, BC062365, BC004123 and BC007937) associated with patient survival in the training dataset GSE9891. We also formulated a risk score model to divide patients into low-risk and high-risk groups based on the expression of these seven lncRNAs. We further validated the predictive power of our risk score model in two other datasets, GSE26193 and GSE63885. Our analysis showed that the seven-lncRNA signature can serve as an independent predictor apart from Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and patient age. Further investigation revealed the seven-lncRNA signature correlated with few critical signaling pathways involved in cancer. Combined, all these findings strongly support that the seven-lncRNA signature can serve as a strong prognosis biomarker.
| S-EPMC5466362 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction:Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) impacts kidney allograft outcome. The diagnosis is made based on findings from invasive kidney transplant biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to identify a noninvasive urinary protein biomarker for ABMR after kidney transplantation. Methods:We performed a multicenter case-control study to identify a urinary biomarker for ABMR (training cohort, n = 249) and an independent, prospective multicenter cohort study for validation (n = 391). We used concomitant biopsies to classify the samples according to the Banff classification. After untargeted protein identification and quantification, we used a support vector machine to train the model in the training cohort. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of the urinary biomarker for ABMR in the validation cohort. Results:We identified a set of 10 urinary proteins that accurately discriminated patients with (n = 60) and without (n = 189) ABMR in the training cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.00). The diagnostic accuracy was maintained in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8-0.93) for discriminating the presence (n = 43) from the absence (n = 348) of ABMR. The negative predictive value of the 10-protein marker set for exclusion of ABMR was 0.99, and the positive predictive value was 0.33. The diagnostic accuracy was independent of the reason for performing the biopsy, time after transplantation, and better than the accuracy of gross proteinuria (AUC, 0.76). Conclusions:We identified and validated a urinary protein biomarker set that can be used to exclude ABMR.
| S-EPMC7486186 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are preventable by early detection and removal of precancerous polyps. Even though CRC is the second most common internal cancer in Australia, only 30 per cent of the population considered to have risk factors participate in stool-based test screening programs. Evidence indicates a robust, blood-based, diagnostic assay would increase screening compliance. A number of potential diagnostic blood-based protein biomarkers for CRC have been reported, but all lack sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic. The aim of this study was to identify and validate a panel of protein-based biomarkers in independent cohorts that could be translated to a reliable, non-invasive blood-based screening test.Principal findingsIn two independent cohorts (n = 145 and n = 197), we evaluated seven single biomarkers in serum of CRC patients and age/gender matched controls that showed a significant difference between controls and CRC, but individually lack the sensitivity for diagnostic application. Using logistic regression strategies, we identified a panel of three biomarkers that discriminated between controls and CRC with 73% sensitivity at 95% specificity, when applied to either of the two cohorts. This panel comprised of Insulin like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), Dickkopf-3 (DKK3), and Pyruvate kinase M2(PKM2).ConclusionsDue to the heterogeneous nature of CRC, a single biomarker is unlikely to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic screening test and a panel of markers may be more effective. We have identified a 3 biomarker panel that has higher sensitivity and specificity for early stage (Stage I and -II) disease than the faecal occult blood test, raising the possibility for its use as a non-invasive blood diagnostic or screening test.
| S-EPMC4368610 | biostudies-literature