Dataset Information

Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.

ABSTRACT: Susceptibility testing for colistin remains challenging primarily due to its inherent properties. We evaluated colistin stability in agar and reproducibility of colistin MICs obtained by agar dilution, broth macro- and micro-dilution and MIC gradient strips on 3-7 iterations of each method using clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae (susceptible-CS, and resistant-CR, n?=?2 each), mcr-harboring Escherichia coli (n?=?2), and reference strains E. coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853. MICs for reference strains were not in the given range using Etest and broth microdilution (ATCC25922, 0.125 and 4 ?g/ml, respectively). MICs of CR-1 and CR-2, and of the mcr-harboring E. coli showed high concordance between agar and broth dilution varying up to one 2-fold dilution. However, remarkable variations were observed on broth dilution with CS-1 and CS-2 (MIC range 0.25-32 and 0.5-64 ?g/ml, respectively); whereas for agar dilution the MIC for both CS strains was 0.5 ?g/ml in all the runs. MICs obtained by MIC gradient strips were lower than those obtained by dilution methods (1-2 dilutions for CS and mcr strains, and up to five dilutions for CR strains). To confirm uniform distribution of colistin in agar, a single strain was spotted in five different regions of the same plate. All spots showed concordant growth with maximum one dilution difference. No effect on MIC was found due to storage of colistin-containing agar plates for 7 days at 4 °C. In our hands, agar dilution was superior in terms of reproducibility and robustness, compared to broth dilution methods, for colistin MIC determination.

SUBMITTER: Turlej-Rogacka A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5780530 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.

Turlej-Rogacka Agata A Xavier Basil Britto BB Janssens Lore L Lammens Christine C Zarkotou Olympia O Pournaras Spyros S Goossens Herman H Malhotra-Kumar Surbhi S

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 20171125 2

Susceptibility testing for colistin remains challenging primarily due to its inherent properties. We evaluated colistin stability in agar and reproducibility of colistin MICs obtained by agar dilution, broth macro- and micro-dilution and MIC gradient strips on 3-7 iterations of each method using clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae (susceptible-CS, and resistant-CR, n = 2 each), mcr-harboring Escherichia coli (n = 2), and reference strains E. coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853. MICs f ...[more]

PMID: 29177612

Similar Datasets

Project description:The increasing antibiotic resistance like the advent of carbapenem resistant Enterobactarales (CRE), Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumanii (CRAB), and Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has led to to the use of toxic and older drugs like colistin for these organisms. But worldwide there is an increase in resistance even to colistin mediated both by chromosomes and plasmids. This necessitates accurate detection of resistance. This is impeded by the unavailability of a user-friendly phenotypic methods for use in routine clinical microbiology practice. The present study attempts to evaluate two different methods - colistin broth disc elution and MIC detection by Vitek two in comparison to CLSI approved broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin for Enterobactarales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter baumanii clinical isolates. Colistin susceptibility of 6013 carbapenem resistant isolates was determined by BMD, Colistin Broth Disc Elution (CBDE), and Vitek two methods and was interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. The MIC results of CBDE, Vitek two were compared with that of BMD and essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), sensitivity, specificity, very major error (VME), major error (ME) and Cohen's kappa (CK) was calculated. The presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) was evaluated in all colistin-resistant isolates by conventional polymerase chain reaction. Colistin resistance was found in 778 (12.9 %) strains among the carbapenem resistant isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest (18.9 %) colistin resistance by the BMD method. MIC of Vitek two had sensitivity ranging from 78.2-84.8% and specificity of >92 %. There were 171 VMEs and 323 MEs by Vitek two method, much more than CLSI acceptable range. The highest percentage of errors was committed for Acinetobacter baumanii (27.8 % of VME and 7.9 % ME). On the other hand, the CBDE method performed well with EA, CA, VME and ME within acceptable range for all the organisms. The sensitivity of the CBDE method compared to gold standard BMD varied from 97.5-98.8 % for different strains with a specificity of more than 97.6 %. None of the isolated colistin resistant organisms harboured mcr plasmids. As BMD has many technical complexities, CBDE is the best viable alternative available for countries like India. A sensitive MIC reported by Vitek two needs to be carefully considered due high propensity for VMEs particularly for Klebsiella spp.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.

Publications

Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets