Dataset Information

Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

ABSTRACT: Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) has become an established treatment option for mitral regurgitation in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Currently, most procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA). An increasing number of centers, however, are performing the procedure under deep sedation (DS). Here, we compared patients undergoing PMVR with GA or DS.A total of 271 consecutive patients underwent PMVR at our institution between May 2014 and December 2016. Seventy-two procedures were performed under GA and 199 procedures under DS. We observed that in the DS group, doses of propofol (743±228 mg for GA versus 369±230 mg for DS, P<0.001) and norepinephrine (1.1±1.6 mg for GA versus 0.2±0.3 mg for DS, P<0.001) were significantly lower. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product were significantly higher in the GA group. There was no significant difference between GA and DS with respect to overall bleeding complications, postinterventional pneumonia (4% for GA versus 5% for DS), or C-reactive protein levels (361±351 nmol/L for GA versus 278±239 nmol/L for DS). Significantly fewer patients with DS needed a postinterventional stay in the intensive care unit (96% for GA versus 19% for DS, P<0.001). Importantly, there was no significant difference between DS and GA regarding intrahospital or 6-month mortality.DS for PMVR is safe and feasible. No disadvantages with respect to procedural outcome or complications in comparison to GA were observed. Applying DS may simplify the PMVR procedure.

SUBMITTER: Patzelt J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5779052 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Patzelt Johannes J Ulrich Miriam M Magunia Harry H Sauter Reinhard R Droppa Michal M Jorbenadze Rezo R Becker Annika S AS Walker Tobias T von Bardeleben Ralph Stephan RS Grasshoff Christian C Rosenberger Peter P Gawaz Meinrad M Seizer Peter P Langer Harald F HF

Journal of the American Heart Association 20171202 12

<h4>Background</h4>Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) has become an established treatment option for mitral regurgitation in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Currently, most procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA). An increasing number of centers, however, are performing the procedure under deep sedation (DS). Here, we compared patients undergoing PMVR with GA or DS.<h4>Methods and results</h4>A total of 271 consecutive patients underwent PMVR at our in ...[more]

PMID: 29197832

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsPercutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) has emerged as standard treatment in selected patients with clinically relevant mitral regurgitation (MR) and increased surgical risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing PMVR.Methods and resultsAltogether, 493 patients with severe MR who were treated with PMVR were included in this open-label prospective study and followed up for 2 years. We treated 25 patients with PMVR aged 90 years or above, 185 patients aged 80-89 years, and 283 patients aged <80 years. PMVR in nonagenarians was safe and did not differ from PMVR in younger patients in terms of safety endpoints. Device success did not differ among the groups (100% in nonagenarians, 95.7% in octogenarians, and 95.1% in septuagenarians, P = 0.100). Unadjusted 2 year mortality was 28% in nonagenarians, 32.4% in octogenarians, and 19.8% in septuagenarians (P = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed similar 2 year survival in the nonagenarian and octogenarian groups (P = 0.657). In the multivariate analysis, age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.060, P = 0.034], higher post-procedural transmitral valve gradients (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.104-1.277, P = 0.001), and post-procedural acute kidney injury (HR 2.360, 95% CI 1.431-3.893, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of 2 year mortality. Altogether, 89.4% of the nonagenarians, 85.9% of the octogenarians, and 86.4% of the septuagenarians had MR grade of 2+ or less at 1 year after PMVR (P = 0.910). New York Heart Association functional class improved in the vast majority of patients, irrespective of age (P = 0.129). After 1 year, 9.5% of the nonagenarians, 22.3% of the octogenarians, and 25.2% of the septuagenarians (each P = 0.001 compared with baseline) suffered from New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV. The rate of heart failure rehospitalization in the first 12 months after PMVR did not differ among the groups (16% in the nonagenarians, 16.7% in the octogenarians, and 17.7% in the septuagenarians) (P = 0.954). Quality of life assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire before and at 1 year after PMVR improved in all age groups (P = 0.001).ConclusionsPercutaneous mitral valve repair in carefully selected nonagenarians is feasible and safe with intermediate-term beneficial effects comparable with those in younger patients.

Project description:We aimed to identify predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence (MR) after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Patients with FMR were enrolled who underwent PMVR using the MitraClip® device. Procedural success was defined as reduction of MR of at least one grade to MR grade ≤ 2 + assessed at discharge. Recurrence of MR was defined as MR grade 3 + or worse at one year after initially successful PMVR. A total of 306 patients with FMR underwent PMVR procedure. In 279 out of 306 patients (91.2%), PMVR was successfully performed with MR grade ≤ 2 + at discharge. In 11.4% of these patients, MR recurrence of initial successful PMVR after 1 year was observed. Recurrence of MR was associated with a higher rate of heart failure rehospitalization during the 12 months follow-up (52.0% vs. 30.3%; p = 0.029), and less improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [68% vs. 19% of the patients presenting with NYHA functional class III or IV one year after PMVR when compared to patients without recurrence (p = 0.001)]. Patients with MR recurrence were characterized by a higher left ventricular sphericity index {0.69 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.64, 0.74] vs. 0.65 (IQR 0.58, 0.70), p = 0.003}, a larger left atrium volume [118 (IQR 96, 143) ml vs. 102 (IQR 84, 123) ml, p = 0.019], a larger tenting height 10 (IQR 9, 13) mm vs. 8 (IQR 7, 11) mm (p = 0.047), and a larger mitral valve annulus [41 (IQR 38, 43) mm vs. 39 (IQR 36, 40) mm, p = 0.015] when compared to patients with durable optimal long-term results. In a multivariate regression model, the left ventricular sphericity index [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.120, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.039-1.413, p = 0.003)], tenting height (OR 1.207, 95% CI 1.031-1.413, p = 0.019), and left atrium enlargement (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.000-1.038, p = 0.047) were predictors for MR recurrence after 1 year. In patients with FMR, baseline parameters of advanced heart failure such as spherical ventricle, tenting height and a large left atrium might indicate risk of recurrent MR one year after PMVR.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Publications

Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets